Re: Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

+1 to merge with the latest commits. Robert On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:12:31 +0100, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, Please verify my commit. thanks, Robert On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:36:29 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, On 30/12/17

Re: Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

Hi Karl Heinz, Please verify my commit. thanks, Robert On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 18:36:29 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, On 30/12/17 18:33, Robert Scholte wrote: Sure, let me pick this up I have already implemented different solutions but based on performance

Re: Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

Hi, On 30/12/17 18:33, Robert Scholte wrote: Sure, let me pick this up I have already implemented different solutions but based on performance measurements the one I have implemented seemed to be the fastest solution ?... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise Robert On Sat, 30 Dec 2017

Re: Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

Sure, let me pick this up Robert On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:15:41 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi Robert, On 29/12/17 11:18, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, I think the REgExp usage can be improved. Now it used for building up a new String followed by

Re: Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

Hi Robert, On 29/12/17 11:18, Robert Scholte wrote: Hi Karl Heinz, I think the REgExp usage can be improved. Now it used for building up a new String followed by searching, I would expect that searching for ${(.+)} groups to be more efficient. Do you have some suggestions what you exactly

Re: Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

Hi Karl Heinz, I think the REgExp usage can be improved. Now it used for building up a new String followed by searching, I would expect that searching for ${(.+)} groups to be more efficient. thanks, Robert On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 11:10:36 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise

Maven 3.5.3: MNG-6305

Hi, I would like to know if there are any objections to merge MNG-6305 into master (Jenkins is fine [1]). Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise [1]: https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven/job/MNG-6305-validation-of-ci-friendly/