Re: Shade MX* classes from plexus-utils?

2008-03-28 Thread John Casey
It sounds like a fine idea to me. Not sure what else to say. -john On Mar 28, 2008, at 7:11 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: If I don't miss an aspect, we could narrow the exclusions for the shade plugin to org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.pull.Xml* to allow plugins to benefit from updates to the M

Re: Shade MX* classes from plexus-utils?

2008-03-28 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
If I don't miss an aspect, we could narrow the exclusions for the shade plugin to org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.pull.Xml* to allow plugins to benefit from updates to the MXParser and MXSerializer independently of Maven. What do you think? No thoughts on this? Benjamin --

Shade MX* classes from plexus-utils?

2008-03-16 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, today I learned that plexus-utils is not fully shaded in the core (MNG-2898, r522313). While I can understand the requirement to share Xpp3Dom and the Xml* APIs, I wonder why the MX* implementation classes cannot be shaded. These aren't part of any public method signatures shared with plugins