Re: [VOTE] Release maven-jarsigner 1.1

On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:48:32 +0100 Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Could we get two more binding votes, please :) thanks, tony. +1 My checks: - builds with JKD7 and JDK5 - builds with Windows 7 - Rat check is clean - sha1 is de491abe498134e92ca50570ad5d78e6afe15bf4

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-jarsigner 1.1

+1 Sorry, I created a new Jira issue :) Regards, Hervé Le samedi 9 novembre 2013 09:10:47 Tony Chemit a écrit : Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18134styleName=Tex tprojectId=11761 There are no more issues left in JIRA :) Staging

Re: [VOTE] Release maven-jarsigner 1.1

+1 -- Olivier On Nov 9, 2013 7:12 PM, Tony Chemit che...@codelutin.com wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18134styleName=TextprojectId=11761 There are no more issues left in JIRA :) Staging repo:

Do releases _really_ need to be built with Java 1.5?

http://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-project-release-procedure.html says so. I don't know where I'm going to get that environment. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: Do releases _really_ need to be built with Java 1.5?

i guess it's the only way to definitely ensure backwards compatibility open potential solution would be to use vagrant, I use it to ensure developers as using the same base build setup and the files can be source controlled On 11 November 2013 22:39, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com

[VOTE] Release Apache Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.11

Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=19110styleName=TextprojectId=11127Create=Createatl_token=ACIO-CAVI-QX7G-9IAS%7C963c6bebb9ceae25b98c7c7add910785a302a0b4%7Clin (or see below) There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: Do releases _really_ need to be built with Java 1.5?

Isnt the question: is there still someone needing j5? Almost all apache projects and others moved to j6 at least Le 11 nov. 2013 23:53, John Patrick nhoj.patr...@gmail.com a écrit : i guess it's the only way to definitely ensure backwards compatibility open potential solution would be to use

Re: Do releases _really_ need to be built with Java 1.5?

I don't know where I'm going to get that environment. Everything is still accessible in Oracle Java Archive: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html Dawid - To unsubscribe, e-mail: