We first need to decide on the version this will get released as.
Updating everything to 3.4 now and to 4.0 two weeks later I can avoid
the duplicate effort this time.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
Am 12/17/16 um 05:17 schrieb Christian Schulte:
> Am 12/12/16 um 00:51 schrieb Igor Fedorenko:
>> I'm traveling until next weekend and won't be able to review your changes
>> properly until I'm back. I do want to stress that maven plugins are not
>> dependencies, they are resolved the same way
Am 12/12/16 um 00:51 schrieb Igor Fedorenko:
> I'm traveling until next weekend and won't be able to review your changes
> properly until I'm back. I do want to stress that maven plugins are not
> dependencies, they are resolved the same way as projects.
Master does it that way now. I may need
Hi,
I renamed the 'maven-aether-provider' module to
'maven-resolver-provider'. What happens on Jenkins is this: The
'maven-aether-provider' folder will not get deleted correctly when
Jenkins performs the SCM update/checkout. This may be due to the
existence of the 'maven-aether-provider/target'
Am 12/16/16 um 21:36 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> Am 2016-12-16 um 18:41 schrieb Christian Schulte:
>> Am 12/15/16 um 22:49 schrieb Michael Osipov:
>>> I would expect a VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_4 with VALIDATION_LEVEL_STRICT
>>> = VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_1. All spots which say Severity errOn31 =
>>>
Am 2016-12-16 um 18:41 schrieb Christian Schulte:
Am 12/15/16 um 22:49 schrieb Michael Osipov:
I would expect a VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_4 with VALIDATION_LEVEL_STRICT
= VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_1. All spots which say Severity errOn31 =
getSeverity( request,
Am 12/16/16 um 20:30 schrieb Robert Scholte:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:25:16 +0100, Christian Schulte
> wrote:
>
>> Am 12/16/16 um 15:21 schrieb Robert Scholte:
>>>
>>> but this cover the issue we are talking about, because IIUC you are
>>> saying
>>> that IF both junit and
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 17:25:16 +0100, Christian Schulte
wrote:
Am 12/16/16 um 15:21 schrieb Robert Scholte:
but this cover the issue we are talking about, because IIUC you are
saying
that IF both junit and hamcrest get the test-scope AND hamcrest would
have
a dependency
First commit is not relevant to the increase of the validation level,
BTW. Just the second one.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Am 12/15/16 um 22:49 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> I would expect a VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_4 with VALIDATION_LEVEL_STRICT
> = VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_1. All spots which say Severity errOn31 =
> getSeverity( request, ModelBuildingRequest.VALIDATION_LEVEL_MAVEN_3_1 );
> must be turned into
Am 12/16/16 um 17:25 schrieb Christian Schulte:
> Am 12/16/16 um 15:21 schrieb Robert Scholte:
>>
>> but this cover the issue we are talking about, because IIUC you are saying
>> that IF both junit and hamcrest get the test-scope AND hamcrest would have
>> a dependency THEN that dependency is
Am 12/16/16 um 15:21 schrieb Robert Scholte:
>
> but this cover the issue we are talking about, because IIUC you are saying
> that IF both junit and hamcrest get the test-scope AND hamcrest would have
> a dependency THEN that dependency is not added to the classpath. That is
> still
The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache
Maven Dependency Plugin, version 3.0.0
The dependency plugin provides the capability to manipulate artifacts. It
can copy and/or unpack artifacts from local or remote repositories to a
specified location.
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 23:39:50 +0100, Christian Schulte
wrote:
Am 12/15/16 um 23:28 schrieb Christian Schulte:
different thing. Think about the dependency management as a global
override of everything. That's how the resolver works. That's my
Maven does it that way since
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Anders Hammar, Hervé BOUTEMY, Olivier Lamy, Robert Scholte
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:20:56 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 25
+1
On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 23:20:56 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 25 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227=12330458=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
16 matches
Mail list logo