Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Mark Struberg
inal Message - > From: Jason van Zyl > To: Maven Developers List > Cc: > Sent: Saturday, September 1, 2012 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: the BuildContext > > > On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > >>     Hi

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
None of the code we have, and are using today, is bound to m2e. On Sep 1, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Robert Scholte wrote: > Op Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:40:11 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl : > >> >> On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >>>Hi! >>> >>> >>> While doing further research on th

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Robert Scholte
Op Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:40:11 +0200 schreef Jason van Zyl : On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi! While doing further research on the incremental build I came accross the org.sonatype.plexus.build.incremental.BuildContext. There are a few things around this class which ca

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Sep 1, 2012, at 6:21 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > > While doing further research on the incremental build I came accross the > org.sonatype.plexus.build.incremental.BuildContext. > > There are a few things around this class which caught my interrest. > > 1.) This class has a pac

Re: the BuildContext

2012-09-01 Thread Anders Hammar
1) Yes. :-) 2) I also quite surprisingly noticed this as well while converting a plugin to use BuildContext and making it m2e compatible. IMO it would be great if DefailtBuildContext could be improved so that will detect changes. However, there might be some good reason this hasn't been implemente