Hi guys,
is there any maven github plugin (or any plan)? the goal would be to get
what we have with gem for instance in ruby world to be able to clone a repo
from the build to consider it as a dependency.
For java (and script jsr in particular) it would be great to get an
additional step:
Wouldn't scm:bootstrap work?
--
-- Aldrin Leal, ald...@leal.eng.br
Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta
http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 6:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
is there any maven github
looks close yes, didn't know it, then playing with some file operation can
work
thanks
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
Awesome! Thanks again, still need to go a bit deeper but it works:
https://github.com/rmannibucau/landslide-maven-plugin/blob/master/pom.xml
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
Use the exec plugin?
-Chris
Sent from my iPhone
On 03/06/2013, at 7:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
is there any maven github plugin (or any plan)? the goal would be to get
what we have with gem for instance in ruby world to be able to clone a repo
from
scm plugin is what i was looking for, exec plugin was not portable enough
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github:
I wonder if commons-vfs does offer some scm functionality. If it doesn't,
it would be just as amazing...
--
-- Aldrin Leal, ald...@leal.eng.br
Master your EC2-fu! Get the latest ekaterminal public beta
http://www.ingenieux.com.br/products/ekaterminal/
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Romain
All nice ideas, but let's go back to a real usecase:
Let's assume we're having an issue with componentX-1.4
If you weren't one of the testers, then this dependency was pulled from
Maven Central. You can check out the code as specified in the tag, etc.
etc. No issues here.
But if you were one
Now the issue with componentX-1.4 that you wan to test is one that only
shows up behind your corporate proxy, and you have a system set up with the
failing case and you dare not change anything...
So you add the staging repo to your mirror, run the test case, and drop the
test artifact from the
Github user mfriedenhagen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/23
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Github user mfriedenhagen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/24
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Although it is slightly off-topic (I assumed our Apache environment), but
also in this case: as long as componentX-1.4 was staged and not released,
developers must adjust their settings.xml to test componentX-1.4.
So they should be aware that this component was not released and should
remove
If you add apache staging to your corp proxy
and expose that to everyone you are mixing test and production.
/me dislikes the concept.
The way I usually solve this is to have an additional
corp repo-url that exposes the regular internal repo
*and* staging. This url is used to test staging.
(I
On Monday, 3 June 2013, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
If you add apache staging to your corp proxy
and expose that to everyone you are mixing test and production.
/me dislikes the concept.
The way I usually solve this is to have an additional
corp repo-url that exposes the regular internal repo
Write this scenario up in the trouble shooting notes on how to test
staging releases.
I fit into the behind corporate proxy category but I have not had
this problem (I use Kristian's solution).
Admittedly the effort required to configure the corporate proxy for a
staging url is often enough to
Um, did I miss something, but what is a unreleased (ie for it to be pulled,
then it has to be right?) artifact doing in central to start with?
-Chris
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote:
All nice ideas, but let's go back to a real usecase:
Let's assume
16 matches
Mail list logo