Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Saturday 17 March 2007 23:31, Brian E. Fox wrote: > I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-3 > > Tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-pl >ug in-2.0-alpha-3/ > > Staged at: > http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository > > Ch

Re: [vote] Merge 2.1-lifecycle-refactor branch back to maven trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Milos Kleint
very cool. +1 Milos On 3/20/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 To be able to order correctly is a big improvement. Also very cool is that we can now query and inspect what will happens before it executes. One more step of providing declarative outputs for plugins and we will know

Re: maven-enforcer-plugin

2007-03-19 Thread Jason Dillon
Just throwing this out there... but why not just use Jexl to allow expression like "mavenVersion == 1.2" to be evaluated? I just saw the table of range to meaning and this just popped into my head... like why do you need some extra syntax when you could just evaluate an expression? --jas

Re: maven-enforcer-plugin

2007-03-19 Thread Jason Dillon
Seems a wee bit odd that you have "enforcer:enforce" which handles maven version and java version, then "enforcer:os" which handles os stuff. I'd rather have enforcer:require-maven, enforcer:require- java, enforcer:require-os, * I'm also not keen on the version range muck... but I guess its

RE: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
Just need one more PMC -Original Message- From: John Casey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 9:40 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3 This looks really nice. It gets my enthusiastic +1. :-) Thanks, john On 3/17/

maven-enforcer-plugin

2007-03-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
There is a new plugin that I'd like to get some feedback on, particularly on non-windows os's and the unit tests. The maven-enforcer-plugin picks up where leaves off and allows control over the maven, jdk and os versions of a build. This plugin was initially conceived here: http://www.na

Re: Logging reform for 2.0.6?

2007-03-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 19 Mar 07, at 10:00 PM 19 Mar 07, Jason Dillon wrote: Aight... I'm happy for it to be in 2.0.7. Not sure I have time to patch it into 2.0.6... though in many cases simply changing log.info to log.debug should work ;-) If you like I can look into the patches for inclusion into 2.0.7.

Re: Logging reform for 2.0.6?

2007-03-19 Thread Jason Dillon
Aight... I'm happy for it to be in 2.0.7. Not sure I have time to patch it into 2.0.6... though in many cases simply changing log.info to log.debug should work ;-) If you like I can look into the patches for inclusion into 2.0.7. --jason On Mar 19, 2007, at 6:04 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:

2.0.6 update

2007-03-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, So just to recap where we are with 2.0.6. We have a couple issues left, I'm still converting some proprietary builds into ITs so that we can use them, I'm also using one that Jorg put together in an issue. MNG-1577 will go in, Torsten is cleaning up the Minijar plugin for us so that w

Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread John Casey
This looks really nice. It gets my enthusiastic +1. :-) Thanks, john On 3/17/07, Brian E. Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-3 Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-plug in-2.0-alpha-3/ Staged at: http://pe

Re: [WIKI] Archiva Roadmap & Design

2007-03-19 Thread John Tolentino
Hi Joakim, I'd like to add a web application to deploy new artifacts into the repository (MRM-305). This matches #3 in http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Requirements. It appears that no one's been doing something like this but I could be mistaken. Also, there are differences in

Re: [vote] Merge 2.1-lifecycle-refactor branch back to maven trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 To be able to order correctly is a big improvement. Also very cool is that we can now query and inspect what will happens before it executes. One more step of providing declarative outputs for plugins and we will know everything that could happen which will make IDE integration very awe

RE: [vote] Merge 2.1-lifecycle-refactor branch back to maven trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1. I tried this out and the output is much better than what we currently have: Summary view: Build Plan: 1. org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-clean-plugin:2.1:clean [executionId: default] 2. org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-plugin-plugin:2.2:descriptor [executionId: def ault] 3. org.apache.maven.plug

Re: Logging reform for 2.0.6?

2007-03-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 19 Mar 07, at 8:15 PM 19 Mar 07, Jason Dillon wrote: Any chance that the logging reform documented here will get into 2.0.6? http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2823 Nope, too late. I'll schedule it for 2.0.7. I'm working on the last couple issues, and then it's out the door. Unless

Re: Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Marcelo Fukushima
im not sure but i think in order to change the amount of memory the tests can use, you have to configure the surefire plugin - changing the amount of memory maven uses dont take effect on tests (i think they are ran on a separate jvm) On 3/19/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: it's

RE: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-plugin 2.3

2007-03-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
+1 -Original Message- From: Dennis Lundberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 6:43 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: [VOTE] Release maven-plugin-plugin 2.3 Hi, I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin-2.3. There is only one issue fixed for this release, but it's

Logging reform for 2.0.6?

