Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-17 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 13, 2006, at 6:58 AM, John Casey wrote: Looks like this isn't an option unless we can make it work on Windows... Darn. I shot a note off to Greg the JPam guy to see what he's got going on there. At the very least, we use the API that Trygve proposes and create an implementatio

Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-17 Thread David Blevins
I like this more and more. -David On Jan 14, 2006, at 6:12 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 19:13 +0100, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features. I haven't looked at osuser in particular yet, but I still think it might work for

Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-13 Thread John Casey
Looks like this isn't an option unless we can make it work on Windows... From the documentation: Jpam can be used on: 1. Linux x86 2. Linux x86_64, including AMD64 3. Mac OS X 4. Solaris sparc PAM is used on Unix and Unix-like operating systems. JPAM should be readily portable to

Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-12 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
David Blevins a écrit : On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features. I tried to use osuser but this framework is crappy : [...] I looked at seraph too. This project seems to be interesting, it's used by confluence a

Re: Security in Continuum

2006-01-12 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, In 1.1, we have decided to rework all security features. I tried to use osuser but this framework is crappy : [...] I looked at seraph too. This project seems to be interesting, it's used by confluence and jira. It seems we have al