Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Am 02/14/17 um 20:25 schrieb Michael Osipov: > Who seconds MNG-6150 Javadoc improvements for 3.5.0 for FIX-3.5.0? > Functional changes, passes all tests. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

We are dumping the std/out because it seems the event "Z,0,BYE!" was missing. I need to confirm the stream. Maybe it will be okay now because I have applied a local patch and sent three Java files to Michael. If this does not help, we will dump received events. It's enough to test with single IT

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Am 2017-02-14 um 21:52 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: Hi Michael, On 14/02/17 21:47, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2017-02-14 um 21:23 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: Hi, so this looks like the problem is fixed..and maven-clean-plugin is not the culprit ... This isn't related. Surefire722 fails with

Re: Possible bug in Maven-core

Hi Peter, I've committed the fix based on your test. In fact with Maven3 things are much simpler. thanks, Robert On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:54:31 +0100, Petar Tahchiev wrote: Hi Robert, this: AFAIK we're never creating a new ProjectBuildingRequest, we should

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Hi Michael, On 14/02/17 21:47, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2017-02-14 um 21:23 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: Hi, so this looks like the problem is fixed..and maven-clean-plugin is not the culprit ... This isn't related. Surefire722 fails with 3.0.0, but works with MCLEAN 2.6.1. I can provide

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Am 2017-02-14 um 21:23 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise: Hi, so this looks like the problem is fixed..and maven-clean-plugin is not the culprit ... This isn't related. Surefire722 fails with 3.0.0, but works with MCLEAN 2.6.1. I can provide log files if you want. On 14/02/17 15:31, Michael

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Hi, so this looks like the problem is fixed..and maven-clean-plugin is not the culprit ... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 14/02/17 15:31, Michael Osipov wrote: This test passes flawlessly. Hi Michael, If you will run the build again, this test should not fail. At least I hope so,

Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Who seconds MNG-6150 Javadoc improvements for 3.5.0 for FIX-3.5.0? Functional changes, passes all tests. Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

Hi Tibor, I am currently running a full test bed with various Maven versions from Surefire master. I will pass you all log files along with the target directory. I'll join the channel at 18:30 Europe/Berlin. Michael > I will be on IRC in hour. > We can talk about the other two tests. > Can

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

I will be on IRC in hour. We can talk about the other two tests. Can you send me logs from yesterday for CheckTestNgReportTestIT and Surefire772NoSurefireReportsIT ? On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Michael Osipov-3 [via Maven] < ml-node+s40175n5898667...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > This test passes

Running a plugin integration test from an IDE?

Hello. I'm having a look at working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MASSEMBLY-848 but I've never worked on any of the "official" Maven plugins before. It seems like the most obvious way to start working on the bug is to introduce the files attached to that report as an integration test

Re: Re: I think we are ready for 3.5.0-alpha-1

This test passes flawlessly. > Hi Michael, > > If you will run the build again, this test should not fail. At least I hope > so, because it's ok on my side >

Re: Possible bug in Maven-core

Hi Robert, this: AFAIK we're never creating a new ProjectBuildingRequest, we should be using the original or a clone of it, so the suggestion to set both types of properties seems weird. is not true:

Re: Re: Build Maven offline

> Am 02/13/17 um 17:47 schrieb Guo Yunhe: > >> Don't. Don't do the same as done here: > >> https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/fedora/25/s390x/m/maven-3.3.9-6.fc25.noarch.html > >> > >> The completely disassembled your tarball and build Maven theirselves. This > >> is a non-canoncial build which

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #142: SUREFIRE-1330: Import provider code donated by JU...

Github user britter commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/142 awesome! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or