Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
Igor, There has been no traffic on the private list. By my counting, Jason has the required number of binding votes, so it is up to him to close the vote. On Thursday, 20 February 2014, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote: Jason, Stephen, other PMC members, I can't really know if there

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
My bad. I think there are only two PMC votes cast (mine and Jason's) so he may need one more On Thursday, 20 February 2014, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Igor, There has been no traffic on the private list. By my counting, Jason has the required number of binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Arnaud Héritier
My +1 Tested on few projects and found no issue I just find strange the new INFO log at startup : [INFO] Using the builder org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.singlethreaded.SingleThreadedBuilder with a thread count of 1 Probably to put in verbose in the future ? cheers On Thu, Feb

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Tony Chemit
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 12:15:57 +0100 Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: +1 tested on nuiton.org, chorem.org and some codehaus. Works fine to me. thanks, tony. My +1 Tested on few projects and found no issue I just find strange the new INFO log at startup : [INFO] Using the

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 finally it's agile @apache :P On 20 February 2014 13:30, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote: Jason, Stephen, other PMC members, I can't really know if there is behind-the-scenes pmc-only discussion going on, but is there any chance to get 3.2.1 released this week? I need to do

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result: +1 (binding): Jason van Zyl, Stephen Connolly, Arnaud Hértier, Olivier Lamy +1 (non-binding): Manfred Moser, Igor Fedorenko, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Paul Benedict, Mark Derricutt, Baptiste Mathus, Mirko Friedenhagen I will writeup the release

Re: JIRA Access

2014-02-20 Thread Benson Margulies
Register for an xircles account on Codehaus and you will have JIRA access. Commit comes from sustained participation. On February 20, 2014 8:33:12 AM EST, Ashish Patel ashish.pate...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, What would it take for me to get JIRA access to create tickets and/or comment? I would

JIRA Access

2014-02-20 Thread Ashish Patel
Hi, What would it take for me to get JIRA access to create tickets and/or comment? I would like to add patch file to an existing ticket ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-327). I am hoping this would help it get completed sooner. Commit access would be great too. Let me know if this is

Re: JIRA Access

2014-02-20 Thread Tomasz Krakowiak
Here is a link https://xircles.codehaus.org/signup/ you can find it on https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Dashboard.jspa in introduction section. Wiadomość napisana przez Ashish Patel ashish.pate...@gmail.com w dniu 20 lut 2014, o godz. 14:33: Hi, What would it take for me to get JIRA

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven 3.2.1

2014-02-20 Thread Mark Derricutt
w00t ;-) Congrats on a fairly speedy release! Roll on this new Maven Lifecycle we have going on! Mark On 21 Feb 2014, at 3:54, Jason van Zyl wrote: I will writeup the release notes, get the site published and promote to Maven Central.

Re: JIRA Access

2014-02-20 Thread Barrie Treloar
On 21 February 2014 06:11, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: Register for an xircles account on Codehaus and you will have JIRA access. Commit comes from sustained participation. You can read some more at

Re: Towards faster releases

2014-02-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
Stephen, I think the recent process of releasing the core makes it clear that weekly official releases is not a viable concept. In the course of a week, 4 of the 25 PMC members voted and we haven't had a release in 6 months. Highly unlikely we'll get a better turnout more frequently. I don't

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Jason While I'm finally starting to see the potential with a DVCS like git, there are a couple of things that stands in the way of migrating, for example plugins, to git: 1. Judging by our resident git gurus, it will require quite some effort to prepare for and execute the actual migration.

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Paul Benedict
Would it be a good test to first try migrating individual plugin projects to GIT before attempting Maven Core? On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Jason While I'm finally starting to see the potential with a DVCS like git, there are a couple of

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Igor Fedorenko
Maven Core is in git and has been for quite some time now... or you mean some other Mave Core? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git -- Regards, Igor On 2/20/2014, 16:12, Paul Benedict wrote: Would it be a good test to first try migrating individual plugin projects to GIT before

Re: Towards faster releases

2014-02-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Here are my thoughts on the discussions. If we can get a tool chain working in Jenkins that build maven-core and runs the ITs in an automated and reliable way - that's great. The gold star in that should be the bare minimum required to do a release. I see it as a stamp of approval that the

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Feb 20, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jason While I'm finally starting to see the potential with a DVCS like git, there are a couple of things that stands in the way of migrating, for example plugins, to git: 1. Judging by our resident git

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Benson Margulies
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: On Feb 20, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jason While I'm finally starting to see the potential with a DVCS like git, there are a couple of things that stands in the way of migrating,

Re: What is in a version? (was Towards faster releases)

2014-02-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
I am in favor of using a stricter-than-today SEMVER-ish approach to our releases, not just in core but in all our releases. To me it's really easy. Just check the issue types in JIRA and let that decide which version number will come next. If there are only bugs fixed then it's a patch-release,

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Fred Cooke
The entire SCM interface is very SVN-centric IMO. I raised a number of git related m-rel-p issues some time ago, but have been busy moving countries and more in the mean time. I doubt there has been progress on them, though. One pretty much required a core change to Maven (perhaps something for

Re: Towards faster releases

2014-02-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
Well I guess we disagree as to how to get towards getting fixes to users faster. My personal belief is that it is better to set out the goal and find'n'fix the problems on the way to that goal rather than say there are too many problems for now that we can't get to that goal. I think weekly

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Dennis Lundberg
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@takari.io wrote: On Feb 20, 2014, at 1:07 PM, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jason While I'm finally starting to see the potential with a DVCS like git, there are a couple of things that stands in the way of

Re: Towards faster releases

2014-02-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 20 February 2014 21:22, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: Here are my thoughts on the discussions. If we can get a tool chain working in Jenkins that build maven-core and runs the ITs in an automated and reliable way - that's great. The gold star in that should be the bare

Re: What is in a version? (was Towards faster releases)

2014-02-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 20 February 2014 21:30, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.com wrote: I am in favor of using a stricter-than-today SEMVER-ish approach to our releases, not just in core but in all our releases. To me it's really easy. Just check the issue types in JIRA and let that decide which version

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Mark Derricutt
On 21 Feb 2014, at 10:27, Jason van Zyl wrote: I only release core and that works fine which begs the question: do we want to normalize our repository structure to simplify the tooling requirements. What exactly doesn't work? Trying to release a single thing out of a repository containing

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Mark Derricutt
That is easily worked around tho by adding a dependency setting for the newer -scm- modules. mark On 21 Feb 2014, at 10:29, Benson Margulies wrote: The M-R-P has a giant bug such that the current version of it and the current version of git do not work together. I think the bug is

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Stephen Connolly
Yep. I release projects every day with git and m-r-p. The only issues I know of are if you are wanting to release a portion of the repository or a reactor that does not start at the root of the repository... but I don't do that and I think it is a stupid thing to do anyway, so not a problem for me

Re: Convert everything to Git

2014-02-20 Thread Fred Cooke
+extension +groupIdorg.apache.maven.wagon/groupId +artifactIdwagon-ssh-external/artifactId +version${extension.version.wagon}/version +/extension It was SSH settings that were not being respected. Things like ports and ssh