elharo commented on pull request #208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/208#issuecomment-703898696
Thanks!
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
elharo merged pull request #208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/208
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
+1 none-binding
However, I still see random compilation failure at my multiple thread
build. I am hoping the latest maven-resolver would make it go away :-)
Thanks
-D
On Sun, Oct 4, 2020 at 3:16 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> this time, I could reproduce the build, done with JDK 8 on
slawekjaranowski opened a new pull request #208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/208
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
moving the plugin to release profile, then have a release build different from
the usual SNAPSHOT build does not look a good idea
if we need to avoid building with JDK 7 because JDK 8 is required, it's up to
Jenkins file to select
We already do that for Maven Artifact Transfer for example
Maarten and I took a look at the failing projects today and have restored
the matrix of JDKs and Maven versions in the Jenkins pipelines. Windows
hosts apparently do not have JDK 16 installed. I've added a comment in
INFRA-20576 [1].
"maven-wagon" was failing because of recent changes to the
After reading the DigitalOcean update again, I noticed that I made a
little mistake in interpreting their rules.
From the contributor perspective, PRs count if:
Submitted during the month of October AND (
The PR is labelled as hacktoberfest-accepted by a maintainer OR
Submitted in a repo
elharo opened a new pull request #207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-site/pull/207
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
I think this is a nice opportunity to get more people onboard and I am
willing to spend more time reviewing PRs this month. As Maarten mentions,
we do not have to have all PRs finished in October, they only have to be
marked as 'hacktoberfest-accepted' so that gives us extra time. I do agree
it