2007-03-19 Thread Jason Dillon
Any chance that the logging reform documented here will get into 2.0.6? http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2823 --jason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Archetypes] plugin proposition

2007-03-19 Thread Ole Ersoy
Awesome! Incidentally does your plugin have the ability to evaluate the maven name element when it processes the archetype templates? There is a patch for the current archetype plugin here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-55 But if yours does it already, I'm skipping the patching and

Re: Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
it's set in MAVEN_OPTS env var with -Xmx and -Xms java options, but if you don't know it, you probably use the default jvm options. You can try to it to something like that: MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx256m If you don't want to patch Continuum, you can use a prebuilt snapshot: http://maven.zones.apache.org

Re: Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Graham Leggett
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: how many memory is allocated to the build? Normally the default is enough. No idea - checked out a pristine copy of trunk as of an hour or two ago, and did an mvn install. Is there somewhere where memory allocations are set, perhaps in a pom file? Regards, Graham --

Re: Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
how many memory is allocated to the build? Normally the default is enough. Graham Leggett a écrit : Emmanuel Venisse wrote: jdk version? Latest MacOSX version, jdk v1.5.0_07-164. Regards, Graham --

Re: Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Graham Leggett
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: jdk version? Latest MacOSX version, jdk v1.5.0_07-164. Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[VOTE] Release maven-plugin-plugin 2.3

2007-03-19 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, I'd like to release maven-plugin-plugin-2.3. There is only one issue fixed for this release, but it's an important one. It adds support for @since tags for mojo parameters. This is an important improvement to our plugin documentation: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?r

Re: Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
jdk version? Graham Leggett a écrit : Hi all, While trying to build trunk of continuum, I am getting the following test failure on MacosX v10.4: --- Test set: org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuil

Test failure on trunk

2007-03-19 Thread Graham Leggett
Hi all, While trying to build trunk of continuum, I am getting the following test failure on MacosX v10.4: --- Test set: org.apache.maven.continuum.buildcontroller.DefaultBuildControllerTest -

Re: [Archetypes] plugin proposition

2007-03-19 Thread Raphaël Piéroni
Hi, I added it on my todo list. Raphaël 2007/3/19, Ole Ersoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi Raphael, Sounds like you are doing some terrific work. If you have time, could you please take a look at this bug: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2856 When the current archetype plugin processes png i

Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Brian E. Fox a écrit : I'd like to release maven-dependency-plugin:2.0-alpha-3 Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/tags/maven-dependency-plug in-2.0-alpha-3/ Staged at: http://people.apache.org/~brianf/staging-repository Changes: This release adds 2 new goals: depe

Re: [Vote] Release maven-dependency-analyzer 1.0-alpha-1 shared component

2007-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
+1 Emmanuel Brian E. Fox a écrit : I'd like to release the alpha 1 version of this shared component. The analyzer scans through your class files and produces a list of dependencies declared but not used, dependencies used but not declared, and dependencies actually used. Maven-dependency-plugin

Re: [vote] Commit privs for Ralph Goers

2007-03-19 Thread John Casey
+1 (late, I know) -j On 3/19/07, Joakim Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 - Joakim Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the massive overhaul that was MNG-1577 I wanted to also to > ask for commit privs for Ralph. Much of my recent work has been with > Patrick on getting MNG-1577 int

War plugin and Overlays handling

2007-03-19 Thread Stephane Nicoll
Hi, Piotr and I are currently working on the war plugin and especially this overlay mechanism that needs to be upgraded. Currently a couple of issues [1] in the war plugin are linked to this functionality and we should really address them. The idea here is to provide a better way to handle overl

[WIKI] Archiva Roadmap & Design

2007-03-19 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
Just a quick note to other Archiva Developers that the Product Roadmap and Design docs are being updated on wiki (Confluence) The Roadmap:: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Archiva+Roadmap I think we might need to split up the roadmap to 1.0-alpha, 1.0-beta, 1.0-rc, and finally 1.0. WDY

Re: [vote] Commit privs for Ralph Goers

2007-03-19 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
+1 - Joakim Jason van Zyl wrote: > Hi, > > As part of the massive overhaul that was MNG-1577 I wanted to also to > ask for commit privs for Ralph. Much of my recent work has been with > Patrick on getting MNG-1577 into the codebase, but Ralph also did a > great deal of work and when looking at th

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

2007-03-19 Thread Thierry Lach
for what my opinion matters, I'm in favor of the bi-weekly schedule. On 3/19/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ok, I am changing my tune on the remaining 11 issues, I want this thing released asap so we have something concrete to get moving on. The 11 issues are functionally no rea

Re: Adding default OSGi information to JARs

2007-03-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Monday 19 March 2007 16:12, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > afaik they passed the vote to graduate Oh yea. Forgot about that and google still brings up their incubator page as the first hit (which still says it's undergoing incubation). Guess they need to upgrade the incubator sites to let people

