+1. Using M2E almost daily (i.e. when doing Java programming).
M2E has been improving a lot since its beginning. And has been stable for
us for many years already.
The biggest issue at that time was actually generally not M2E itself, but
the M2E-WTP /bridge/ which was indeed way more unstable
Hi Michael,
it was half forgotten, half intended. My original idea was to donate it to
MojoHaus and once they made there first release we could do final release
here and refer to the the maintainers.
However, MojoHaus hasn't found someone to maintain it over there. Other
argument: sources
Op Fri, 25 Dec 2015 13:09:26 +0100 schreef Michael Osipov
:
Robert,
just read the discussion on mojohaus-dev. Does this actually mean that
you need to respin to vote for complete retirement? I would do so.
I don't see a reason for a respin of the vote: we decided to
Robert,
just read the discussion on mojohaus-dev. Does this actually mean that
you need to respin to vote for complete retirement? I would do so.
I would continue as instructed by our retirement plan, issue, final
release with notice. Moreover, I would add warning log output to every
mojo
Am 2015-12-25 um 14:25 schrieb Robert Scholte:
Op Fri, 25 Dec 2015 13:09:26 +0100 schreef Michael Osipov
[...]
I would continue as instructed by our retirement plan, issue, final
release with notice. Moreover, I would add warning log output to every
mojo that this plugin has been retired.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Yeah, I've avoid m2e until the other day to see if it got any better. Not.
> So your solution is to switch IDEs... hm, not a huge fan of IJ... is there
> an Eclipse-like Java Perspective? I find file based editing
>
> Do those of you who are Eclipse users find m2e adequate?
I've successfully used m2e for many years on many different systems
(different customers). I suggest asking about any issues on the m2e users
list.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> I'm
Yeah, I've avoid m2e until the other day to see if it got any better. Not.
So your solution is to switch IDEs... hm, not a huge fan of IJ... is there
an Eclipse-like Java Perspective? I find file based editing retarded.
Gary
On Dec 25, 2015 12:49 PM, "Benson Margulies"
Op Fri, 25 Dec 2015 21:37:55 +0100 schreef Gary Gregory
:
I'm still surprised that no one wants to maintain this. Do those of you
who
are Eclipse users find m2e adequate? I don't. Unless I do not know how to
set it up. For example, importing the log4j2 projects
I'm still surprised that no one wants to maintain this. Do those of you who
are Eclipse users find m2e adequate? I don't. Unless I do not know how to
set it up. For example, importing the log4j2 projects creates some projects
with errors.
Gary
On Dec 24, 2015 2:44 PM, "Michael Osipov"
Eclipse's single classpath makes it fundamentally broken with any maven
project that has test dependences. So some of us bailed to intellij long
ago. m-e-p has one set of incurable issues, and m2e, while much improved,
can still eat all your memory on a moderate project.
We've watched the lack
Hi Robert,
back in October the result of the retirement vote [1] was positive.
The plugin is still online without notice, issues are still open in JIRA
and no repo is at GitHub.
Did you simply forget that?
Michael
[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40maven.apache.org/msg107104.html
12 matches
Mail list logo