The marriage of eclipse and maven poses fundamental challenges that
don't exist for Intellij or Netbeans.
Of the three major Java IDE's, only Eclipse incorporates its own
classpath and compiler system. IJ and NB 'just run maven' and analyze
the output for display. Eclipse, on the other hand, actua
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> 2012/1/16 Arnaud Héritier :
> > Thanks a lot for this hard wok Barrie
> >
> > yes it was my problem too Robert.
> > ITs are now very difficult to use/maintain and sadly are covering only
> the
> > fact that what we generate is always the s
2012/1/16 Arnaud Héritier :
> Thanks a lot for this hard wok Barrie
>
> yes it was my problem too Robert.
> ITs are now very difficult to use/maintain and sadly are covering only the
> fact that what we generate is always the same and not that it is working in
> eclipse.
> As far as I remember this
No, our plugins have to be compatible with java 1.4 (which is the current
java version supported by maven 2.0.X).
Be careful to not use 1.5 APIs and syntax in your patch.
Arnaud
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Andreas Höhmann <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> can we add a
>
>
> The default settings for eclipse:eclipse and eclipse:m2eclipse set the
> outputs
> to the same. Does this actually work for people? Maybe locking on windows
> actually make a positive impact finally?
>
Yes, it works well. We have maven projects for 3 years (maven 1.x and maven
2) with developin
Igor Fedorenko wrote:
We've discussed this subject on m2e dev list a lot recently
Just to give the pointer:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/M2ECLIPSE/Separate+Eclipse+and+Maven+output+folders
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
We've discussed this subject on m2e dev list a lot recently and I
believe the conclusion is that both collocated and separate output
folders cause problems for some projects and development "styles", for
the lack of a better word.
For example, I mostly work with maven core and various maven pl
gin<http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&q=apt-maven-plugin>
>
> Looks like it's at codehaus.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Evan Worley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 5:40 PM
> To: Maven De
Google knows all:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&q=apt-
maven-plugin
Looks like it's at codehaus.
-Original Message-
From: Evan Worley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 5:40 PM
To: Maven Developers List
Sub
Does anyone know where the apt-maven-plugin can be found?
mvnrepository.comhas no entries for it.
Thanks,
Evan
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very cool! Thanks for sharing mark.
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
Very cool! Thanks for sharing mark.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Mark Hobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was curious about this too. Note that there is a goal in the
> apt-maven-plugin that aims to achieve this:
>
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/apt-maven-plugin/eclipse-mojo.html
>
> Mark
>
>
I was curious about this too. Note that there is a goal in the
apt-maven-plugin that aims to achieve this:
http://mojo.codehaus.org/apt-maven-plugin/eclipse-mojo.html
Mark
On 19/03/2008, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering who the active developers are on the m
No ;-)
I have to review this because I think also that it can be dangerous
Arnaud
On Feb 11, 2008 11:11 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed the 2.5-SNAPSHOT-21 .pom of the eclipse plugin uses version
> range
> for org.eclipse.core:resource dependency.
>
> Is there a good r
On 5/2/07, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The eclipse plugin currently requires code-generation plugins to attain the
generate-x phase.
To integrate the eclipse checkstyle plugin, we need to put the .checkstyle
file either in SVN or in the POM.
We put it in our top level POM for com
A proposal was submitted few months ago and I don't know how it is :
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CONTINUUM/Continuum+Eclipse+Plugin+proposal
A start implementation was done too.
You can contact rahul about it
Emmanuel
Marcel Soute a écrit :
Hi,
I have written a small eclipse plugin to vi
On 26 Dec 06, at 2:33 PM 26 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Did you noticed the strange error in the log?
Component descriptor cannot be found in the component repository:
org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-
plugin:test:eclipse.
I never got a similar error,
Did you noticed the strange error in the log?
Component descriptor cannot be found in the component repository:
org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoorg.apache.maven.plugins:maven-eclipse-plugin:test:eclipse.
I never got a similar error, do you have any idea where is that
"org.apache.maven.plugin.Mojoor
On 26 Dec 06, at 4:51 AM 26 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi Jason,
if you look at the logs in the build-output dir you will see that the
cause for the failure is simply the missing parent pom (version 7),
can you retry after installing/deploying it?
There are now two failures:
http://id
On 26 Dec 06, at 4:51 AM 26 Dec 06, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi Jason,
if you look at the logs in the build-output dir you will see that the
cause for the failure is simply the missing parent pom (version 7),
can you retry after installing/deploying it?
It's installed and deployed and I sti
It should of at the least taken it off my machine. It was installed
because I did the WAR plugin before that.
I'll try again. Is it trying to take it from the remote repo and not
the local repo? I could understand it not working if it wasn't
deployed to central but it should work if it's in
Hi Jason,
if you look at the logs in the build-output dir you will see that the
cause for the failure is simply the missing parent pom (version 7),
can you retry after installing/deploying it?
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[IN
I just discovered MECLIPSE-172 about this.
Is there any plan to include it into maven-eclipse-plugin 2.3 ?
Nico.
2006/12/12, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
The eclipse plugin allows to set custom classpathContainer. It will force
"org.eclipse.jdt.launching.JRE_CONTAINER" in this
MevenIDE's eclipse support is only for Maven 1.x, not Maven 2.x.
