I took a look and the patch is quite out of date and didn't apply
straight up for me. It does have tests though so with any luck I'll
get a closer look at the hackathon tomorrow.
The good news (sort of) is that Surefire has very few changes
committed since the last release, so a release
Hi,
I came across what I think is a bug in the EAR plugin (version 2.4). Since I
am not a registered contributor I cannot file this bug in JIRA myself, but I
felt I want to share this with you anyway and perhaps, after verification,
you can decide whether or not you will create the issue.
What
Hi to all,
I just added a job on our Hudson server to build Maven 3.0 from the trunk.
The job use maven 2.2.1 and a custom repository (to avoid collisions
with our others projects).
Goals are clean install and MAVEN_OPTS is set to -Xmx512m
No problem when I use a Sun JVM Java 5.
But if I select
A note on this one.
Build works with an IBM SDK 6.
2009/11/3 Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com:
Hi to all,
I just added a job on our Hudson server to build Maven 3.0 from the trunk.
The job use maven 2.2.1 and a custom repository (to avoid collisions
with our others projects).
Goals are
2009/11/2 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
2009/11/2 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com:
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-runtime-1.0-alpha-2/
The above link is broken for me, even using the Apache Proxy :-(
It wasn't synced when I sent the email, but it's
I have the same problem. Can someone shine a light on this?
With regards,
Nick Stolwijk
~Java Developer~
IPROFS BV.
Claus Sluterweg 125
2012 WS Haarlem
http://www.iprofs.nl
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Julien HENRY henr...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi,
I have a multimodule project and it fails
Henri Gomez wrote:
Caused by: org.apache.maven.shared.filtering.MavenFilteringException
at
org.apache.maven.shared.filtering.DefaultMavenFileFilter.copyFile(DefaultMavenFileFilter.java:130)
at
Henri Gomez wrote:
Caused by: org.apache.maven.shared.filtering.MavenFilteringException
at
org.apache.maven.shared.filtering.DefaultMavenFileFilter.copyFile(DefaultMavenFileFilter.java:130)
at
Hi,
This second attempt now inherits maven-shared-components:14 to fix the
site skin problems.
We solved 2 issues:
- Added support for introspecting URLs to MavenRuntime
- Added url to parsing exception messages
There are no issues left in JIRA:
Hi there,
Has anyone got any objections to rolling a Checkstyle 2.4 release?
The big addition in this version is MCHECKSTYLE-105 [1] which upgrades
Checkstyle to 5.0, and thus is compatible with Java 5. Several users
have been using 2.4-SNAPSHOT successfully for a while now without
problems,
Hi Julien,
Is it working with 2.6 and not with 2.6.1?
We have several its [1], specifically MJAVADOC-181, all seems to work.
So please create an issue [2] with a test case and your log files, we
will be able to track it.
Thanks,
Vincent
[1]
Hi André,
Thanks for the notification. You can freely create an account on
jira.codehaus.org and you will have access. I am bit surprised about the
regression because the only thing we changed is JavaEE6 support but I'll
double check if some regression was not introduced.
Thanks,
Stéphane
On
Hi,
maven-reporting-impl:2.0.4.3 should be release to be able to write
single report, ie mvn checkstyle:checkstyle See MSHARED-120
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/11/3 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com:
Hi there,
Has anyone got any objections to rolling a Checkstyle 2.4 release?
The big addition in
a sample project demonstrating the problem is essential here. I've tried to
reproduce but always ended up with the display name being first.
Thanks
Milos
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Stephane Nicoll
stephane.nic...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi André,
Thanks for the notification. You can freely
Hi,
This is a maintenance release to fix MSHARED-120.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-013/
Staging site:
http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-reporting-impl-2.0.4.3
Guide to testing staged releases:
+1
2009/11/3 Mark Hobson markhob...@gmail.com:
Hi,
This second attempt now inherits maven-shared-components:14 to fix the
site skin problems.
