Re: [VOTE] Require Java 17 for Maven 4

+1 (non binding) On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:31 AM Benjamin Marwell wrote: > Hi Maven Devs/Users/Committers and PMC members! > > After several discussions on the mailing lists, I would like to > start a vote in favour of setting the minimal Java bytecode target > of Maven-Core 4 to 17 and hence

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

, Christian Stein a écrit : > > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 6:45 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > > > wrote: > > > > > Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 18:30, Stephane Nicoll > > > a > > > écrit : > > > > > > ... > > > > > OK. Why is our b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:55 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 17:23, Stephane Nicoll a > écrit : > > > On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:17 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > > > wrote: > > > > > Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 17:06, Stephane Nicoll >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 5:17 PM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 17:06, Stephane Nicoll a > écrit : > > > Thanks but that doesn't really answer my question. That version is picked > > up by dependency management of the project as far as I can tell. If a >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

on-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 16:35, Stephane Nicoll a > écrit : > > > An update. This may be the other fixed issue in that release actually > > (SUREFIRE-1764). Is JUnit engine 1.6.1 now mandatory? What happens for &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

An update. This may be the other fixed issue in that release actually (SUREFIRE-1764). Is JUnit engine 1.6.1 now mandatory? What happens for projects that are using an older JUnit version? On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 3:59 PM Stephane Nicoll wrote: > I am not sure that SUREFIRE-1679 is fixed. I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.3

I am not sure that SUREFIRE-1679 is fixed. I've ran the Spring Boot build with 2.22.2 and reproduced the error there. Upgrading to this candidate release and I got this error. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin:2.22.3:test (default-test) on project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 3.1.1

+1 (non-binding anymore). Cheers, S. On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 1:47 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Thank you Hervé > > I need two more binding +1 please > > Enrico > > Il Sab 8 Feb 2020, 21:43 Hervé BOUTEMY ha scritto: > > > +1 > > > > I was able to rebuild (with JDK 8) .jar, -sources.jar and > >

Re: [VOTE] JDK 8 Minimum Requirement for Maven 3.7.0

+1 On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:11 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi to all, > > based on the discusion this is the formal VOTE to lift the minimum of > Maven Core with version 3.7.0 to JDK 8 minimum. > > Vote open for at least 72 hours. > > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > > Kind regards > Karl

Re: flatten-maven-plugin maintenance status?

I second that though I've seen some activity today, including a fix that allows the Spring Boot project to upgrade to Maven 3.6[1]. Looking forward to a release of the plugin! Thanks, S. [1] https://github.com/mojohaus/flatten-maven-plugin/issues/89 On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 11:52 AM Falko Modler

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven OSGi

+1 On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 3:17 PM Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Maven project consist of about 90 (sub)projects. Due to the > small number of volunteers and the huge amount of code to maintain we're > missing enough space to make real progress on all these projects, > including

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.2

+1 Thanks a lot for your help Enrico! On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:04 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 1 issue: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12345433=Text=12317927=Create_token=A5KQ-2QAV-T4JA-FDED%7C568123541489d632001256d1b9872c5af17721f9%7Clout

Re: Surefire maintenance release

t; > but I have to do some burocratic steps in JIRA before sending the > official [VOTE] email > I have sent other emails on this mailing list in order to complete my task > > @Stephane Nicoll if you want to try out the artifacts you are welcome. > Anyway I will expect an offici

Re: Surefire maintenance release

; >>> > > > > unfortunately rework internal code in Surefire project which > >>> takes > >>> > > > really a > >>> > > > > lots of time and spends private energy, and thus 2.22.2 is less > >>> > > important >

Re: Read-only parameter can be set

ble, we'll > probably > need a grace period with warnings for people setting such read-only > parameters > before really breaking such abnormal builds > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 4 avril 2019, 13:22:17 CEST Stephane Nicoll a écrit : > > Hey, > > > >

Read-only parameter can be set

Hey, I have a weird case trying to deprecate a "finalName" property where said property can still be set by the user. Here is the definition: /** * Name of the generated archive. * @since 1.0 */ @Parameter(defaultValue = "${project.build.finalName}", readonly = true) private String

Re: Surefire maintenance release

as well and grow the team, i.e. > Andreas and Kristian. > > Cheers > Tibor > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:11 PM Stephane Nicoll > > wrote: > > > Thanks for having a look Tibor! > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 4:37 PM Tibor Digana > > wrote: &g