There's maven2 support for netbeans there only.
http://mevenide.codehaus.org/m2-site
Milos
On 11/12/06, techtonik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Can anybody clarify Eclipse 2 Maven relations? As a person far from
Maven develop
Good day,
Maven 2.x Eclipse Plugin is a Maven plugin which generates eclipse IDE
files (such as .classpath, and .project). Use this one if you prefer
to use maven2 directly and eclipse as and editor only (meaning you
edit via eclipse, but build via maven2 commandline)
Mergere Maven 2.x Plugin (a
On 11/12/06, ir. ing. Jan Dockx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, what he is asking is: "could somebody please explain calmly and
clearly to me what the status is of support for Maven inside eclipse
". Which eclipse plugins are available, which should I use, which are
defunct, and where are they rea
I'm not sure what problem he is having/why. The plugin page is pretty easy
to follow: http://maven.apache.org/eclipse-plugin.html
Add http://m2eclipse.codehaus.org/ to your eclipse update manager and you're
done. (besides the fact that you also need to install maven2 , which may be
the part he is
No, what he is asking is: "could somebody please explain calmly and
clearly to me what the status is of support for Maven inside eclipse
". Which eclipse plugins are available, which should I use, which are
defunct, and where are they really (the project, the source, the
eclipse update site
It seems like you're asking "How do I build XML-RPC inside of the
Eclipse IDE?", which is probably best asked on an XML-RPC list, not
the Maven developer's list.
The XML-RPC project uses Maven 2 for their builds, much like other
project would use an Ant script (or scripts). As such, if you want t
Jochen,
I got the patch installed and it appears to have fixed my problem and
working great!
Much Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jochen Kuhnle
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 1:59 AM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Eclipse plugin and
The trunk version preserves the builder's name, but not its triggers
and arguments. Patch http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MECLIPSE-139
mainly does something else, but also solves this problem (I hope
correctly ;-).
Regards,
Jochen
On 2006-08-23 02:35:39 +0200, "Barrie Treloar" <[EMAIL PROTECT
On 8/23/06, LaCasse, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It appears that running:
Mvn eclipse:eclipse
Wipes out any Eclipse builders that had been set up. And it doesn't
completely remove them it appears to remove everything except the name
which renders them useless and for some reason also un
s Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring
678.910.8017
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Vos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: Eclipse plugin
By the wa
By the way, it would also be nice t have some option to stop the classpaths
to libraries to the maven2 repository to be added to the .classpath file,
the maven2 plugin for eclipse doesn't like this ;).
On 1/30/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 -- I would also use this if it were
+1 -- I would also use this if it were available.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring
678.910.8017
- Original Message -
From: "Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.turbine.maven.devel
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 3:
On 10/12/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fabrizio,
>
> Are all of these features already in the m2 plugin from your earlier work?
All the new features added here are already in m2.
However at the moment there are features in the m2 plugin not included
in the m1 version and some fi
Hi Fabrizio,
Are all of these features already in the m2 plugin from your earlier work?
Thanks,
Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Author: fgiust
>Date: Sun Oct 9 09:50:48 2005
>New Revision: 310226
>
>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=310226&view=rev
>Log:
>committing MPECLIPSE-101 - aggreg
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-30 14:13]:
> Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/10/2003
> 02:47:50 AM:
>
> > > There is interest in distributing source and debug jars.
> >
> > It is something that I would look into doing with Maven, if it would
> > b
Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/10/2003
02:47:50 AM:
> > There is interest in distributing source and debug jars.
>
> It is something that I would look into doing with Maven, if it would
> be of use to Maven.
>
> > 1) I'm not thrilled with the naming convention u
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-30 10:46]:
> Martin Skopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/10/2003 06:27:56 PM:
>
> > On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > * Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28
>
> > > 02:57]:
> > > > > artifact
Martin Skopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 30/10/2003 06:27:56 PM:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > * Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28
> > 02:57]:
> > > > artifact-debug-1.0.jar
> > > > artifact-src-1.0.jar
> > > > artifact-doc-1.0.jar
* Martin Skopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-30 06:15]:
> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > * Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28
> > 02:57]:
artifact-debug-1.0.jar
artifact-src-1.0.jar
artifact-doc-1.0.jar
>> 2) There is
On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 19:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > * Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28
> 02:57]:
> > > artifact-debug-1.0.jar
> > > artifact-src-1.0.jar
> > > artifact-doc-1.0.jar
> > >
> 2) There is nothing in maven to create these artifacts yet. This shoul
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-29 14:26]:
> Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/10/2003
> 09:04:35 PM:
>
> > * Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28
> 02:57]:
> > > I've created an ant script that pulls and builds about a do
Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29/10/2003
09:04:35 PM:
> * Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28
02:57]:
> > I've created an ant script that pulls and builds about a dozen
> > dependencies for my project. Output goes to the local maven
> >
* Alain Javier Guarnieri del Gesu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-28 02:57]:
> I've created an ant script that pulls and builds about a dozen
> dependencies for my project. Output goes to the local maven
> repository. For each artifact, I create three files:
>
> artifact-debug-1.0.jar
> artifact-src-
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 21:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm planning on doing a release of the eclipse plugin to workaround the
> issues with the one in RC1.
>
> Any objections let me know ASAP.
Go for it, that's why they are separated!
> --
> dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
> Blog: htt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
eclipse:external-tools is for Eclipse < 2.1
eclipse:external-tools21 is for Eclipse >=2.1
thx dion, I naievely took the other assumption
(copying to users list since I badly woke up both lists)
regards,
-marc=
--
Marc Portierhttp://outertho
Marc Portier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/10/2003 08:30:00 AM:
> Hi all,
>
> have been doing my first tests with maven, most of it has been working
> as promised so I'm assuming the following is probably caused by some
> misunderstanding from my part.
>
> when testing all goals from the ecl
sorry, this is obvously a users@ question...
wasn't thinking, have reposted over there
regards,
-marc=
Marc Portier wrote:
Hi all,
have been doing my first tests with maven, most of it has been working
as promised so I'm assuming the following is probably caused by some
misunderstanding from my
49 matches
Mail list logo
