Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread Arnaud Héritier
In short/middle term the lack of IDE integration isn't a real problem for now. Like Brian said, they know that users won't use such feature before several years. The runtime part providing the compatibility for the JRE should be backported to Java 8 but only Java 9 JDK will provide required tools

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread Gary Gregory
FWIW, I do not like 'minjava'. OTOH 'java7' is clear, not why not just stick to 'java#'? Gary On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Paul Benedict pbened...@apache.org wrote: This is the example project structure I had in mind: mvjar-example/ minjava/ src/main/java src/test/java

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread Paul Benedict
Gary, I made a point in my email to note these aren't special names. These are just example names to denote what kind of project material was inside. Cheers, Paul On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I do not like 'minjava'. OTOH 'java7' is clear,

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Arnaud, Arnaud Héritier wrote: In short/middle term the lack of IDE integration isn't a real problem for now. Like Brian said, they know that users won't use such feature before several years. The runtime part providing the compatibility for the JRE should be backported to Java 8 but

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Verifier Plugin version 1.1

2015-04-13 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 Regards, Hervé Le vendredi 10 avril 2015 20:07:25 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318120ve rsion=12331744 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JavaDoc Plugin version 2.10.3

2015-04-13 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On 10 April 2015 at 16:30, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? projectId=12317529version=12330876 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Maven Web Site

2015-04-13 Thread Marek Romanowski
Hi, I saw Karl's mail about Maven Web Site and I've decided to post some questions to you all. A few months ago I was thinking about how hard would it be to provide modern theme for maven generated sites. I wanted to have full project documentation within project, ideally generated with standard

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread Milos Kleint
afaik netbeans does support it (having different source/target level for test and main source) Not from the UI, but if you have your compiler plugin setup properly, it will take it into account. Milos On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread Paul Benedict
This is the example project structure I had in mind: mvjar-example/ minjava/ src/main/java src/test/java java7/ src/main/java src/test/java java8/ src/main/java src/test/java The minjava and java7 and java8 are not special names (just names to denote what

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven JavaDoc Plugin version 2.10.3

2015-04-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, here is my +1... one binding VOTE missing.. Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 4/10/15 8:30 AM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529version=12330876 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Verifier Plugin version 1.1

2015-04-13 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, here is my + 1 two more binding VOTE's missing... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 4/10/15 8:07 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 4 issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318120version=12331744 There are still a couple of issues left

Re: [DISCUSSION] JEP 238: Multi-Version JAR Files

2015-04-13 Thread nicolas de loof
I expect we could run the unit test suite on JDK 6 / 7 / 8 in parallel with 7/8 specific code being used for the JDK that do support them, so I wonder such a multi-module setup would work in this scenario, or would need yet another maven module for tests :'( 2015-04-12 23:33 GMT+02:00 Hervé

Re: release-plugin: push changes after perform for DCVS

2015-04-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Chris, it is _my personal_ experience, that running release:perform fails more often than the taging/comitting steps in release:prepare. - E.g. I run release:prepare and some plugins are only activated when performRelease is set (checkstyle, rat, gpg, license-checker). - You may argue that I just

Re: release-plugin: push changes after perform for DCVS

2015-04-13 Thread Chris Graham
Hello Mirko. I've been there too. With builds that take 4-6 hours to run, hundreds of modules, and lots of testing failures, some intermittent, some not. In my case, I had a very tempremental ESB/Process Server's serviceDeploy to contend with. I added a retry option into the was6:serviceDeploy

Re: Apache Maven JDeps Plugin

2015-04-13 Thread Alan Bateman
On 13/04/2015 03:46, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: last week, during DevoxxFR, Arnaud and I showed maven-jdeps-plugin: as expected, a lot of users didn't know about this tool So for sure, having this plugin and a report would help Then there is the question of: what should the report look like? Should

Re: release-plugin: push changes after perform for DCVS

2015-04-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
B On Monday, April 13, 2015, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Mirko. I've been there too. With builds that take 4-6 hours to run, hundreds of modules, and lots of testing failures, some intermittent, some not. In my case, I had a very tempremental ESB/Process Server's

Re: Apache Maven JDeps Plugin

2015-04-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
Or maybe just integrate http://www.graphdracula.net/showcase/ into the html report and let people drag the graph to their needs. Note that the site also lists similar projects providing similar functionality, so worth checking out either way On 13 April 2015 at 08:59, Alan Bateman