+1
I downloaded the source tarball and verified the signature matches KEYS. I
built from source, then rebuilt the source with itself without error on a clean
repository. I'll do some more testing, but that's sufficient for an alpha
release. Nice work!
Cheers,
Brett
On 10/11/2009, at 3:39 AM,
+1
Vincent
2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
We solved many issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14719
+1, seems to run well here.
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
We solved many issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14719
There are
?
- Message d'origine
De : Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Mar 10 Novembre 2009, 15 h 56 min 15 s
Objet : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3
Hi,
I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I'm not able to update
56 min 15 s
Objet : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3
Hi,
I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I'm not able to update to a
newer
SNAPSHOT that is available in my corporate repository, even by using the -U
command line option. It seems Maven is not even asking
OK, thanks
- Message d'origine
De : Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
À : Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Envoyé le : Jeu 12 Novembre 2009, 16 h 58 min 00 s
Objet : Re: Re : Re : [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-3
wagon weddav is not any more included in the distrib
+1
Hervé
Le lundi 09 novembre 2009, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit :
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
We solved many issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14
719
+1
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Paul Gier pg...@redhat.com wrote:
+1
I tested it on a few projects and in general it seems to be working well.
I ran into a problem resolving local snapshots with classifiers after I had
just installed them which appears to be related to an existing
+1
Tested with company builds.
Just a remark : the release note need to include some links to asf
wiki regarding compatibility and site plugin.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave
+1
On 2009-11-10, at 10:03 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
+1
Tested with company builds.
Just a remark : the release note need to include some links to asf
wiki regarding compatibility and site plugin.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
OK, here we go,
+1
Stéphane
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
wrote:
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
We solved many issues:
2009/11/10 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
We solved many issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14719
There are
+1 with my builds.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Hi,
I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I'm not able to update to a newer
SNAPSHOT that is available in my corporate repository, even by using the -U
command line option. It seems Maven is not even asking the repository manager
for a new version.
What's wrong?
mvn compile -U -X
Julien HENRY schrieb:
I don't know if it is related to Maven 3, but I'm not able to update to a newer
SNAPSHOT that is available in my corporate repository, even by using the -U
command line option. It seems Maven is not even asking the repository manager
for a new version.
If you have -U
It's clear that the consensus is against landing MNG-3004 for alpha-3, so
I'll pull back.
I've tested alpha-3 against several builds and found it good, thanks to
Benjamin's quick bugfixing last week.
+1
Dan Fabulich wrote:
I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this
Le Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:26:23 +0100,
Tony Chemit che...@codelutin.com a écrit :
Le Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:09 +0100,
Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit :
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive
Le Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:39:09 +0100,
Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit :
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
+1, but some of our plugins does not works any longer.
In the defect plugin,
Tony Chemit wrote:
Any idea about it ?
Sorry, not from those few bits of info. Please fill an issue at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with as much information attached as
available. I ideally need something to reproduce, so a minimal test
project or the SVN URL to your project with
Le Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:48:18 +0100,
Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu a écrit :
Tony Chemit wrote:
Any idea about it ?
Sorry, not from those few bits of info. Please fill an issue at
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with as much information attached as
available. I
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
If you have -U specified and the maven-metadata-nexus.xml for this
parent POM in your local repo is not updated to match the one in your
Nexus, that's indeed a bug. I'll look into it for alpha-4.
Confirmed and tracked in [0]. If you like, CI already produced a fixed
+1 on alpha 3 for my large corporate build (previously untested on 3.x
range). A nice 10% faster than 2.2.1 too.
+1
I tested it on a few projects and in general it seems to be working well.
I ran into a problem resolving local snapshots with classifiers after I had just
installed them which appears to be related to an existing problem ni 2.x [1].
But I had trouble reliably reproducing the without messing
+1 from me
2009/11/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Hi,
OK, here we go, another alpha release of Maven, for all those brave guys
that want to take it for a test drive ;-)
We solved many issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14719
+1
Tested with success on several projects
It becomes to be interesting :-)
Arnaud Héritier
Software Factory Manager
eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com
---
http://www.aheritier.net
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me
+0 (non binding)
I'm using m2eclipse from the trunk, using the embedded maven 3 from
the trunk, to build several in-house projects.
No problems for now
2009/11/9 Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com:
+1
Tested with success on several projects
It becomes to be interesting :-)
Arnaud Héritier
I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this
announcement should make it in to alpha-3.
I think if I vote -1 that will veto the release. I don't think that's
professional (I did just break the build three days before the release
vote, and I'm still quite ashamed by it),
On 10/11/2009, at 2:05 PM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
I just posted a proposal that the code I checked in before this
announcement should make it in to alpha-3.
I think if I vote -1 that will veto the release. I don't think
that's professional (I did just break the build three days before
I haven't tested alpha-3 yet, but I don't want to see anything derail that,
since it's been a long time coming. I think it would be better for issues
found after the last 11 months of changes to be separate from anything
introduced by a multi-threaded build.
Agreed. Unless you can attach the
29 matches
Mail list logo
