Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-05-03 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le vendredi 1 mai 2015 15:14:05 Andreas Gudian a écrit : Anyone who has ever done a release of a large plugin like surefire from a european location knows what a pain it is to svn-commit a couple of thousand files. It takes hours, but only if you're lucky and the process is not interrupted by

Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-05-03 Thread Andreas Gudian
5 gig? wow... I think a whole lot of of the pages is garbage that no one ever really reads. No, not the docs itself ;-) - I'm talking about the many many source xref and javadoc pages (both main and test code) And every single of those pages is updated on every release because they all

Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-05-03 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, when searching around for special constructs or when I have to need to understand some third party error messages I like to visit Java code on the Web as it safes me the need to check it out and especially it offers (usually) a good search and navigation. So this is by definition not for

Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-05-01 Thread Andreas Gudian
Anyone who has ever done a release of a large plugin like surefire from a european location knows what a pain it is to svn-commit a couple of thousand files. It takes hours, but only if you're lucky and the process is not interrupted by the server. I had to dance around that by zipping up the

Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-05-01 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, On 5/1/15 3:14 PM, Andreas Gudian wrote: Anyone who has ever done a release of a large plugin like surefire from a european location knows what a pain it is to svn-commit a couple of thousand files. It takes hours, but only if you're lucky and the process is not interrupted by the server.

Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-04-30 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2015-04-30 um 00:31 schrieb Stephen Connolly: http://bit.ly/1QLwWGS (Source: https://twitter.com/planetapache/status/593535338074611712) Wouldn't that imply always to clone a private copy of the entire repo with autogerated stuff just to push changes back to the canonical repo? Sounds

Re: Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-04-30 Thread Jason van Zyl
My read is this work much like Github pages works. You have a repository with your source and the rendered pages go into a branch. But nothing stops you from having the source in one repo and just pushing the generated content to another repo. This is currently how we do the M2Eclipse site. We

Do we want to go for gitpubsub?

2015-04-29 Thread Stephen Connolly
http://bit.ly/1QLwWGS (Source: https://twitter.com/planetapache/status/593535338074611712) Sent from my iPad - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org