Re: Surefire maintenance release

ncept is that we define it once and we won't have > any reason to change this concept again in another version. > Makes sense? > > Cheers > Tibor > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 3:38 PM Stephane Nicoll > > wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > Can someone working

Re: Surefire maintenance release

Hey, Can someone working on surefire confirm the interest of creating that branch in the main repo and kick-off a release if a review is satisfactory? Thanks! S. On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 4:09 PM Stephane Nicoll wrote: > Hey, > > I've created a `2.22.x` branch based on the 2.22.1 tag

Re: Surefire maintenance release

5af4c256d919a9b2e7a > > [2]: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/commit/19006aa70f36705f399b8c105a16f636904f00f3 > > Cheers > Tibor > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:54 AM Stephane Nicoll > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > It's g

Re: Surefire maintenance release

pluginManagement. > > We did not break current users and so we split the entire work into > > multiple stages. The naming convention really is not a problem as you can > > see and Stephane confirmed it. > > So we made welcome compromises on our side in ASF and now your steps in

Re: Surefire maintenance release

roblem by the way as I've hopefully indicated above. Thanks, S. > > Cheers > Tibor > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:54 AM Stephane Nicoll > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > It's great to see the progress on Surefire 3.0 and I wanted to reach out &g

Surefire maintenance release

Hi everyone, It's great to see the progress on Surefire 3.0 and I wanted to reach out to discuss a practicable problem with the 2.x line. There are a number of fixes for JUnit 5 that are only available in the 3.x line that isn't GA yet. [1][2] Putting my Spring Boot hat for a min, this actually

Re: issue with junit 5 integration

ook > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 10:07, Stephane Nicoll > a > écrit : > > > How do I reproduce this problem concretely? Having to specify a > dependency > > in

Re: issue with junit 5 integration

How do I reproduce this problem concretely? Having to specify a dependency in surefire is not an option for us as we want the JUnit5 provider to be detected automatically. I've upgraded a Spring Boot project to use 5.3.0 and I don't see any problem. Thanks, S. On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:46 PM

Re: Welcome Sylwester Lachiewicz to the Apache Maven Team

Welcome Sylwester! On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 12:58 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi to all, > > On behalf of the Apache Maven PMC I am pleased to announce that > Sylwester Lachiewicz has been voted in as a new Apache Maven committer. > > Sylwester, welcome on board and have a lot of fun! > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.8.0

+1 Thanks, S. On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 at 19:28, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 18 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317225=12341563 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.7.1

Good point about the release number there though. I'd be +1 for 3.8.0 as well. On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:37 PM Robert Scholte wrote: > -1, changing the default for source/ target should not be fixed with a > patch number. Should be 3.8.0.Probably my fault that I didn't update the > version,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.7.1

+1 Thanks, S. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:18 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 18 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317225=12341563 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.4

+1 Thanks, S. On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 10:45 PM Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 16 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12342826=Text=12316922 > > There are 356 issues left in JIRA for Maven core: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer Plugin version 3.0.0-M2

+1 Thanks, S. On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:45 PM Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 28 issues (including those for M1): > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12343432=Text > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.22.0

+1 On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 3:31 AM Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 15 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12343247 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#issues/?jql=project+% >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.2.2

+1 On Sat, 9 Jun 2018 at 15:46, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > I need at least one more PMC Vote...someone there? > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > On 08/06/18 19:06, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need at least one more PMC Vote... > > > > Kind regards > > Karl

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven EAR Plugin version 3.0.0

+1 S. On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:47 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 41 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje > ctId=12317422=12330696 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

t; Hi all > > > > > > Sylwester Lachiewicz provided a fix for jansi 1.18-SNAPSHOT which > > resolves > > > my issue. I am not able to reproduce antrun issue > > > > > > > > > -Dan > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.20.1

+1 (also tested on JDK10) Thanks, S. On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Tibor Digana wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 33 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12317927=12341630 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.3

+1 Thanks, S. On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 24 February 2018 at 22:00, Stephen Connolly < > stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 22 issues: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 3.0.0

+1 Thanks, S. On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 8:20 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le jeudi 4 janvier 2018, 11:27:02 CET Robert Scholte a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > We solved 13 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.1

+1 S. On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 25 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > version=12338964=Text=12316922 > > There are 350 issues left in JIRA for Maven core: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Dependency Plugin version 3.0.2

+1 Thanks! On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 7 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje > ctId=12317227=12341254 > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Shade Plugin version 3.1.0

+1 On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 at 16:01, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 6 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12339197=Text > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Assembly Plugin version 3.1.0

+1 tested with various projects (including the regression that was affecting Spring Boot). Thanks! On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 10 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >

Re: Any plans for maven-assembly-plugin release?