Re: Adding default OSGi information to JARs

2007-03-19 Thread Carlos Sanchez
afaik they passed the vote to graduate On 3/19/07, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One more thing to take into consideration: Felix is in incubation. Thus, as of right now, the plugin cannot go to central. Feel free to complain about that on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-) Dan On Mo

Re: Adding default OSGi information to JARs

2007-03-19 Thread Daniel Kulp
One more thing to take into consideration: Felix is in incubation. Thus, as of right now, the plugin cannot go to central. Feel free to complain about that on [EMAIL PROTECTED]:-) Dan On Monday 19 March 2007 16:03, Carlos Sanchez wrote: > I'm still waiting for a big patch to be a

Re: Adding default OSGi information to JARs

2007-03-19 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I'm still waiting for a big patch to be applied https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-199 And they need to make a release also. I'll take a look at the performance On 3/19/07, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is mostly directed at Carlos, Just following up on the discussion

Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1

2007-03-19 Thread Jesse McConnell
ok, I am changing my tune on the remaining 11 issues, I want this thing released asap so we have something concrete to get moving on. The 11 issues are functionally no real different then a lot of the ones in the -2 jira so I am thinking we just push that forward and get going on this. so, I have

Adding default OSGi information to JARs

2007-03-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
This is mostly directed at Carlos, Just following up on the discussion we have at EclipseCon. Have you check the performance of the Felix plugin? If it doesn't add any significant overhead to people building their JARs due to the analysis performed by BND, and it is entirely non-invasive th

Lifecycle Goal for Injecting POM Parameters?

2007-03-19 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hi, I posted this on maven users, but did not get a reply, so I hope that it's ok that I ask here. I created a mojo and gave it a lifecycle for a specific packaging. After I did this, the mojo stops receiving pom parameters. I'm assuming there is a specific goal that I have to run per the

Re: Eclipse PDE questions/suggestions

2007-03-19 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hi Markus, I need to play with the PDE feature of the eclipse plugin more, but I did write an archetype for generating baseline eclipse documentation plugins that you can see here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/sandbox/oersoy/documentation.checklist.parent It's actually a checkl

Eclipse PDE questions/suggestions

2007-03-19 Thread Markus Wiederkehr
I have a two questions regarding the Maven Eclipse plugin and especially its PDE mode... 1) I would like to use ${groupId}.${artifactId} instead of the artifact ID alone as project name in .project and (more importantly) as Bundle-SymbolicName in META-INF/MANIFEST.MF. Is this possible? 2) In PDE

RE: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Brian, Brian E. Fox wrote on Monday, March 19, 2007 1:25 PM: > The analyze goal has already been merged into the plugin and > is the same here... it does the class level analysis. There > is also analyze-dep-mgt to do the 1577 check. Analyze will do > both so there's no clash here. Take a look

Re: svn commit: r519796 - in /maven/doxia/trunk/doxia-core/src: main/java/org/apache/maven/doxia/validation/ test/java/org/apache/maven/doxia/validation/

2007-03-19 Thread Juan F. Codagnone
On Sunday 18 March 2007 23:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: jvanzyl > Date: Sun Mar 18 19:23:13 2007 > New Revision: 519796 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=519796 > Log: > o removing dead code that i put in with the twiki code > > > Removed: > > maven/doxia/trunk/doxia-

Re: MNG-2433

2007-03-19 Thread Jason van Zyl
On 19 Mar 07, at 7:03 AM 19 Mar 07, Kenney Westerhof wrote: I know that legacy repositories keep getting pinged on each build, even if they're just updated. Is there also no network traffic when legacy repo's are in the repo list? For that I'm not sure, there was no mention of legacy reposit

RE: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Brian E. Fox
The analyze goal has already been merged into the plugin and is the same here... it does the class level analysis. There is also analyze-dep-mgt to do the 1577 check. Analyze will do both so there's no clash here. Take a look at the site: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-dependency-plugin/

RE: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
Max Bowsher wrote on Monday, March 19, 2007 12:00 PM: > Jörg Schaible wrote: >> It is very unfortunate, that you took the same goal that was >> introduces by the maven-dependency-analyzer-plugion, that is >> currently merged in the sandbox in a branch. > > TTBOMK, ?? > it is not possible for o

Re: MNG-2433

2007-03-19 Thread Kenney Westerhof
I know that legacy repositories keep getting pinged on each build, even if they're just updated. Is there also no network traffic when legacy repo's are in the repo list? -- Kenney Brett Porter wrote: On 19/03/2007, at 11:36 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote: Yah, I saw the logging which is why I used

Re: [VOTE] maven-dependency-plugin 2.0-alpha-3

2007-03-19 Thread Max Bowsher
Jörg Schaible wrote: > It is very unfortunate, that you took the same goal that was introduces > by the maven-dependency-analyzer-plugion, that is currently merged in > the sandbox in a branch. TTBOMK, it is not possible for one plugin to implement foobar:alpha and another to implement foobar:beta