Hi,
Now we have resolved all planned issues.
If nobody sees issues with the old version of checkstyle I
propose postponed for next release.
Another case is upgradining modello-maven-plugin - I've created an issue
for it [1], need more opinion, and also can be postponed for next release.
[1]
+1
Le jeu. 31 mars 2022 à 14:35, Tibor Digana a
écrit :
> Hi,
>
> We solved 111 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12344613
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 22:36, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 111 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12344613
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
Hi,
- build ok from source-releases
- signed ok, by key 0xAE9E53FC28FF2AB1012273D0BF1518E0160788A2
- wrong jenkins url [1]
- PMD has errors instead of reports with exposed local path of source [2]
- tag list reports is empty [3]
[1]
+1 tested with a large build running both unit and integration tests in
production using 3.0.0-M6-SNAPSHOT (not easy for us to pickup staging)
-D
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 2:07 PM Sylwester Lachiewicz
wrote:
> +1
>
> czw., 31 mar 2022, 14:35 użytkownik Tibor Digana
> napisał:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
+1
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022, 23:31 Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12343770=Text=12317224
>
> There are still one issue left in JIRA:
>
>
Hi,
All issues for version 26 seem to be resolved.
I don't see more issues for AFS parent 26.
Of course please somebody else check.
niedz., 13 mar 2022 o 20:42 Michael Osipov napisał(a):
> Am 2022-03-13 um 20:26 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another plugins that have newer
Am 2022-04-03 um 11:53 schrieb Slawomir Jaranowski:
Hi,
All issues for version 26 seem to be resolved.
I don't see more issues for AFS parent 26.
Thank you for the hard work!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Thank You guys.
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Tibor Digana, Tamás Cservenák, Slawomir Jaranowski, Romain
Manni-Bucau, Christian Stein, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Delany, Sylwester
Lachiewicz, Dan Tran, Olivier Lamy, Arnaud Héritier, Hervé BOUTEMY
PMC quorum: accomplished.
I
Thank You guys.
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Tibor Digana, Tamás Cservenák, Slawomir Jaranowski, Romain
Manni-Bucau, Christian Stein, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Delany, Sylwester
Lachiewicz, Dan Tran, Olivier Lamy, Arnaud Héritier, Hervé BOUTEMY
PMC quorum: accomplished.
I
hm, I do not understand his change regarding PR #49.
The CI result is used to fail due to the Socket timeout. The same has
happened in the latest surefire result vote. The build was red, we tried to
restart the build for 3 days, and finally the build got green at the end of
the Vote.
Instead of
Regarding the next 4 reports out of 5:
Test report
Checkstyle report
PMD report and
Taglist report
we should use the Sonar Cube as a substitution and the development +
release process should take the Sonar into account on the fly.
Then I would understand the purpose of removal.
But now I don't!
+1
The issues mentioned by Slawomir should be fixed after the release is
complete. Those issues are not a typical blocker.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 11:31 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
>
>
+1
sha512 ok
build ok
T
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 5:36 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12350902=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1734/
>
>
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 08:51, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Regarding the next 4 reports out of 5:
>
> Test report
> Checkstyle report
> PMD report and
> Taglist report
>
> we should use the Sonar Cube as a substitution and the development +
> release process should take the Sonar into account on the
+1
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 at 07:31, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12343770=Text=12317224
>
> There are still one issue left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 01:36, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12350902=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1734/
>
>
It is a nice report in Jenkins but still this cannot be compared with Sonar.
Anyway, guys, feel free to continue in this discussion.
T
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 2:26 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 08:51, Tibor Digana wrote:
>
> > Regarding the next 4 reports out of 5:
> >
> > Test
Almost all our components use custom report list to build site. And also
becouse we skip tests for release build - our subpage for reports is empty.
Sylwester
pon., 4 kwi 2022, 02:32 użytkownik Tibor Digana
napisał:
> It is a nice report in Jenkins but still this cannot be compared with
>
+1
build checked reproducible: reference done with JDK 11 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 2 avril 2022, 23:06:04 CEST Sylwester Lachiewicz a écrit :
> +1
>
> pt., 1 kwi 2022, 23:31 użytkownik Karl Heinz Marbaise
>
> napisał:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 10 issues:
> >
> >
Hi,
We solved 2 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12350902=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1734/
+1
build checked reproducible: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 2 avril 2022, 15:48:59 CEST Tibor Digana a écrit :
> +1
>
> T
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 2:35 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 111 issues:
> >
> >
-1
I read them sometimes
and they don't cost anything
please just ignore them if you don't use them
On 2022/04/03 20:46:19 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have plans for the next release for parents poms.
>
> Maybe I will be boring, but I still do not see any values for some of the
>
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 06:46, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have plans for the next release for parents poms.
>
> Maybe I will be boring, but I still do not see any values for some of the
> reports for static documentation sites of components.
>
> Result of tests during release time has
Hi,
We have plans for the next release for parents poms.
Maybe I will be boring, but I still do not see any values for some of the
reports for static documentation sites of components.
Result of tests during release time has no value after some time. Important
is the current result of tests on
+1
Sylwester
niedz., 3 kwi 2022, 22:46 użytkownik Slawomir Jaranowski <
s.jaranow...@gmail.com> napisał:
> Hi,
>
> We have plans for the next release for parents poms.
>
> Maybe I will be boring, but I still do not see any values for some of the
> reports for static documentation sites of
26 matches
Mail list logo
