Re: snapshot dependency resolution

2007-08-09 Thread Nicky Sandhu
This is possibly a bug http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3144 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-3144 . The pom is updated but the jar remains untouched (except for timestamp touch). baerrach wrote: > > On 5/18/07, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Barrie, >> >> Have you tried runni

Re: snapshot dependency resolution

2007-05-17 Thread Barrie Treloar
On 5/18/07, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Barrie, Have you tried running with the "U" option? This forces maven to check for snapshot updates. If you don't specify the U option, maven will check for updates according to your snapshot update policy interval. I believe the default is o

Re: snapshot dependency resolution

2007-05-17 Thread Evan Worley
Barrie, Have you tried running with the "U" option? This forces maven to check for snapshot updates. If you don't specify the U option, maven will check for updates according to your snapshot update policy interval. I believe the default is once a day. -Evan On 5/16/07, Barrie Treloar <[EMAI

Re: snapshot dependency resolution

2007-05-16 Thread Barrie Treloar
On 5/17/07, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Zak, Your interpretation sounds correct, so I'm not sure why that happens incorrectly. Do you see this every time, or only in a clean repository? The metadata file is indeed used to determine the latest - check the lastUpdated timestamp ins

Re: snapshot dependency resolution

2007-05-16 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Zak, Your interpretation sounds correct, so I'm not sure why that happens incorrectly. Do you see this every time, or only in a clean repository? The metadata file is indeed used to determine the latest - check the lastUpdated timestamp inside the file. The locally installed version is