Re: Possible improvements on Maven

1) I use “import” scope to define BOMs. 2) (I’m not a maintainer) I believe your pull request to enhance document would be welcomed and will be a good start point for the discussion. Regards, Tomo On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 02:11 #ZHAO LIDA# wrote: > Dear Maven maintainers, > > > we are studying

Re: Doubt in `-DarchetypeVersion` in `mvn archetype:generate` command

If I were you, I would just use copy command to generate (copy) pom.xml after preparing your desired pom.xml. The maven-archetype-archetype just increases complexity in your case and it seems outdated. Regards, Tomo On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 02:33 divine chelladurai wrote: > Hi Team, > > i need

Re: AbstractMethodError at org.apache.maven.plugins.site.render.ReportDocumentRenderer.renderDocument

My Maven (3.6.3 + Java 11) also hit the same error from the command, but gave a better explanation: [INFO] Generating "JDepend" report --- jdepend-maven-plugin:2.0:generate-no-fork [WARNING] An issue has occurred with jdepend-maven-plugin:2.0:generate-no-fork report, skipping LinkageError

Re: --no-transfer-progress might be causing the some tests to fail

I'm not sure what the exact problem is in your environment when using "--no-transfer-progress". You may want to share more details (stacktrace and error messages). I might have a similar problem as yours. In my case, there was.a problem in GitHub Actions where it disconnects HTTP connections when

Re: [MDEP-644] Tests failing due to Guice Plexus incompatability

and it crosses projects. The line that causes the issue is in > maven-artifact-transfer DefaultArtifactResolver line 140, RepositorySystem > repositorySystem = > (RepositorySystem)this.container.lookup(RepositorySystem.class); > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:47 PM Tomo Suzuki > wrote: >

Re: [MDEP-644] Tests failing due to Guice Plexus incompatability

Hi Ian, (I don’t have answer to your question) Do you have build failure log (including stacktrace) somewhere? Would you share URL of your branch? On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 18:21 Ian Lavallee wrote: > Hi, > > I am working on ticket MDEP-644 Reintroduce the verbose option for > dependency:tree.

Re: Maven intern projects

My wishlist: Maven Central web (https://search.maven.org/) to show the health of artifacts. For example, the health includes how much their dependencies are up-to-date, presence of license element in pom.xml, and so on. I recently found pub.dev (Dart/Flutter repo system) has such tab for every

Re: [maven-resolver] DefaultDependencyCollector not collecting direct provided dependencies

/java/suztomo/TestProjectDependencyResolver.java#L136 [2]: https://github.com/suztomo/maven-provided-scope#comparison-between-defaultdependencycollector-and-projectdependencyresolver On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:05 PM Tomo Suzuki wrote: > > I created a test case to demonstrate this behavior: &

Re: [maven-resolver] DefaultDependencyCollector not collecting direct provided dependencies

I created a test case to demonstrate this behavior: https://github.com/suztomo/maven-provided-scope/blob/master/src/test/java/suztomo/AppTest.java#L72 On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:36 PM Tomo Suzuki wrote: > > Hi Maven developers, > > I find DefaultDependencyCollector is not get

[maven-resolver] DefaultDependencyCollector not collecting direct provided dependencies

Hi Maven developers, I find DefaultDependencyCollector is not getting "direct" and "provided" dependencies by default. Is this expected behavior? Background: We use maven-resolver in our Java code. We create RepositorySystemSesison through MavenRepositorySystemUtils.newSession [1]. We use the

Re: [maven-dependency-tree] Repository to Contribute?

The pull request has been merged. Thanks, Robert. On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 1:50 PM Tomo Suzuki wrote: > > Hi Maven developers, > > I raised a PR: [MSHARED-850] Upgrade org.eclipse.aether:aether-util dependency > for maven-dependency-tree [1]. > However, this GitHub reposi

[maven-dependency-tree] Repository to Contribute?

Hi Maven developers, I raised a PR: [MSHARED-850] Upgrade org.eclipse.aether:aether-util dependency for maven-dependency-tree [1]. However, this GitHub repository is not listed in "Apache Maven Dependency Tree / Source Code Management" [2]. It only list a SVN repository. Can somebody guide me

Re: Unknown lifecycle phase " ".