+1 the spring boot project is waiting for a new release as well. On Fri, 11 Aug 2017 at 12:47, Mat Booth wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any plans for a maven-assembly-plugin release? > > At Eclipse project we are keen to use the xz tarball compression support > :-) > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer Plugin version 3.0.0-M1

+1 > On 27 July 2017 at 06:58, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We solved 14 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje > > ctId=12317520=12330768=Text > > > > There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Compiler 3.6.2

+1 Thanks Olivier! S. On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.6.2. > > We fixed 3 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12317225=12339154 > > Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.5.0

+1 S. On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 00:14, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 86 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12336084=Text > > In there are 324 issues left in JIRA for Maven core: > >

Re: FOSDEM 2017

I might come on Sunday. On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 at 14:20, Robert Scholte wrote: > Hi, > > > > Just like the last couple of years FOSDEM has been a great opportunity to > > meet several Maven developers. > > Some of the new features and improvements started here when the Maven

Re: [VOTE] Reset Maven Core, Integration Tests and Resolver repository master branches

+1 On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 at 17:39, Manfred Moser wrote: > +1 (committer) > > > > Stephen Connolly wrote on 2017-01-04 04:16: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We have collectively managed to mess up our ability to follow the > original > > > release plan for 3.4.0 which was

Re: Maven 3.4.0 Release

Isn't that postponing the discussion we're having here on those controversial changes? I'd rather give it an extra effort rather than pushing it back and loosing all the context once we have to tackle 3.5. On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com>

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

Awesome Christian, it's much better now. Thank you! On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it> wrote: > Am 09/14/16 um 13:50 schrieb Stephane Nicoll: > > Dependency 'org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-commons:jar' has > > conflicting depen

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it> wrote: > Am 09/14/16 um 08:42 schrieb Stephane Nicoll: > > First of all, I'd like the error message to change. I still don't know to > > this day what it means. Second, if Maven is able to find out that t

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

rning is an excellent move IMO. But just change the damn error message ;-) Cheers, S. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Stephane Nicoll > <stephane.nic...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 2:50 PM, jieryn <jie...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>

Re: New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

arrange the causing imports in the inheritance hierarchy to apply standard override logic based on artifact coordinates." Thanks! S. > > I don't think I've seen a more clear piece of evidence for Maven > pom.xml technical debt. :-) > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Step

New warnings with Maven 3.4-SNAP

Hi, This command creates a vanilla project using Spring Cloud that has a hierarchy of BOMs curl https://start.spring.io/starter.zip -d dependencies=cloud-config-client -o demo.zip extract and run and you'll get plenty of warnings[1] I am trying to make sense of this message: To resolve this

Re: Introducing myself

Welcome Benedikt! On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello maven community, > > I'm Benedikt Ritter, 30 years old from Neuss (Germany). I'm committer and > member of the project management committee of the Apache Commons project. I > just wanted to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven WAR Plugin version 3.0.0

Sorry to be a party pooper but is there any way we could include MWAR-262 still? Thanks, S. On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi, > > We solved 32 issues: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje > ctId=12318121=12331760 > >

Maven central stats

Hey, I am curious, are we involved in any way with the Maven central download statistics thing? I am asking because I think I've found a major problem[1] and I am happy to investigate. I just don't know where the code is. Cheers, S. [1] https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/MVNCENTRAL-1159

Re: [DISCUSS] Java version requirement for Mavan 3.4.x

I disagree. Changing system requirements in a minor release is kind of weird so I'd rather say that the current practice is problematic. I actually don't know the rationale to require Java8 in the codebase but if we do it please let's label that as a major release. S. On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:10

Re: [VOTE] Add Manfred Moser as committer

+1 S. On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Hi, I'd like to introduce Manfred Moser as committer for the Apache Maven project. He's working on Android Maven plugin for years, has great discussions both on users and dev MLs, has a great attitude.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven EAR Plugin version 2.10

I clearly overlooked this one, sorry. +1 On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, just one VOTE is missing ;-)... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise On 12/28/14 3:30 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: Hi, We solved 19 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Name our mascot: Shotgun vs The Maven Owl

