Hi
The core ITs running under Windows in Jenkins is now operational.
The configuration is quite appalling in places, because Jenkins resolves
environment variables that are paths to Windows paths - not Java paths.
So they are only good for use in batch files, but not in system
properties for
Nice, thanks.
On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
The core ITs running under Windows in Jenkins is now operational.
The configuration is quite appalling in places, because Jenkins resolves
environment variables that are paths to Windows paths - not
On 11/12/2012 02:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I had a quick look at the Windows ITs and the problem seems to be that
Maven/Jenkins is unable to delete files. This looks like a Windows path
length issue, because the path it complain about is 264 chars long.
JENKINS-15418 [1] was fixed in
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jesse Glick jgl...@cloudbees.com wrote:
On 11/12/2012 02:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
I had a quick look at the Windows ITs and the problem seems to be that
Maven/Jenkins is unable to delete files. This looks like a Windows path
length issue, because the
I'll try to take a look at this one.
Kristian
2012/11/12 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com:
Hi,
personally I'd like to see at least one 3.x release that is again able to
calculate a proper build sequence. M3 is broken in this regard and you
cannot even rely on its results, because
If Kristian is going to take a look that's great. If I remember correctly when
I thought the EJB plugin might have been the source of problem.
On Nov 12, 2012, at 2:07 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com wrote:
Hi,
personally I'd like to see at least one 3.x release that is again
Anyone mind if I create a 3.1.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 version in JIRA?
I'm going to try and sort out what the next few releases might look like and to
help people see what the roadmap looks like so issues can be contributed (Jörg
and Anders for example).
On Nov 12, 2012, at 7:57 AM, Jason van Zyl
On 2012-11-11 05:58, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have more cycles now, so I'd like to propose a tentative release schedule
for the core and get some changes pushed out.
3.1.0 Release
I'd like to finish the following and then do a 3.1.0 release. I don't think
these changes should be conflated
Thanks for looking. I am Windows impaired :-)
On Nov 12, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2012-11-11 05:58, Jason van Zyl wrote:
I have more cycles now, so I'd like to propose a tentative release schedule
for the core and get some changes pushed out.
3.1.0
If I speed things up on MNG-5356, would anyone object to get that into
3.1.0 as well?
/Anders
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
I have more cycles now, so I'd like to propose a tentative release
schedule for the core and get some changes pushed out.
3.1.0
What I proposed is just tentative, I'm in no dire rush and with the logging
discussion firing up again I think you'll have time :-) But it would be nice to
have that in.
On Nov 11, 2012, at 7:19 AM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
If I speed things up on MNG-5356, would anyone object
IMHO, this doesn't sound really risky feature, so I don't see any reason why
not to include it in the next version
Regards,
Hervé
Le dimanche 11 novembre 2012 13:19:01 Anders Hammar a écrit :
If I speed things up on MNG-5356, would anyone object to get that into
3.1.0 as well?
/Anders
Am 11/11/12 05:58, schrieb Jason van Zyl:
I have more cycles now, so I'd like to propose a tentative release schedule
for the core and get some changes pushed out.
3.1.0 Release
I'd like to finish the following and then do a 3.1.0 release. I don't think
these changes should be conflated
Hi,
personally I'd like to see at least one 3.x release that is again able to
calculate a proper build sequence. M3 is broken in this regard and you
cannot even rely on its results, because it uses and packs stale SNAPSHOTs.
Therefore we're still locked to M221. However, first plugins start to
I have more cycles now, so I'd like to propose a tentative release schedule for
the core and get some changes pushed out.
3.1.0 Release
I'd like to finish the following and then do a 3.1.0 release. I don't think
these changes should be conflated with the Eclipse Aether addition, or the
m-s-u
15 matches
Mail list logo
