Re: [site] missing project name prefix in title in the generated page

2011-12-07 Thread Lukas Theussl
Which version of site-plugin-2.x are you comparing with? I would expect 2.3 to be equivalent with 3.0. -Lukas Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi all guys, while redeploying the Cocoon3 site, using mvn3+site-plugin:3.0, I noticed a big difference in the generated page using mvn2+site-plugin:2.X,

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread John Casey
I've tried it out on a few relatively tame builds...failsafe and dependency plugins being about the most exotic things tested. Everything looks like it's functioning well here. I'll try to take it out for a more aggressive test run today. On 12/5/11 9:28 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hello,

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread Jesse Glick
FYI - NetBeans nightly development builds [1] are now bundling RC3, to shake out problems in either the embedded APIs or general usage. [1] http://bits.netbeans.org/download/trunk/nightly/latest/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: svn commit: r1211230 - in /maven/skins/trunk/maven-fluido-skin/src: it/mskins-16/ it/mskins-16/pom.xml it/mskins-16/src/ it/mskins-16/src/site/ it/mskins-16/src/site/site.xml main/resources/META-I

2011-12-07 Thread Robert Scholte
Hi Simone, there are still a few issues in Jira left, which I can pick up. Next I'll have to verify that all issues of reskinning a site are covered. One thing I'm missing is IT-verifications, something which can check values of attributes or tags. For instance: are the width and height of

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread Olivier Lamy
Jesse, First huge thanks for your tests, that's very important for us to have feedbacks. But please note it's *not* an official release so this will never be distribute as an official Apache Maven release. It's only a rc build to get feedbacks from users. The staged repository will be deleted (at

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread Marvin Froeder
FWIW, 3.0.4-RC3 didn't worked with a custom repository layout Like http://kthoms.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/how-to-register-a-custom-maven-repository-layout/ I did not pin down the problem yet, but seems a regression from 3.0.3. On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org

Preferred language for verify scripts in integration tests of plugins

2011-12-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I see, that mojo regularly uses groovy scripts for the verifiy step in integration tests of plugins. However maven plugins seem to use bsh, which is a pain compared to groovy. Are maven-plugins not allowed to use groovy for these tests? Regards Mirko --

Re: Preferred language for verify scripts in integration tests of plugins

2011-12-07 Thread Olivier Lamy
2011/12/7 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com: Hello, I see, that mojo regularly uses groovy scripts for the verifiy step in integration tests of plugins. However maven plugins seem to use bsh, which is a pain compared to groovy. Are maven-plugins not allowed to use groovy for these

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread Olivier Lamy
2011/12/7 Marvin Froeder velo...@gmail.com: FWIW, 3.0.4-RC3 didn't worked with a custom repository layout Like http://kthoms.wordpress.com/2009/10/13/how-to-register-a-custom-maven-repository-layout/ I did not pin down the problem yet, but seems a regression from 3.0.3. How do you get that

Apparent bug in the artifact resolver, where does it go in JIRA?

2011-12-07 Thread Benson Margulies
Code in a plugin at CXF calls artifactResolver.resolve(artifact, remoteRepos, localRepository) and gets an impossible answer (the 'classes' directory when the artifact in question is of type 'wsdl'). Where does this live? All the way over at Eclipse, or somewhere else?

Re: Apparent bug in the artifact resolver, where does it go in JIRA?

2011-12-07 Thread Brett Porter
In terms of reporting, if it doesn't work in Maven, it goes in MNG, regardless of where the code at fault might be... whoever comes to fix it may need to file a bug with Aether too, but at first glance that looks like something that's within Maven code. - Brett On 08/12/2011, at 10:19 AM,

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread Jesse Glick
On 12/07/2011 02:04 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: please note it's *not* an official release so this will never be distribute as an official Apache Maven release. It's only a rc build to get feedbacks from users. Yes of course. This is only temporary until another RC or a final build is published -

Re: Apparent bug in the artifact resolver, where does it go in JIRA?

2011-12-07 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Are you running inside m2e by any chance? -- Regards, Igor On 11-12-07 6:19 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: Code in a plugin at CXF calls artifactResolver.resolve(artifact, remoteRepos, localRepository) and gets an impossible answer (the 'classes' directory when the artifact in question is of type

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-07 Thread Mark Derricutt
I'm +1ing this - have been doing releases all day without issue. Someone did make a comment about memory usage the other day, I am seeing OOM exceptions more often in my large reactor build under the RC, but that's mostly Rhino stuff that has an evil leak in it. I did see a Permgen in Javac

I've staring at an apparent m3 regression from m2, how about a bit of coaching as to how to track it down?

2011-12-07 Thread Benson Margulies
MSITE-623 describes the situation, but, in fact, it's not MSITE at all. In the case at hand, the artifact resolver is returning the current target/classes pathname that goes with the 'jar' artifact as the answer to a question about the 'wsdl' artifact. Maven 2.2.1 does fine. Where do I start?

Re: svn commit: r1211624 - in /maven/skins/trunk/maven-fluido-skin/src: it/mskins-13/ it/mskins-13/pom.xml it/mskins-13/src/ it/mskins-13/src/site/ it/mskins-13/src/site/site.xml main/resources/META-I

2011-12-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hello Robert! thanks for your enthusiasm on fluido! :) About the searchbar on top, I would like to reach that[1] rendering - I'll try to work on it tomorrow (today I'm off for the bigger part of the day) Thanks again! Simo [1] http://imageshack.us/f/17/screenshot20111208at848.png/