Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just added a .gitattributes file to the repo, which fixes the problem permanently. All our git repos now have that file. Come to think of it, maybe we should do another round of migrations ? Kristian 23. nov. 2013 07:23 skrev Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr følgende: uh! with svn,

Re: git commit: Adding envar MAVEN_CMD_LINE_ARGS to shell scripts to provide consistency for accessing CLI args via env.MAVEN_CMD_LINE_ARGS user property (from plugins, for example).

2013-11-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I don't understand the change there is no Jira issue associated and it breaks ITs both on Apache's Jenkins instance and on my local machine can you explain and check, please? Regards, Hervé Le lundi 21 octobre 2013 18:30:19 jdca...@apache.org a écrit : Updated Branches: refs/heads/master

shade plugin release

2013-11-23 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, I'd like to release shade plugin next week (only 1 new feature) Let me know if any issues. Cheers, -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy - To unsubscribe,

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Michael-O
Am 2013-11-23 07:23, schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: uh! with svn, we have svn-eol-style.txt [1] to deal automatically with such newline issues with git, nothing is written yet [2], but I suppose we need such an equivalent config since .apt files are not well known That one was quite annoying. Took

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Your local settings dont matter now that I added .gitattributes K

Re: git commit: MNG-5530 Introduced mojo execution guice component scope

2013-11-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
nice new feature a few remarks: - IMHO, such a feature deserve a 3.2 Maven version instead of 3.1.2 - explanations in the commit comment are a good start for a documentation page in the component, no? - for the TODOs in MojoExecutionListener interface, I think both methods should be added,

Re: git commit: MNG-5530 Introduced mojo execution guice component scope

2013-11-23 Thread Igor Fedorenko
On 11/23/2013, 10:57, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: nice new feature a few remarks: - IMHO, such a feature deserve a 3.2 Maven version instead of 3.1.2 I don't feel particularly strong about this. On one hand, this does not introduce any user-visible change in behaviour, so from user point of view

Re: git commit: Adding envar MAVEN_CMD_LINE_ARGS to shell scripts to provide consistency for accessing CLI args via env.MAVEN_CMD_LINE_ARGS user property (from plugins, for example).

2013-11-23 Thread Igor Fedorenko
I think the change assumes that /bin/sh is bash-compatible. On OSX 10.9 I have to change mvn script to explicitly require #!/bin/bash, otherwise maven invocation fails. -- Regards, Igor On 11/23/2013, 5:46, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: I don't understand the change there is no Jira issue associated

Re: git commit: Adding envar MAVEN_CMD_LINE_ARGS to shell scripts to provide consistency for accessing CLI args via env.MAVEN_CMD_LINE_ARGS user property (from plugins, for example).

2013-11-23 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
I think X=v export X Instead of export X=v is more portable. But in any cases, if this is supposed to be an official API it needs to be better tracked and documented (and I somewhat think those features make maven POMs less portable). Am 23.11.2013 um 17:47 schrieb Igor

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration with .gitattributes instructions, and made a global cleanup Seems like plugin-tools is ready for migration, or even did it without having the page updated Now, I did not have any feedback about SCM report problems with

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Michael-O
Am 2013-11-23 19:02, schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: I updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migration with .gitattributes instructions, and made a global cleanup Seems like plugin-tools is ready for migration, or even did it without having the page updated Now, I did not have

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Saturday, 23 November 2013, Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote: Am 2013-11-23 19:02, schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: I updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migrationwith .gitattributes instructions, and made a global cleanup Seems like plugin-tools is ready for migration,

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Michael-O
Am 2013-11-23 20:18, schrieb Stephen Connolly: On Saturday, 23 November 2013, Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote: Am 2013-11-23 19:02, schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: I updated https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Git+Migrationwith .gitattributes instructions, and made a global cleanup

Re: [1/2] Remove unintentional CRs

2013-11-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
On Saturday, 23 November 2013, Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote: Am 2013-11-23 20:18, schrieb Stephen Connolly: On Saturday, 23 November 2013, Michael-O 1983-01...@gmx.net wrote: Am 2013-11-23 19:02, schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY: I updated

Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
Before I forget, here are some of my thoughts on moving towards Model Version 5.0.0 The pom that we build with need not be the pom that gets deployed... thus the pom that is built with need not be the same format as the pom that gets deployed. Only with packagingpom/packaging do we

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-23 Thread Robert Scholte
A couple of months ago I started with a patch for Modello[1][2] which should make it quite easy to generate a single Reader and Writer with support for different versions, with respect to all the existing checks. This is one of the requirements which must be fixed before we can start

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-23 Thread Paul Benedict
I like the idea of deploying multiple POM files. It is very in line with deploying multiple hash codes. Another solution is to deploy one POM that contains both the 4 and 5 signature. You can do this using XSD namespaces. The namespace of the root element can be whatever POM version you want, and

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Nov 23, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Before I forget, here are some of my thoughts on moving towards Model Version 5.0.0 The pom that we build with need not be the pom that gets deployed... thus the pom that is built with need not be

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-23 Thread Igor Fedorenko
On 11/23/2013, 23:08, Jason van Zyl wrote: On Nov 23, 2013, at 5:44 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Before I forget, here are some of my thoughts on moving towards Model Version 5.0.0 The pom that we build with need not be the pom that gets deployed... thus the

Re: Model Version 5.0.0

2013-11-23 Thread Manfred Moser
By separating consumption and production metadata formats, we'll be able to evolve production format more aggressively. For example, it would be nice to have Tycho-specific configuration markup inside build section. This is not currently possible because all poms must be compatible with the

release maven-verifier

2013-11-23 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Hello, I'd like to release maven-verifier 1.5 and switch core ITs to the new version some time next week. This is to pick up generics changes and IDE integration hooks I just introduced. Any objections? -- Regards, Igor - To