Hello,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 (binding): John Casey, Emmanuel Venisse, Benson Margulies, Hervé
Boutemy, Wayne Fay, Kristian Rosenvold, Olivier Lamy
+1 (non-binding): Mirko Friedenhagen, Tony Chemit, Mark Derricutt,
Anders Hammar, Robert Scholte, Karl Heinz Marbaise
So
+1
Kristian
Den 17.01.2012 11:14, skrev Olivier Lamy:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The release notes is available here:
http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.0.4/release-notes.html
The staging repo:
hi,
+1 non-binding from me...
Tested with different of my projects no problems at all...
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
-
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
http://www.soebes.de
http://www.skmwiki.de
http://supose.org/wiki/supose
--
View this message in context:
+1
-Robert
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:32:54 +0100, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
wrote:
+1 non-binding
Tested Snapshot deploy to Codehaus Nexus. Tested that site now works
out-of-the-box (MNG-5221, MNG-5225). Also verified using new Maven
version properties in jar manifest (MNG-4112).
+1 binding
Tested on a few work and personal projects with no regressions noted.
Not doing anything particularly complicated in those builds.
Wayne
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:14 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The release notes is available here:
http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.0.4/release-notes.html
The staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-081/
For convenience builds
+1 non-binding, I ran a few jenkins jobs without problem (Linux) and
some local jobs on Mac OS X Lion.
Regards Mirko
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:14, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The
+1
On 1/17/12 5:14 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The release notes is available here:
http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.0.4/release-notes.html
The staging repo:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:14:02 +0100
Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (non-binding) Tested on all projects as simple build + via jenkins.
No regression detected.
Nice work guys ;)
Tony.
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The release notes is available here:
http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.0.4/release-notes.html
The staging
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Emmanuel
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The
+1
Core ITs published as run with this release
http://maven.apache.org/core-its/core-it-suite/
Hervé
Le mardi 17 janvier 2012 11:14:02 Olivier Lamy a écrit :
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The release notes is
+1 Non binding.
--
Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things — Steven Wilson,
Porcupine Tree
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote
for Apache Maven 3.0.4.
The
+1 non-binding
Tested Snapshot deploy to Codehaus Nexus. Tested that site now works
out-of-the-box (MNG-5221, MNG-5225). Also verified using new Maven
version properties in jar manifest (MNG-4112).
/Anders
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 01:56, Mark Derricutt m...@talios.com wrote:
+1 Non binding.
--
Hello everybody,
I understand the need to distinguish between these attempts. I now
have a local copy of 3.0.4 on my disc (as well as on some others).
Next month forgetful as I am, I will not know anymore which of the
different 3.0.4 copies was the blessed one. Let alone that the tag in
Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc
version numbers are cheap...
if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not
released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there are no binaries or source
distributions because it failed for some reason.
On 5 December
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc
version numbers are cheap...
if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not
released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there
This approach fails to make the release candidate available to a wider
community. We need to make release candidate builds available for
download and from maven central repository so early adopters can try
them easily. But we also need to have release candidates clearly marked
as such so more
But we have never made the RCs available from Maven Central.
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.maven%22%20AND%20a%3A%22maven-core%22
Show me an RC version in that list!
On 5 December 2011 14:30, Igor Fedorenko i...@ifedorenko.com wrote:
This approach fails to make
2011/12/5 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
Personally, I'd rather burn 3.0.4 and have 3.0.5, 3.0.6, etc
version numbers are cheap...
if anyone asks what happend to 3.0.4, we just say, oh that was not
released, there's a tag of it in svn, but there are no binaries or source
Well I would say, given the confusion over RCs or not RCs that when you
spin the official build, just build it as 3.0.5 so that there is no
official 3.0.4 and anyone who had one of the first two RCs can be clear
that it was an RC
On 5 December 2011 14:33, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Fair enough. I confused RC with alpha/beta versions we had in the past.
I can't recall if RCs were available from download page, though.
--
Regards,
Igor
On 11-12-05 9:33 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
But we have never made the RCs available from Maven Central.
Totally agreed, my point was uniqueness and reproducabilty, so 3.0.5 etc.
would be perfect IMO.
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my phone
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com
http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Dec 5, 2011 3:18 PM, Stephen Connolly
Thanks to you for the test sample.
I will cancel the vote and investigate more on monday (as not sure to
have enough time on this sunday)
My first impression is a side effect of this fix:
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/AETHER-91.
But need more investigation.
--
Olivier
2011/12/4 Dan Tran
Hello,
The vote is cancelled due to the issue found by Dan.
I will restart a vote when a fix will be available.
2011/12/1 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
The vote is cancelled due to the issue found by Dan.
I will restart a vote when a fix will be available.
An RC candidate I hope...
2011/12/1 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
The vote is cancelled due to the issue found by Dan.
I will restart a vote when a fix will be available.
An RC candidate I hope...
Do you work
2011/12/4 Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu:
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 3:37 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
The vote is cancelled due to the issue found by Dan.
I will restart a vote when a fix will be available.
An RC candidate I hope...
That will be a surprise :-)
I was off today
Again I start a release process and produce a candidate for release
build with a naming 3.0.4 for 5 days vote.
Something failed, so it has been fixed and I restarted a vote with a
second candidate for release called 3.0.4 for 5 days vote.
(retagging etc )
What is the difference with
2011/12/3 Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com:
When using 3.0.4 with appassemble-maven-plugin to generate java
wrapper scripts which use snapshot dependency. The plugin places the
dependencies to its lib/repo directory using timestamp snapshots
picked up from maven repo, but generated scripts using
The RCs were started for a very specific reason, to improve the
quality of our releases. Just breezing through this thread, there are
clearly issues with memory and some other stuff here that may be
bigger than we understand in this small testing surface. An RC build
will get more eyes and either
Please change subject as it's not related to the vote thread.
2011/12/3 Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu:
The RCs were started for a very specific reason, to improve the
quality of our releases. Just breezing through this thread, there are
clearly issues with memory and some other stuff here that
here is sample pom.xml to reproduce the issue. 3.0.3 generate the
correct lib dir, and script, but not 3.0.4
project xmlns=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0;
xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xsi:schemaLocation=http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
Thanks!
It looks an erroneous file is picked when it has been download from a
remote repo and when it's reinstall locally (use case of appassembler
which reinstall file locally)
investigating...
2011/12/3 Dan Tran dant...@gmail.com:
here is sample pom.xml to reproduce the issue. 3.0.3 generate
Thanks for looking into this issue. consider it is a blocking
regression since there is no work around for me to use 3.0.4
\-D
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks!
It looks an erroneous file is picked when it has been download from a
remote repo and
+1
runs fine here, artifacts look good.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2011 10:20 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2)
Hello,
I'd like
+1
Kristian
Den 01.12.2011 13:16, skrev Arnaud Héritier:
+1
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Anders Hammarand...@hammar.net wrote:
+1
Checksums are now created correctly when deploying a snapshot to
Codehaus's Nexus instance.
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:08,
+1 (non binding).
Baptiste
2011/12/2 Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com
+1
Kristian
Den 01.12.2011 13:16, skrev Arnaud Héritier:
+1
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Anders Hammarand...@hammar.net wrote:
+1
Checksums are now created correctly when deploying a
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:20:55 +0100
Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
+1 since was ok to me (without the deploy bug)
thanks,
Tony (non-binding)
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
+1
Been using it all day for a variety of things and haven't run into any issues.
Dan
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 10:20:55 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
I've done several medium sized builds and everything looks okay here.
+1
On 12/1/11 4:20 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=17215
Note
When using 3.0.4 with appassemble-maven-plugin to generate java
wrapper scripts which use snapshot dependency. The plugin places the
dependencies to its lib/repo directory using timestamp snapshots
picked up from maven repo, but generated scripts using '-SNAPSHOT' for
its classpath.
this breaks
+1
Emmanuel
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=17215
Note the difference with first
+1 (non-binding) used it on a couple of builds without problems.
Regards Mirko
--
Sent from my phone
http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com
http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
On Dec 3, 2011 2:33 AM, Emmanuel Venisse emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=17215
Note the difference with first vote is an upgrade of aether to 1.13.1
(to prevent chuncked transfer encoding when
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Maven-3-0-4-take-2-tp5038109p5038345.html
Sent from the Maven Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
Checksums are now created correctly when deploying a snapshot to
Codehaus's Nexus instance.
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:08, kreyssel d...@kreyssel.org wrote:
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Maven-3-0-4-take-2-tp5038109p5038345.html
+1
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote:
+1
Checksums are now created correctly when deploying a snapshot to
Codehaus's Nexus instance.
/Anders
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:08, kreyssel d...@kreyssel.org wrote:
+1
--
View this message in context:
Does no one else think it reasonable to do RCs like we have been doing for the
last 2 years?
On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
[...]
Note the difference with first vote is an upgrade of aether to 1.13.1
What about the memory issue that Jörg brought up? Shouldn't we at least
understand the cause and potential impact on other users before
continuing
sure why not for next one.
2011/12/1 Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io:
Does no one else think it reasonable to do RCs like we have been doing for
the last 2 years?
On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
[...]
Note the difference with first vote is an upgrade of aether to 1.13.1
What about the memory issue that Jörg brought up? Shouldn't we at least
understand the cause and potential impact on
yes we should have done it...