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: As cute as Shutgun might seem, for some unspecified definition of cute, I am sick of hearing about any kind of gun... http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-school-shootings-sandy-hook-20141211-story.html

Re: [VOTE] Run-off for mascot's name

B E On Tue Dec 09 2014 at 11:52:59 AM Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: H, E, K On 9 December 2014 at 10:52, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: This is a run-off vote to select the top two options for our new mascot's name. The entries

Re: [VOTE] Change project logo and adopt owl as mascot

+1 On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: For anyone who has been living under a rock, here is the background Background = I think everyone can agree that the site needs a reorganisation and a rewrite. Users cannot find what they

Re: Welcome Karl Heinz Marbaise to the Maven PMC

Congrats Karl! On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Barrie Treloar baerr...@gmail.com wrote: I'm pleased to announce that the Maven PMC has voted to add Karl to the Maven PMC. Welcome, Karl.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven EAR Plugin version 2.9.1

+1 Thanks, S. On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: +1 * maven-ear-plugin-2.9.1-source-release.zip results in BUILD SUCCESS * [INFO] Rat check: Summary of files. Unapproved: 0 unknown: 0 generated: 0 approved: 330 licence. * SHA1 correct * Site is

Re: [VOTE] Retire Maven Reactor Plugin

+1 S. On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.dewrote: Hi, based on the decision we have made on the 18. february 2014 to define End Of Life of Maven 2 http://maven.apache.org/maven-2.x-eol.html I would suggest to retire the Maven Reactor Plugin. The last

Re: Welcome Mirko Friedenhagen to the Apache Maven Team

Welcome! S. On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.orgwrote: Hi, On behalf of the Apache Maven PMC I am pleased to announce that Mirko Friedenhagen (mfriedenhagen) has been voted in as a new Apache Maven committer. Mirko, welcome on board and have a lot of fun!

Re: maven-acr-plugin - plugins list page

Probably because not a lot of folks are using it. It's a mistake, go ahead and add it. Thanks, S. On Thursday, February 20, 2014, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@gmx.de wrote: Hi, so after taken a look into SVN it looks a little bit strange to me. The entry for the maven-acr-plugin has been

Re: [VOTE] Maven 2.x is end of life

+1 On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: We have not made a release of Maven 2.x since 2.2.1 which was August 2009. During that period no release manager has stepped up to cut a release. I would argue that we should just therefore just

exclude on scope import

Hi, Has anybody thought (or worked on) the ability to exclude dependencies from the import of a pom for a given project. Let's say that project S uses commons-logging and we use that project in our project. We have something like dependency groupId/groupId

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Ear Plugin version 2.9

+1, thanks! S. On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.orgwrote: Hi, We solved 11 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? projectId=11132version=18770styleName=Html There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: prepare maven-ear-plugin 2.9

Honestly, I don't really see the problem. Looking at the latest release[1], there are 4 required parameters indeed but the default value is defined (in bold). I don't think this is specific to the EAR plugin actually: the jar plugin has exactly the same kind of doc! [2] Maybe the required

Re: Welcome Bartholdi Dominik as a new committer

Welcome on board! On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, Please welcome Bartholdi Dominik as a new committer of the Apache Maven project. The Apache Maven PMC has voted to grant committership to him. The account have already been set up and he can

Re: Maven Core moving to 1.6

Yep, +1 for 3.2 and onward. S. On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Given the vote we had about releases after September does anyone mind if I update the source/target levels to 1.6 for the core? Thanks, Jason

Re: Maven 3.1.1

Hi, On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: I hope to release the next version in pretty short order, integrating Aether 0.9.0.M3 and fixing a few more bugs. So if you can't do the things you want by tomorrow I think we'll have another release in a couple weeks.