(I feel us...@maven.apache.org is suitable place) What's command to get the error? What does "mvn -version" say? On Tue, Jan 7, 2020 at 12:15 PM sireindera...@gmail.com wrote: > > Team, > > I am facing the below issue. I am attaching the pom file here for your > reference…. > > I am facing the

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

Cool. Thanks.

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

Hi Mark, Thank you for response. > resolve highest org.jetbrains:annotations:[16.0.3,17.0.0) via public; For reproducible builds, I expected the lock file contains specific versions, rather than ranges. Would you share the background why your tool records the ranges? -- Regards, Tomo

Re: Reproducible Builds for Maven

Sounds nice! > The precise result depends only on 2 key facts When I hear “reproducible builds”, I think of lock files that remember library versions used. Gradle’s approach: https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/dependency_locking.html Does your approach use such file to record library

[maven-resolver] PR#39 PathRecordingDependencyVisitor to handle 3 cycles

Hi @bentmann , Tibor17 suggested your review on this PR https://github.com/apache/maven-resolver/pull/39 of mine. I appreciate if you can take a look at it. -- Regards, Tomo

Re: Asking for release: Eclipse 2019-06 incompatible with Tycho because of Maven 3.6.1 bug

Tibor, Thank you for following up. I'm the author of PR#39 . I believe the bug MRESOLVER-93 has been in maven-resolver for a while. Added comment in the PR summary. On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 7:58

Re: [maven-core] Feedback wanted: MNG-6732 DefaultArtifactDescriptorReader.loadPom to check IGNORE_MISSING policy upon ArtifactTransferException

Hi Enrico, Thank you. I responded to your comment; I don't think of a newly introduced unpredictable behavior. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 1:10 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Tomo, > I left a comment on github > > Cheers > Enrico > > Il gio 15 ago 2019, 18:05 Tomo Suzuki ha >

[maven-core] Feedback wanted: MNG-6732 DefaultArtifactDescriptorReader.loadPom to check IGNORE_MISSING policy upon ArtifactTransferException

Hi Maven developers, I appreciate if somebody can give feedback on my raised issue and pull request. [MNG-6732] - DefaultArtifactDescriptorReader.loadPom to check IGNORE_MISSING policy upon ArtifactTransferException https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6732

Re: Push install plugin docs

This broken link, I think. [image: image.png] Regards, Tomo On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 10:23 AM Anders Hammar wrote: > Works for me (Sweden/Europe). > > /Anders > > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 4:15 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold > wrote: > > > Could someone push the docs for > >

[maven-enforcer] How to get deeper dependency tree

Hi Maven enforcer rule developers, Our custom Maven Enforcer rule uses ProjectDependenciesResolver to get dependency tree. Naturally the dependency tree does not include provided or optional dependency of transitive dependencies. (I understand this is expected behavior.) Is there a way to get a

Re: Maven-enforcer-plugin's use of aether-util in transitive dependency

9 alle ore 22:08 Tomo Suzuki > ha scritto: > > > Hi Enrico, > > > > The PR https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/pull/52 has been > approved > > (Thanks!) but not merged yet. > > Is this something you can take care of, or should I take any action? > >

Re: Maven-enforcer-plugin's use of aether-util in transitive dependency

Hi Enrico, The PR https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/pull/52 has been approved (Thanks!) but not merged yet. Is this something you can take care of, or should I take any action? Regards, Tomo *From: *Tomo Suzuki *Date: *Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 AM *To: *Maven Developers List Enrico

Re: Maven-enforcer-plugin's use of aether-util in transitive dependency

Enrico, Created the PR. https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/pull/52 Regards, Tomo On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 5:17 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > Awesome > Let's see the PR > > Thanks > Enrico > > Il mer 13 mar 2019, 22:19 Tomo Suzuki ha > scritto: > > > Hi

Maven-enforcer-plugin's use of aether-util in transitive dependency

Hi Maven developers, (following "Contributing" section of maven-enforcer-plugin ) I'm thinking to raise a PR to fix an issue below, so that maven-enforcer-plugin can work with maven-resolver-util without explicit "exclusion" element. Let me