Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-11 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Wendy Smoak wsm...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new vote, since this one is formally closed? The 72 hour waiting time is a

72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Benson Margulies
The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new vote, since this one is formally closed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hello, Should be better now :-) 2011/7/10 Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com: The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new vote, since this one is formally closed? - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Mark Struberg
the vote is active until one closes it. LieGrue, strub --- On Sun, 7/10/11, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com Subject: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what? To: Maven Developers List dev@maven.apache.org Date: Sunday, July 10, 2011

Re: 72 hours, two binding votes, now what?

2011-07-10 Thread Wendy Smoak
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: The vote on wagon only attracted two binding +1 votes. Now what? A new vote, since this one is formally closed? The 72 hour waiting time is a minimum, you can certainly let it go longer (especially when it runs over