Lesson to learn for next releases ...
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote:
Does no one else think it reasonable to do RCs like we have been doing for
the last 2 years?
On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
2011/12/1 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com:
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
[...]
Note the difference with first vote is an upgrade of aether to 1.13.1
What about the memory issue that Jörg brought up? Shouldn't we at
Hi,
Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Oliver,
Olivier Lamy wrote:
@Jörg any open source projects you can share ?
Sorry, no, but I am try some runs now on a dedicated build server ... a
run takes some time though
It took a while, because I was hit by a real M3 regression first: MNG-5207
It's been so long I guess people have forgotten RCs used to be made.
The release of Apache Maven itself is sufficiently different to just a
plugin that a more formal release does make sense, but on the flip side
after all the arguments trying to get this out I guess people just want it
out there
+1 non-binding.
--
Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things — Steven Wilson,
Porcupine Tree
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
On 12/1/11 10:27 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/12/1 Jörg Schaiblejoerg.schai...@scalaris.com:
Benjamin Bentmann wrote:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2).
[...]
Note the difference with first vote is an upgrade of aether to 1.13.1
What about the memory
It seems to me that one of the major values of an 'RC' discipline is
that it's uniquely tagged and bagged we can tell which bugs where
found or fixed in which RC.
This in turn could argue for a scheme in which we vote and release
'milestone' releases: available for general testing, protected by
On 12/1/11 3:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
It seems to me that one of the major values of an 'RC' discipline is
that it's uniquely tagged and bagged we can tell which bugs where
found or fixed in which RC.
This in turn could argue for a scheme in which we vote and release
'milestone' releases:
Please change subject thread for such discussion !
Again, I don't have issue with this RC mode and I will take care next time.
--
Olivier go back to hack
2011/12/1 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com:
It seems to me that one of the major values of an 'RC' discipline is
that it's uniquely
On 12/1/11 3:28 PM, John Casey wrote:
On 12/1/11 3:25 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
It seems to me that one of the major values of an 'RC' discipline is
that it's uniquely tagged and bagged we can tell which bugs where
found or fixed in which RC.
This in turn could argue for a scheme in which we
Hello,
2011/11/30 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
Note that it wasn't really called until r1179571, so I think maybe the
http-shared module should go back to not supporting it. I suppose that was
added for Aether, which in turn is no longer needed :)
While looking at that I noticed this
Hi,
Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4.
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=17215
The staged repo is available here:
Now you mention it I have - but I've often seen some of our builds randomly
blow out of memory during some of our tests so I can't confirm its M304 at
fault or not.
( mind you - I was running Jason's Sonatype M304 dist before that so its
possible its there among a number of the newer builds...
Did you verify that you're using all the same plugins/versions ?
You might consider running something like jvisualvm attached to both
3.0.3 and 3.0.4 to see if your 3.0.3 build is just millimeters away
from failing on permgen already ;)
Kristian
Den 30.11.2011 09:41, skrev Jörg Schaible:
@Jörg any open source projects you can share ?
What kind of builds are you doing ? install deploy ? with an empty
repo or an already populated one ? is there any reporting done (site
plugin use) ? etc...
Any stack trace you could provide ?
Perso, I have tested this build with asf projects with
Hi Oliver,
Olivier Lamy wrote:
@Jörg any open source projects you can share ?
Sorry, no, but I am try some runs now on a dedicated build server ... a run
takes some time though
What kind of builds are you doing ? install deploy ?
mvn clean install
with an empty
repo or an already
Just did a release of maven scm and md5/sha1 are there :
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-265/org/apache/maven/scm/maven-scm-api/1.6/
My env:
mbp-olamy:scm olamy$ which mvn
/Users/olamy/softs/maven/apache-maven-3.0.4/bin/mvn
mbp-olamy:scm olamy$ env | grep MAVEN_OPTS
Just tried a deploy @ mojo and having the same issue
I'll try for a minimal pom on local file system, see how that goes
On 29 November 2011 08:44, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Just did a release of maven scm and md5/sha1 are there :
OK, just tried a simple deploy using a file: based wagon with the staged
artifacts...
[stephenc@stephenc ~]$ md5 ~/Downloads/apache-maven-3.0.4-bin.tar.gz
MD5 (/Users/stephenc/Downloads/apache-maven-3.0.4-bin.tar.gz) =
c1e67c7f32929b428266c88f7f62bee4
[stephenc@stephenc ~]$ tar -xzvf
: Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
Just tried a deploy @ mojo and having the same issue
I'll try for a minimal pom on local file system, see how
and LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
Just tried a deploy @ mojo and having the same
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
Just tried a deploy @ mojo and having the same issue
I'll try for a minimal pom on local file system, see how that goes
On 29 November 2011 08:44, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Just
: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:21 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
Just tried a deploy @ mojo and having the same issue
I'll try for a minimal pom on local file system, see how that goes
On 29 November 2011 08:44, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Just did a release
@Stephen the issue was with wagon-http 2.0
see http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/WAGON-353
I will add a core it test which check deploy of sha1 and md5.
