Hi guys,
I've been trying to nut this out for a couple of days now and need your
help. A few weeks ago I wrote a Junit4 plugin which works perfectly in the
test phase. It doesn't fork or anything fancy, just gets on with the job.
It's header contains the following annotations:
* @requiresDepende
On 6 Feb 07, at 10:49 PM 6 Feb 07, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 2/6/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doing the staging is not overly convenient but I can document that as
well if we want to enforce staging. You basically have to install
Maven on people.apache.org and install the reposito
Hi all,
I've just found this thread as a result of checking through the wiki page I
wrote on getting started with Archiva.
Thanks to Wendy for added a quick comment or I would have not know there was
an issue.
I think this whole episode just highlights the problems with not having
proper rel
On 2/6/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doing the staging is not overly convenient but I can document that as
well if we want to enforce staging. You basically have to install
Maven on people.apache.org and install the repository tools plugin
and use it from your account on the Maven
Good day, Graham,
See inline comments.
On 2/6/07, Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For example, the following profile doesn't match anything on MacosX:
activate-mac
macosx
${os.arch}
Mac OS X
On 07/02/2007, at 11:58 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 6 Feb 07, at 5:54 PM 6 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
what is the status on this?
Actually in the short term what's there will work without staging
with one small change. Basically point the staging repository to
the real repository unt
On 6 Feb 07, at 5:54 PM 6 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
what is the status on this?
Actually in the short term what's there will work without staging
with one small change. Basically point the staging repository to the
real repository until we get the repository copying working. So if
th
Any objections?
I think it is logically belonged there.
-D
On 6 Feb 07, at 5:54 PM 6 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
what is the status on this?
there are plugin releases waiting for it. I think we should make the
release Brett suggested and then with more time do another one if
needed.
Actually on the repository copying Joakim was going to help me tr
On 6 Feb 07, at 5:54 PM 6 Feb 07, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
what is the status on this?
Just working on the repository copying/merging but the rest of it
works. If someone wants to release something now then I can flip it
back to releasing directly but I wanted to move toward having a real
what is the status on this?
there are plugin releases waiting for it. I think we should make the
release Brett suggested and then with more time do another one if
needed.
On 1/31/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 31 Jan 07, at 12:30 PM 31 Jan 07, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> +0 on th
I mailed erik directly on this exception a little bit ago but I
figured I would check if anyone else had run into something like this
before.
my analysis of this turned up that it appears to have failed on
getting a new sequence number for the ChangeFile object of a
BuildResult that was getting s
Hi,
This make me think that maybe, there is 2 concepts hidden in the
element: project-kind and project-deliverable.
For example we could have a class library packaged in a jar file.
But we also could have that same class library packaged in a zip file.
Or we could have a java application packag
I've had this exact same problem yesterday but I thought it was me
doing something wrong...
It looks like a bug and I think a jira should be opened.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:58 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to use profile activation based on OS to work
ar
Hi all,
I've been trying to use profile activation based on OS to work around
maven's lack of support for exposing the OS family (you can test against
the current OS family, you just cannot find out what the current OS
family is using ${maven.os.family} or some equivalent, or it least it
seem
On Jan 30, 2007, at 6:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
This sort of thing can be addressed in the assembly plugin itself
(though it requires true which is a bit gross, but
hopefully we can fix that in 2.1 anyway).
I've thought about this before, but stumbled on the 'which type'
question.
I t
On 5 Feb 07, at 1:43 PM 5 Feb 07, Gary Kind wrote:
I need to zip up a source directory subtree within my pom.xml.
Probably the best place to do this for me would be in the compile
phase or when using the surefire plugin to to mvn test. How do I
do this? I tried the assembly plugin, but
I'm back home today, so I'll roll it again today and work on the
release stuff as I go. Everything except for the repository copying
from the stage to production repository is working.
Jason.
On 6 Feb 07, at 7:34 AM 6 Feb 07, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
Is there any new info on the state of th
Is there any new info on the state of the m2.0.5 release?
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
Brett Porter schreef:
Can you try the build extension one with the latest snapshot from the
branch? I think I already fixed it.
- Brett
On 26/01/2007, at 8:03 PM, Fabrice Bellingard wrote:
Yes, I
I did not saw this one, thanks. Seems like a lot of people are
interested in solving this issue :-)
I add a comment, just in case.
--
OQube < software engineering \ génie logiciel >
Arnaud Bailly, Dr.
\web> http://www.oqube.com
---
You're right - it is hardcoded. See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-141
Tom
On 2/6/07, Arnaud Bailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi to all,
I wish to extend maven-surefire with a new provider. As far as I can
tell from the plugin's source code, this is not possible without
modification
Hi to all,
I wish to extend maven-surefire with a new provider. As far as I can
tell from the plugin's source code, this is not possible without
modification of the plugin's code as providers are hardcoded in the
constructSurefireBooter() method. BTW, this explains
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/S
22 matches
Mail list logo