Hi Lukas!
thanks for your feedback, I'm filling the issue right now!
All the best, have a nice day,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Lukas Theussl
Hi again,
just to let you know the issue is DOXIASITETOOLS-65
Thanks a lot in advance for your help!!!
All the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:31 AM,
Perhaps if the SCM was GIT instead of SVN it could be faster ?
It's not a short term solution but it can be another reason to use Git ASAP.
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote:
Hi all!
thanks for the feedbacks - we are using indeed the
Hi
Rat now has a variety of components built using a variety of tools in
a variety of languages.We're looking to move to Apache CMS at the
project level, integrating Maven site builds into subversion. The
extension mechanism plugging subversion into wagon scm seems to be a
little buggy. Easier to
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all guys,
ASF requirements for new incubating podlings requires that sites are managed
* via the SCM
* via svnpubsub
Do you have any links to something that says that, I didn't think
there were any
Hello,
I tend to say wagon-scm is very low on unit/it tests.
Sources are here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/wagon/trunk/wagon-providers/wagon-scm/
BTW I think it's a *very* slow mode to publish a maven site.
Regarding it test, the best is probably to provide a sample project
which
Salut Arnaud,
yes via Git is fast, I am using the
org.kathrynhuxtable.maven.wagon:wagon-gitsite and I can confirm it is
faster than SVN!
All the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
Hi Ant :)
I got a reply from danielsh on JIRA[1] that simpli didn't allow me
publishing the site via scp. I would really appreciate if you could
help me to fix the misunderstanding, if any!!!
Thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4329
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Salut Arnaud,
yes via Git is fast, I am using the
org.kathrynhuxtable.maven.wagon:wagon-gitsite and I can confirm it is
faster than SVN!
Not for really big sites. it takes forever.
All the best!
-Simo
2012/1/18 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Simone Tripodi
simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
Salut Arnaud,
yes via Git is fast, I am using the
org.kathrynhuxtable.maven.wagon:wagon-gitsite and I can confirm it is
faster than SVN!
Not for really big
Do we need corresponding tests for this on failsafe
- Stephen
---
Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
screen
On Jan 18, 2012 5:54 p.m., jdca...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jdcasey
Hi all guys,
I am here to propose the RC2 Maven Skins version 6, that includes
* Maven Application Skin 1.0
* Maven Default Skin 1.1
* Maven Classic Skin 1.1
* Maven Stylus Skin 1.4
* Maven Fluido Skin 1.1
We solved 16
On 1/18/12 2:01 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Do we need corresponding tests for this on failsafe
Yeah, probably. I'll take a look at that today/tomorrow. I'm working on
SUREFIRE-803 now, and having some trouble getting the ITs to find the
failsafe plugin in the build...I suppose figuring that
On 1/18/12 4:33 PM, John Casey wrote:
On 1/18/12 2:01 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
Do we need corresponding tests for this on failsafe
Yeah, probably. I'll take a look at that today/tomorrow. I'm working on
SUREFIRE-803 now, and having some trouble getting the ITs to find the
failsafe plugin
+1
-Robert
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:32:54 +0100, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
wrote:
+1 non-binding
Tested Snapshot deploy to Codehaus Nexus. Tested that site now works
out-of-the-box (MNG-5221, MNG-5225). Also verified using new Maven
version properties in jar manifest (MNG-4112).
+1 binding
Tested on a few work and personal projects with no regressions noted.
Not doing anything particularly complicated in those builds.
Wayne
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the
+1
The new javadoc plugin works fine for me.
On 01/17/2012 02:18 PM, John Casey wrote:
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11138version=17354
There are still plenty of issues left in JIRA:
+1
--
Olivier
Le 17 janv. 2012 21:19, John Casey jdca...@commonjava.org a écrit :
Hi,
We solved 8 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/**secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?**
projectId=11138version=17354http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11138version=17354
There are still plenty
18 matches
Mail list logo
