nd any API regarding modulepath.
Cheers
Tibor
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
FYI
--- Doorgestuurd bericht ---
Van: "Jonathan Gibbons"
Aan: jigsaw-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc:
Onderwerp: Re: Specifying module paths
Datum: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:22:30 +0
ibbons"
> Aan: jigsaw-...@openjdk.java.net
> Cc:
> Onderwerp: Re: Specifying module paths
> Datum: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:22:30 +0100
>
> Winding up this discussion ...
>
> While the use of a properties file to provide a mapping from module name
> to file system artifact ha
FYI
--- Doorgestuurd bericht ---
Van: "Jonathan Gibbons"
Aan: jigsaw-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc:
Onderwerp: Re: Specifying module paths
Datum: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:22:30 +0100
Winding up this discussion ...
While the use of a properties file to provide a mapping from module na
Hi Paul,
no, I'm not talking about multiple versions of the same module, that
subject is clear to me.
Alan described quite precise my issue (it's the first described usecase,
although the others are interesting as well). So it seems that if two
different modules export the same package, the
Robert, in the SOTM document, it explicitly calls out that Module systems
are not required to support multiple versions of a module. Correct me if
wrong, but I think you're hinting at that?
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> Op Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:45:32 +0100
On 15/01/2016 09:06, Robert Scholte wrote:
Suppose there's a logging module and a fat module, which also contains
the classes of the logging module, but older.
In my module-info I have
requires logging;
requires fat;
These modules are in the same directory. Which class is loaded first
Ask the Oracle :)
The classloader must validate the modulepath tree before loading the class
files. WDYT?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> Op Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:45:32 +0100 schreef Jonathan Gibbons <
> jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com>:
>
>
>>
>> On 01/14/2016 12:25 PM, e...
Op Thu, 14 Jan 2016 23:45:32 +0100 schreef Jonathan Gibbons
:
On 01/14/2016 12:25 PM, e...@zusammenkunft.net wrote:
Hello,
If I understood it correctly the modules on the MP must be unique and
are not merged, thats why the order inside the directory does not
matter for the named module
Cc: Maven Developers List
Sent: Do., 14 Jan. 2016 21:14
Subject: Re: Specifying module paths
Hi,
on the maven-dev list I've received a couple of responses.
The following comments are worth mentioning:
Igor Fedorenko says: "This is a very good proposal. My only suggestion is
Hi,
on the maven-dev list I've received a couple of responses.
The following comments are worth mentioning:
Igor Fedorenko says: "This is a very good proposal. My only suggestion is
to extend javax.tools CompilationTask API to take modulepath map as
in-memory parameter. Not a big deal, but i
Igor
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Robert Scholte wrote:
> FYI, a new idea to solve our modulepath issue.
> Any feedback is appreciated.
>
> thanks,
> Robert
>
> Forwarded Message ----
> Subject:
> Specifying module paths
> Date:
> Thu, 07 Jan
; thanks,
> > Robert
> >
> > Op Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:14:33 +0100 schreef Paul Benedict <
> > pbened...@apache.org>:
> >
> >
> > It sounds like Maven will have to generate many .properties file in
a
> >> build.
> >> 1) Modules
>
> > > thanks,
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > Op Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:14:33 +0100 schreef Paul Benedict <
> > > pbened...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > >
> > > It sounds like Maven will have to generate many .properties file in a
> > >> build.
&
0:14:33 +0100 schreef Paul Benedict <
> > pbened...@apache.org>:
> >
> >
> > It sounds like Maven will have to generate many .properties file in a
> >> build.
> >> 1) Modules to compile main source
> >> 2) Modules to compile test source
> &
uild.
>> 1) Modules to compile main source
>> 2) Modules to compile test source
>> 3) Modules to execute tests
>> 4) And what about forking?
>>
>> I am concerned #4 is going to create issues unless the .properties file
>> name is unique enough. Perhaps it can
new idea to solve our modulepath issue.
Any feedback is appreciated.
thanks,
Robert
---- Forwarded Message Subject: Specifying module paths
Date:
Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:39:43 -0800 From: Jonathan Gibbons
To:
jigsaw-dev
This is a follow-up to some of the recent email discussions r
. Perhaps it can be based on process id.
Cheers,
Paul
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Robert Scholte
wrote:
> FYI, a new idea to solve our modulepath issue.
> Any feedback is appreciated.
>
> thanks,
> Robert
>
> Forwarded Message ---- Subject: Specifying module
FYI, a new idea to solve our modulepath issue.
Any feedback is appreciated.
thanks,
Robert
Forwarded Message Subject:Specifying module paths
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:39:43 -0800
From: Jonathan Gibbons
To: jigsaw-dev
This is a follow-up to some of the recent
18 matches
Mail list logo