Re: Release Maven 3.1.1

On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.orgwrote: Hi, Personally I'm not a huge fan of the release-model as done by Jenkins, meaning releasing once or twice a week with only a few fixes. As a user I'm not going to update for every new release, it most have real

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven IDEA Plugin version 2.2.1

+1 On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Dennis Lundberg dennisl.apa...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, This is the final release of this plugin. After this release it will be retired, see separate vote thread for more info on that. We solved 1 issue:

Re: The next major release of Maven: 4.0.0

Same here. On Sunday, March 3, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote: As I see it, you are using the version number to communicate with the tiny number of people who have made plugins that depend on Aether. I would rather see us use the version number to communicate with the vast number of people

Re: [VOTE] formally end support for Maven 1

+1 S. On Saturday, March 2, 2013, Benson Margulies wrote: Based on the sentiment on the discussion thread, I call a formal vote to end support for Maven 1.x. This is a vote to: 1: Remove maven 1 release materials from the primary distribution area, leaving them only on the archive. 2:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

+1 S. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We fixed 1 issue: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=19088 Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-270/ Staging distribution:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13, Take 2

I was testing this on one of our projects that has good use of forkmode for all kinds of reasons and I have one test that is consistently stuck with this but it's stuck with 2.12.4 too so I am not going to -1 but I can't vote +1 either... I'll investigate a bit more and report the issue later.

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

I would go for 2.2. Releasing something and then include it as the default version the same day seems a bit too much for me. On Thursday, November 29, 2012, Jason van Zyl wrote: I'm going to re-spin it. Shall I just use 2.2 or wait for you guys to spin 2.4? On Nov 28, 2012, at 12:54 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

+1 S. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Compiler 3.0 We fixed 9 issues. http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=18537styleName=TextprojectId=11130Create=Create Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Sources plugin 2.2.1

+1 On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Sources Plugin 2.2.1. We fix 1 blocking issue which prevent some users to upgrade: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSOURCES-62 Staging repository:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven WAR Plugin version 2.3

+1 Thanks, S. On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11150styleName=Htmlversion=18298 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Move Maven projects sources to git

+0 S. On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, This vote is to decide moving our source tree currently located in one svn repository to git (multiple git repositories). First, we need to have at least 3 volunteers to help on Apache infra for this move and

[ANN] Maven EAR Plugin 2.8 Released

The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven EAR Plugin, version 2.8 The plugin generates a JavaEE Enterprise Archive (EAR) file. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-ear-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin configuration: plugin

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven EAR Plugin version 2.8

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Hervé Boutemy, Mark Struberg, Olivier Lamy and Stéphane Nicoll +1 (non binding): Tony Chemit I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Best, S. - To

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven EAR Plugin version 2.8

Before I forget, my +1 S. On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11132styleName=Htmlversion=18269 There are still around 15 issues left in JIRA: http

[VOTE] Release Maven EAR Plugin version 2.8

Hi, We solved 7 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11132styleName=Htmlversion=18269 There are still around 15 issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11132status=1 Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version 2.5.1

+1 S. On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11142version=18715styleName=Html There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Dependency Plugin 2.5.1

+1 S. On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Dependency Plugin 2.5.1. This release contains a regression issue fix and a perf improvement (https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEP/fixforversion/18718) Staging repository:

[ANN] Maven Resources Plugin 2.6 Released

The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Resources Plugin, version 2.6 The Resources Plugin handles the copying of project resources to the output directory. http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-resources-plugin/ You should specify the version in your project's plugin

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Resources Plugin version 2.6 Take 2

Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Stephen Connolly, Robert Scholte, Hervé Boutemy, Olivier Lamy and Stéphane Nicoll +1 (non binding): Tony Chemit I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Best, S.

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Resources Plugin version 2.6 Take 2

/maven.apache.org/scm/maven-scm-plugin Regards, Hervé [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-resources-plugin-2.6/maven- resources-plugin/plugin-management.html Le mercredi 15 août 2012 12:45:31 Stephane Nicoll a écrit : Hi, We solved 9 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure

[ANN] Maven Filtering 1.1 Released

The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Filtering, version 1.1 These Plexus components have been built from the filtering process/code in Maven Resources Plugin. The goal is to provide a shared component for all plugins that needs to filter resources.

[ANN] Maven Script Interpreter 1.1 Released

The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Script Interpreter, version 1.1 This component provides some utilities to interpret/execute some scripts for various implementations: groovy or beanshell. http://maven.apache.org/shared/maven-script-interpreter/ You should specify

[ANN] Maven Invoker Plugin 1.7 Released

The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Invoker Plugin, version 1.7 The Invoker Plugin is used to run a set of Maven projects. The plugin can determine whether each project execution is successful, and optionally can verify the output generated from a given project

[VOTE] Release Maven Resources Plugin version 2.6

Hi, We solved 9 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11145styleName=Htmlversion=17177 There are still around 30 issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11145status=1 Staging repo:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >