Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

Is there a way to disable this hack? I am trying to build the glassfish-corba project , which defines its own version of classes in the javax.rmi.CORBA package, and having --add-modules java.se.ee on the command line means that those classes aren’t

Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

2017-09-29 10:41 GMT+02:00 Alan Bateman : > On 29/09/2017 08:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > >> : >> >> 2) dealing with modules like java.sql which as not in java.base ( >> http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java.base-summary.html) >> Currently I have no solution as

Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

On 29/09/2017 08:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote: : 2) dealing with modules like java.sql which as not in java.base (http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/java.base-summary.html) Currently I have no solution as there is no official maven dependency for java.sql package You shouldn't need to

Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

Robert, Tibor, I agree with Robert that the tweak about adding --add-modules java.se.ee has really limited effect as I pointed out in another private email thread, actually the hack does not work with more than one forked JVM. My proposal is to drop that fix and document how to deal with changes

Re: [jira] (SUREFIRE-1424) javax.transaction.TransactionManager not visible with Java9

Hi Tibor, moving this to the dev-list, I don't think JIRA is the right place for this kind of discussions. bq. This is not a regression and not a bug in Surefire. Sorry, I don't agree with you. The Java8 project provided by Stéphane works with 2.20.0, but not with 2.20.1, so for me this