But I think we should stop queuing up the next version with an official
number. Right now 3.3.6 exists with all unfinished items. My proposal is
just to leave that as 3.3.x so other JIRA versions can be renamed as
necessary (3.3.5 = 3.3.6).
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Paul
That's what I do in such case.
Den 22 jul 2015 17:56 skrev Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
Do we not just rename the version number?
On 22 July 2015 at 15:55, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I noticed that the next set of unresolved tickets are always
No, but that would be even easier.
Cheers,
Paul
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we not just rename the version number?
On 22 July 2015 at 15:55, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I noticed that the next set of
Do we not just rename the version number?
On 22 July 2015 at 15:55, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I noticed that the next set of unresolved tickets are always assigned a
version number. This leads to unnecessary maintenance when we have to burn
a point release (i.e., you
All,
I noticed that the next set of unresolved tickets are always assigned a
version number. This leads to unnecessary maintenance when we have to burn
a point release (i.e., you have to re-assign them to the next release) or
it's just time for a new point release. There's really no point in
