From a testing perspective I find this discussion interesting; failsafe
has *minute* amounts of code which is distinct from surefire, and most
of this
is just the boilerplate stuff needed because reusing mojos is hard.
Most of the current IT coverage in surefire only runs with the surefire
plu
On 1/18/12 4:33 PM, John Casey wrote:
On 1/18/12 2:01 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Do we need corresponding tests for this on failsafe
Yeah, probably. I'll take a look at that today/tomorrow. I'm working on
SUREFIRE-803 now, and having some trouble getting the ITs to find the
failsafe plugin in
On 1/18/12 2:01 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Do we need corresponding tests for this on failsafe
Yeah, probably. I'll take a look at that today/tomorrow. I'm working on
SUREFIRE-803 now, and having some trouble getting the ITs to find the
failsafe plugin in the build...I suppose figuring that
Do we need corresponding tests for this on failsafe
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On Jan 18, 2012 5:54 p.m., wrote:
> Author: jdcasey
> Date: Wed Jan 18 17:
