Request to Maven Site Plugin

2010-03-12 Thread Markus Milcher
Dear Developers, currently i am working with Maven and first of all: Thanks! It's a very nice program and makes all easier. Right now i am configuring the site-plugin but have got a problem and i hope you are able to help me. In the category dependencies is the dependencie tree. Is it possible

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

2010-03-12 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 On 11 March 2010 18:46, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: +1 Hervé Le mardi 09 mars 2010, Benjamin Bentmann a écrit : Hi, We solved 22 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16 087 There are still a couple of issues left in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

2010-03-12 Thread Vincent Siveton
+1 Vincent 2010/3/9 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu: Hi, We solved 22 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16087 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Missing signatures for the wagon 1.0-beta-2 artifacts

2010-03-12 Thread Anders Hammar
While implementing a Maven environment for a customer where the signatures for used Apache artifacts are verified, I've stumbled upon the fact that the artifacts of wagon 1.0-beta-2 aren't signed. As all other versions (1.0 alphas and betas) have signatures, I'm confused. Does anyone know

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Merlin
+1 Tested on corporate and oss projects, working fine. /Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

2010-03-12 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1 -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved 22 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=16087 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1 Staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-7

2010-03-12 Thread Brett Porter
+1 Downloaded the source tarball, checked signature, and built it using Maven 2.2.1, then ran the integration tests: Tests run: 561, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 991.96 sec Thanks! BTW, it's interesting that the source tarball is larger than the binary one due to the

Latest maven-scm-plugin 1.4-SNAPSHOT broken

2010-03-12 Thread Dan Tran
Hello, My experimental build just pull down latest maven scm and see this error. Did we break this or it is just a bad jar?? i am using maven 2.2.1 and java 6 [INFO] [scm:checkout {execution: checkout-webservices}] [FATAL ERROR] org.apache.maven.scm.plugin.CheckoutMojo#execute() caused a

Re: Latest maven-scm-plugin 1.4-SNAPSHOT broken

2010-03-12 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, How can I reproduce this ? Which scm are you using ? 2010/3/12 Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com: Hello, My experimental build just pull down latest maven scm and see this error.  Did we break this or it is just a bad jar?? i am using maven 2.2.1 and java 6 [INFO] [scm:checkout {execution:

Re: Latest maven-scm-plugin 1.4-SNAPSHOT broken

2010-03-12 Thread Dan Tran
I am using subversion where I call scm:checkout in my pom -Dan On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, How can I reproduce this ? Which scm are you using ? 2010/3/12 Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com: Hello, My experimental build just pull down latest maven

Re: Latest maven-scm-plugin 1.4-SNAPSHOT broken

2010-03-12 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Dan Tran wrote: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.maven.scm.provider.ScmProviderRepository.setPushChanges(Z)V at org.apache.maven.scm.plugin.AbstractScmMojo.getScmRepository(AbstractScmMojo.java:286) Sounds like you don't have the latest snapshot version of maven-scm.

Re: Latest maven-scm-plugin 1.4-SNAPSHOT broken

2010-03-12 Thread Dan Tran
I had to expired the cache on my nexus' apache-snapshot repo. Now by build is ok. nexus may have picked up a bad deployment, and it would take a day to get the next one. -Dan On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu wrote: Dan Tran wrote: