On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote:
On 2010-08-12 09:26, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1
While we're discussing the war plugin, if anyone is interested to work on
it
a bit more, it would be much appreciated: users have reported a lot of
issues and some
+1
On 16 August 2010 07:34, Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
wrote:
On 2010-08-12 09:26, Stephane Nicoll wrote:
+1
While we're discussing the war plugin, if anyone is interested to work
on
it
+1
Emmanuel
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi,
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=16372
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Hi,
I've noticed that the uniqueVersion attribute of the release plugin is
effectively ignored for Maven 3, which is preventing me from upgrading at
present. In my shop we use this plugin to upload a SNAPSHOT version of our
code to Nexus, which a UNIX script then downloads to a server and
This type of questions are more appropriate for the users list. I'm
including that as well. Please just respond to that mailing list.
From what I know, uniqueVersion is always true for Maven 3 and there is no
planned support for non-unique versions. Other people has asked the same,
but nobody has
Search the mailing archives.
IIRC Brian Fox said that it was too complex to handle when they were
initially rewriting the artifact resolution code... and nobody has been
interested in adding back the support, but Brian said that if somebody was
interested in adding support back in then (as long
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result :
+1 (binding): Benjamin Bentmann, Oliver Lamy, Herve Boutemy
+1 (non binding): Tony Chemit, Kristian Rosenvold, Stephen Connolly,
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
+1
2010/8/15 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
Hi,
We solved 7 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=16372
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Surefire, version 2.6
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes the
unit tests of an application, the maven-surefire-report-plugin, which
parses surefire/failsafe test results and renders them to DOXIA
creating the web
Can a PMC please confirm that the Surefire 2.6 release has been added to the
board report?
Thanks,
-Stephen
Stephen Connolly wrote:
Can a PMC please confirm that the Surefire 2.6 release has been added to the
board report?
ACK.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Why has SUREFIRE-536 still not been fixed?
It was originally reported against 2.4.3
On 16 August 2010 15:19, Stephen Connolly steph...@apache.org wrote:
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of Surefire, version 2.6
This release includes the maven-surefire-plugin, which executes
Does the issue have a patch?
Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and
negative testing?
Is the patch against the latest code base?
Is the patch formatted using the Maven code style?
Does the patch exclude formatting changes on lines not affected by the patch?
If the
On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the issue have a patch?
It does now.
Many thanks to Stevo Slavic.
Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and
negative testing?
AFAIK.
Is the patch against the latest code base?
On 16 August 2010 23:15, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the issue have a patch?
It does now.
Many thanks to Stevo Slavic.
Does the patch include integration tests that cover positive and
negative testing?
I just added a new comment to MNG-4751 regarding this issue:
http://bit.ly/9TaV3D
Basically - a work-around solution would be to allow -SNAPSHOT resolution
for artifacts that are currently part of a reactor process.
--
Pull me down under...
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Benjamin
patch applied r986189.
On 16 August 2010 23:50, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2010 23:15, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 August 2010 16:00, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the issue have a patch?
It does now.
Many
17 matches
Mail list logo