2011/11/29 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com:
OK, just tried a simple deploy using a file: based wagon with the staged
Even with a clean local repo, .md5's are still not being deployed for me...
If this is an issue with the embedded WAGON (and it is looking like it
could be) then I have to change my vote back negative
-0.9 (binding)
[DEBUG] Using connector WagonRepositoryConnector with priority 0 for
That stacktrace was with
extensions
extension
groupIdorg.apache.maven.wagon/groupId
artifactIdwagon-http/artifactId
version2.1/version
/extension
/extensions
in the pom...
if I try
extensions
extension
I see the same checksum issue when trying to deploy a snapshot over at
Codehaus mojo:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/codehaus/mojo/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/2.3-SNAPSHOT/
I'm changing my vote to -1 (non-binding). IMHO we do not want end user
issues due to
cause this error.
Means we have to check where the difference is.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see
Olivier Lamy wrote:
I will add a core it test which check deploy of sha1 and md5.
You might want to check
MavenITmng4235HttpAuthDeploymentChecksumsTest
before.
Benjamin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same checksum issue when trying to deploy a snapshot over at
Codehaus mojo:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/codehaus/mojo/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/2.3
2011/11/29 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Olivier Lamy wrote:
I will add a core it test which check deploy of sha1 and md5.
You might want to check
MavenITmng4235HttpAuthDeploymentChecksumsTest
before.
Thanks.
And btw this it pass well :-)
Benjamin
So due to issues when releasing project and missing md5/sha1 on some
env whereas not on other.
The vote is cancelled for more investigations.
2011/11/25 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4.
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
this
error. Means we have to check where the difference is.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same
and a few cases which cause this
error. Means we have to check where the difference is.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache
, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same checksum issue when trying to deploy a snapshot over at
Codehaus mojo:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/codehaus/mojo/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/2.3-SNAPSHOT/
I'm changing my vote to -1 (non
: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same checksum issue when trying to deploy a snapshot over at
Codehaus mojo:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/codehaus/mojo/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/2.3-SNAPSHOT/
I'm changing my vote to -1 (non-binding). IMHO we do
, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same checksum issue when trying to deploy a snapshot over at
Codehaus mojo:
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/codehaus/mojo/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/2.3-SNAPSHOT/
I'm changing my vote
have to check where the difference is.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same checksum issue when
the difference is.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net
To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4
I see the same checksum issue when trying
Tamás Cservenák wrote:
Out of curiosity, why is chunked transfer encoding used to transfer
the few byte long SHA1 string?
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/AETHER-128
many servers does not support it
completely...
Which suggests to deprecate the problematic method in the StreamingWagon
2011/11/29 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Tamás Cservenák wrote:
Out of curiosity, why is chunked transfer encoding used to transfer
the few byte long SHA1 string?
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/AETHER-128
many servers does not support it
completely...
Which
I think doing RCs like we have done in the past for all other 3.x releases
might be a good idea.
On Nov 29, 2011, at 4:00 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
So due to issues when releasing project and missing md5/sha1 on some
env whereas not on other.
The vote is cancelled for more investigations.
Note that it wasn't really called until r1179571, so I think maybe the
http-shared module should go back to not supporting it. I suppose that was
added for Aether, which in turn is no longer needed :)
While looking at that I noticed this code is probably being called for anything
using the new
+1 (non-binding)
/Anders
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:01, Emmanuel Venisse
emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Emmanuel
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4.
We fixed 31 issues.
See release
Excerpts from Arnaud Héritier's message of Sat Nov 26 00:37:09 +0100 2011:
...
it might be really useful to add a link to release notes of components we
upgraded like wagon, sisu or aether. I'm not sure that for all issues
solved in these projects we have an MNG issue ? And nowadays we could
+1
No problems found on any of the projects I have tried it on. I've been
using it all day long @dayjob.
On 2011-11-25 10:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4.
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
+1 (non-binding)
--
Cheers, Stuart
On 25 Nov 2011, at 09:17, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to release Apache Maven 3.0.4.
We fixed 31 issues.
See release notes:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=17215
The staged repo is available here:
+1 (non-binding). Tested integration into a NetBeans development build, and
built some modules in Glassfish, so far without problem.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
