No one is objecting on 3.1 so I'll bump the version on trunk.
/Anders
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Ping
--
Olivier
Le 10 sept. 2012 09:02, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org a écrit :
Le 9 sept. 2012 15:44, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io a écrit :
I
We're still awaiting some test coverage on the new features. If I'm
doing the next release (which I've announced) I'll bump the version
number when the tests are in place. The next release is still a few
weeks off, so there should be plenty of time for that.
Kristian
2012/9/16 Anders Hammar
Ok. I was just thinking as we've decided to go with 3.1 the version in
trunk should indicate that. But I'll leave it as 3.0.5-SNAPSHOT then.
/Anders
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:
We're still awaiting some test coverage on the new
Ping
--
Olivier
Le 10 sept. 2012 09:02, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org a écrit :
Le 9 sept. 2012 15:44, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io a écrit :
I noted in the issue where the tool is and there's a standard Maven
plugin page there. Probably as well documented as how to do it with Plexus
:-)
Le 9 sept. 2012 15:44, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io a écrit :
I noted in the issue where the tool is and there's a standard Maven
plugin page there. Probably as well documented as how to do it with Plexus
:-)
For sure and I agree on that :-) (as responsible of that fact too :-) )
But as we
Perso due to this change I'm more for a 3.1 (it's just a matter of
jiras bulk change :-) )
2012/9/9 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org:
It looks to me the changes fit more a 3.0.5
I always had in mind, that with the 3.1 we would make the pom-parser more
strict meaning:
- don't warn but fail
+1 for 3.1
On 2012-09-07 22:19, Anders Hammar wrote:
I know. But there wasn't much visible change in v3.0 either. And I'm
thinking that it would be easier to communicate a dependency on Maven
3.1+ than 3.0.5+ if some component utilizes the JSR330 support.
Version numbers are cheap. Why not
+1 for 3.1
On 10 September 2012 21:19, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
+1 for 3.1
On 2012-09-07 22:19, Anders Hammar wrote:
I know. But there wasn't much visible change in v3.0 either. And I'm
thinking that it would be easier to communicate a dependency on Maven
3.1+ than
Cool.
I think core-it is mandatory too for such new feature !
2012/9/9 Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io:
Here they are:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5343
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5344
On Sep 7, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Maybe I miss something but we don't
Anyone -1 of bumping to v3.1 for core?
/Anders
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on bump to 3.1
On Friday, 7 September 2012, Anders Hammar wrote:
I know. But there wasn't much visible change in v3.0 either. And I'm
thinking that it
It looks to me the changes fit more a 3.0.5
I always had in mind, that with the 3.1 we would make the pom-parser more
strict meaning:
- don't warn but fail for plugins without versions
- don't warn but fail for duplicate dependency entries
(there are probably more...)
Robert
Op Sun, 09 Sep
2012/9/3 jvan...@apache.org:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep 3 01:07:31 2012
New Revision: 1380105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1380105view=rev
Log:
o Enabled support and discovery of JSR-330 components
o Added Slf4j logger factory to support generic JSR-330 logging
o Exported
I noted in the issue where the tool is and there's a standard Maven plugin page
there. Probably as well documented as how to do it with Plexus :-)
I have a series of posts I'm writing which can be the basis of documentation.
Code here[1], and the documentation is here[2].
[1]:
Minds are, like rules, meant to be broken. :-) That could go into 3.2
just as well.
But, being the newest boy in town I won't push this too much.
/Anders
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
It looks to me the changes fit more a 3.0.5
I always had in
+1 on bump to 3.1
On Friday, 7 September 2012, Anders Hammar wrote:
I know. But there wasn't much visible change in v3.0 either. And I'm
thinking that it would be easier to communicate a dependency on Maven
3.1+ than 3.0.5+ if some component utilizes the JSR330 support.
Version numbers are
Here they are:
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5343
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5344
On Sep 7, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Maybe I miss something but we don't have any associated jira entry for
reference in release notes neither core it test.
Do you have a bit of
Maybe I miss something but we don't have any associated jira entry for
reference in release notes neither core it test.
Do you have a bit of time for that ?
Thanks
--
Olivier
2012/9/3 jvan...@apache.org:
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep 3 01:07:31 2012
New Revision: 1380105
URL:
Maybe this even should bump the version to v3.1?
/Anders
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Maybe I miss something but we don't have any associated jira entry for
reference in release notes neither core it test.
Do you have a bit of time for that ?
Thanks
There are no visible user changes, so I don't think so. There aren't even any
changes to integrators unless they want to use take advantage of the changes.
On Sep 7, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
Maybe this even should bump the version to v3.1?
/Anders
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at
I know. But there wasn't much visible change in v3.0 either. And I'm
thinking that it would be easier to communicate a dependency on Maven
3.1+ than 3.0.5+ if some component utilizes the JSR330 support.
Version numbers are cheap. Why not bump and get some attention? :-)
/Anders
On Fri, Sep 7,
Subject: svn commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./ apache-maven/
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/ maven-embedder/
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep 3 01:07:31 2012
New Revision: 1380105
URL: http
.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: jvan...@apache.org jvan...@apache.org
To: comm...@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 3:07 AM
Subject: svn commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./
apache-maven/ maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven
: Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org; Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./ apache-maven/
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm
commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./
apache-maven/ maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/
maven-embedder/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep 3 01:07:31 2012
New Revision: 1380105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./
apache-maven/ maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/
maven-embedder/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
I'm not seeing log4j-over-slf4j in the dependency
: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./
apache-maven/ maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/
maven-embedder/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep 3 01:07:31 2012
New Revision: 1380105
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1380105view
To: comm...@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 3:07 AM
Subject: svn commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./
apache-maven/ maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/
maven-embedder/ maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep
...@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 3:07 AM
Subject: svn commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./ apache-maven/
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/ maven-embedder/
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Sep 3 01:07:31 2012
commit: r1380105 - in /maven/maven-3/trunk: ./ apache-maven/
maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/classrealm/ maven-embedder/
maven-embedder/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/cli/
FWIW, we are using sfl4j and logback as part of m2e embedded maven
runtime for over a year now without any major
29 matches
Mail list logo