We solved 2 issues:
- Added support for introspecting URLs to MavenRuntime
- Added url to parsing exception messages
There are no issues left in
Hi Benjamin,
What's the JIRA for this problem (and fix in r832389) ?
I'd like to verify if this bug could affect some of ours projects
Regards
2009/11/3 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Caused by: org.apache.maven.shared.filtering.MavenFilteringException
FYI:
After upgrading our IBM SDK 1.5 to SR10 (build pxi32dev-20090707
(SR10 ), maven-3 from trunk build with maven 2.2.1.
SDK is now :
java version 1.5.0
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
pxi32dev-20090707 (SR10 ))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.3, J2RE 1.5.0 IBM J9 2.3 Linux x86-32
Henri Gomez wrote:
What's the JIRA for this problem (and fix in r832389) ?
I'd like to verify if this bug could affect some of ours projects
There is no JIRA because it's not a bug in Maven itself. As visible from
the mentioned SVN revision, the failure to build Maven was due to a
corrupt
Stephane Nicoll wrote at Dienstag, 3. November 2009 14:10:
Hi André,
Thanks for the notification. You can freely create an account on
jira.codehaus.org and you will have access. I am bit surprised about the
regression because the only thing we changed is JavaEE6 support but I'll
double
We are not using that there as far as I know but I'll check anyway
Thx
Sent from my iPhone
On 03 Nov 2009, at 15:49, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Stephane Nicoll wrote at Dienstag, 3. November 2009 14:10:
Hi André,
Thanks for the notification. You can freely create an
Hey guys,
Who's coming at the devoxx conference this year?
_o/
S.
--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one, you
suck -- S.Yegge
when?
where ?
what is being presented?
pricetag?
Martin
__
Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung
Diese Nachricht ist vertraulich. Sollten Sie nicht der vorgesehene Empfaenger
sein, so bitten wir hoeflich um eine Mitteilung. Jede unbefugte
Oh, I thought it was well known enough. Ever heard of Javapolis? :) - 16th
to 20th Nov, Antwerp - Belgium
You'll find everything on the website (http://www.devoxx.com). If I am not
mistaken, Jason has a BOF on Maven3. Nicolas might come. That's all I know.
On a more personal note, I believe this
Yeah, I wasn't sure if that patch was still good (or if it ever was).
Thanks for taking a look a it!
-David
On Nov 3, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
I took a look and the patch is quite out of date and didn't apply
straight up for me. It does have tests though so with any luck I'll
Hi,
Seems like the source-release assembly is working pretty well,
particularly now that Benjamin refined it. IMO it's stable enough for us
to add the configuration to the ASF parent POM, so other projects can
benefit.
If nobody has an objection, I'll port this configuration over and stage
On 2009-11-03, at 17:50-something, Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
2009/11/2 Jason van Zyl ja...@sonatype.com
I'm sure we could find a clean place to inject an override for the
default
version of the compiler plugin in 3.x and then use that version of
Maven
to
build as many on the grid as we
Yes, we now have the source bundle issue resolved, just upgrade to the
latest maven parents...and we are still using Nexus where you staged
it last time ;-)
2009/11/3 Raphaël Piéroni raphaelpier...@gmail.com:
Hello Benjamin,
I am really sorry for not having concluded the release process (yet).
Hello Benjamin,
I am really sorry for not having concluded the release process (yet).
But at that time there was a blocking issue (releasing the source).
Also at that time i got no time to upgrade my release process to get the
source artifact.
Hence i got taken n work during the summer and part
+1, a few people here at the hackathon have asked it to be promoted so
they can benefit on other ASF projects.
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:05 PM, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org wrote:
Hi,
Seems like the source-release assembly is working pretty well, particularly
now that Benjamin refined it.
I am working on a patch to surefire and find that habitually I'm
consistently grabbing got my 's and java 5 for loops. I see the
following seems to apply:
Some surefire-providers have an implicit java 5 requirement because
(like junit 4) they support java 5 projects.
But what language levels are
31 matches
Mail list logo
