It's not political correctness (I've never been accused of that before), it's
just self interest in protecting myself against unintended imagery...
On Feb 22, 2014, at 3:31 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Ok, I promise never to poke fun if you promise never to never again use the
> word "hump" in a
You are overly politically correct. I should take offence!
On 22 February 2014 23:31, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Ok, I promise never to poke fun if you promise never to never again use
> the word "hump" in an email to this list.
>
> On Feb 22, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.co
Ok, I promise never to poke fun if you promise never to never again use the
word "hump" in an email to this list.
On Feb 22, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Stephen Connolly
wrote:
> Somehow with my brief emails you find some misinterpretation to take a hump
> at! Verbose or misunderstood... You decide ;-
On 22 February 2014 22:00, Baptiste Mathus wrote:
> +1 to dump Java5 compat. In about 2 months, even Java 6 will rapidly become
> old. We're already using Java 1.7 at our shop, and plan to migrate to 1.8
> asap. And we're really not a startup kind of company ;-). And I'm sure the
> features in 1.
+1 to dump Java 5.
Gary
Original message
From: Baptiste Mathus
Date:02/22/2014 17:00 (GMT-05:00)
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: Java 1.5
+1 to dump Java5 compat. In about 2 months, even Java 6 will rapidly become
old. We're already using Java 1.7 at our
+1 to dump Java5 compat. In about 2 months, even Java 6 will rapidly become
old. We're already using Java 1.7 at our shop, and plan to migrate to 1.8
asap. And we're really not a startup kind of company ;-). And I'm sure the
features in 1.8 (compared to the ones in the previous version) is gonna
ac
If a plugin depends on Maven 2.2.1 through 3.1.1 then we are stuck with Java 1.5
Hence my version policy that you lot are all ignoring commenting on... No
comments means I'll just put it up for a vote ;-)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 Feb 2014, at 20:10, "Arnaud Héritier" wrote:
>
> ;) AFAIR fo
Somehow with my brief emails you find some misinterpretation to take a hump at!
Verbose or misunderstood... You decide ;-)
Sent from my iPhone
> On 22 Feb 2014, at 20:03, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> Didn't we decide that everything can be 1.6? I remember because it was one of
> Stephen's overly
;) AFAIR for core yes. New releases (thus 3.2) should be certified 1.6+
For plugins it's another story I suppose depending of the version of maven core
they are supposed to support..
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Didn't we decide that e
Didn't we decide that everything can be 1.6? I remember because it was one of
Stephen's overly long emails :-)
jvz
> On Feb 22, 2014, at 11:02 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> How much longer with this Java 1.5 business? It' a giant pain.
>
> ---
I think we might just use animal sniffer to check such compatibility if we want
to keep it. Not 100% safe but enought to cover a respectable compatibility
My 2 cents
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> The business of being required to us
The business of being required to use it in all Maven releases, which
adds a layer of VM complexity to my process.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> Which business are you referring to?
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> How much longer wi
Which business are you referring to?
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> How much longer with this Java 1.5 business? It' a giant pain.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For
13 matches
Mail list logo
