+1
Thx all for participating.
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:22 AM Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SUREFIRE/versions/12343425
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 at 8:02 am, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le lundi 8 octobre 2018, 10:22:38 CEST Tibor Digana a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 17 issues:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SUREFIRE/versions/12343425
> >
> > There are still a couple of
+1
Regards,
Hervé
Le lundi 8 octobre 2018, 10:22:38 CEST Tibor Digana a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SUREFIRE/versions/12343425
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1 (non-binding)
- Built from source zip RC on Oracle JDK8
- Run tests of several projects on OpenJDK11 using artifacts rebuild
from the ZIP
- Sha SUMs ok on the source zip
I have tried to run integration tests from the ZIP but without
success, this seems due to local problems to my box, so not
+1 (non-binding). Note: tested using fairly large project.
Regards,
Dejan Stojadinović
On 2018/10/08 08:22:38, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SUREFIRE/versions/12343425
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified SUREFIRE-1564 is fixed. I could run JUnit 5 and 4 tests
with `reuseForks=true`.
Thanks,
Akira
2018年10月8日(月) 17:22 Tibor Digana :
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SUREFIRE/versions/12343425
>
> There are still a couple of
Hi,
+1 from me
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 08/10/18 10:22, Tibor Digana wrote:
Hi,
We solved 17 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SUREFIRE/versions/12343425
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
@Enrico Olivelli
Let's switch these detailed talks to Slack chat or another mail topic in
ML.
Tibor
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:08 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il lun 8 ott 2018, 15:09 Tibor Digana .invalid>
> ha scritto:
>
> > Please don't run it like that.
> > See README file, just *run mvn
Il lun 8 ott 2018, 15:09 Tibor Digana
ha scritto:
> Please don't run it like that.
> See README file, just *run mvn install -P run-its*
>
Sure.
My concern is about running RAT
Enrico
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:48 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > I just downloaded the candidate source
Please don't run it like that.
See README file, just *run mvn install -P run-its*
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:48 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> I just downloaded the candidate source ZIP and:
> mvn apache-rat:check verify -Prun-its
>
> it should run cleanly, no ?
>
> Il giorno lun 8 ott 2018 alle
I just downloaded the candidate source ZIP and:
mvn apache-rat:check verify -Prun-its
it should run cleanly, no ?
Il giorno lun 8 ott 2018 alle ore 11:20 Christian Stein
ha scritto:
>
> ' .travis.yml' is excluded from 'rat-check' here:
>
>
' .travis.yml' is excluded from 'rat-check' here:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/blob/master/pom.xml#L605
Why does check fail and how did the 2.22.0 release handle the issue?
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 10:53 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Seems that apache-rat:check fails with:
>
> Files
Seems that apache-rat:check fails with:
Files with unapproved licenses:
.travis.yml
I guess this could be a blocker for the release
Enrico
Il giorno lun 8 ott 2018 alle ore 10:22 Tibor Digana
ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo