to put it in the same structure as
pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm
providers.
So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional or mandatory?) a
workitem
concept. Jazz does, and it's optional per workspace. What other SCM
use/require a workitem concept
.
Firstly, what do we call the
workitemId/ticketNo/whateverelsethingsarecalled ?
Where do we put it? I'd be tempted to put it in the same structure as
pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm
providers.
So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional or mandatory
have some time shortly to look into fixing the outstanding Jazz
issues.
Firstly, what do we call the
workitemId/ticketNo/whateverelsethingsarecalled ?
Where do we put it? I'd be tempted to put it in the same structure as
pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm
the outstanding Jazz
issues.
Firstly, what do we call the
workitemId/ticketNo/whateverelsethingsarecalled ?
Where do we put it? I'd be tempted to put it in the same structure as
pushChanges, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm
providers.
So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional
, as it's easily accessable and can be used across all scm
providers.
So you've said that MS TFS uses (is it optional or mandatory?) a workitem
concept. Jazz does, and it's optional per workspace. What other SCM
use/require a workitem concept? ClearQuest enabled UCM Clearcase has a
task. Any others
Hi Chris,
I had to dive deep in my mail archive, but it seems that the day after my
attempt a colleague managed to release with my initial setup. So it
probably had to do with my rights, configuration or whatever. I'll ask the
status of that project and if the still can release
Hi Robert!
From a thread a long time ago! This issue has popped up again.
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SCM-775
Did you/How did you ever end up solving the issue for TFS?
You're right, a general solution would be preferable.
I think the workflow around the (re)use of a Work Item would be
Hi,
Recently I had a look at Microsoft Team Foundation Server and faced the
same kind of issue.
I'm not sure if you could/should reuse a WorkItem. For the
maven-release-plugin this could very well be acceptable, but for commits
in general? I don't think so.
If it is static, then you can
Hey All.
In the RTC/Jazz forum, a request came up for the ability to associate a
Work Item with the commits that the SCM plugin does.
On the Jazz side, I think that I've worked things out.
However, I am unsure as to how to best do this on the maven and scm
provider side.
The generic question
.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 2/5/11, ol...@apache.org ol...@apache.org wrote:
From: ol...@apache.org ol...@apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1067545 - in /maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers:
maven-scm-providers-git/maven-scm-provider-gitexe/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/scm
Hi,
I have moved this to sandbox until we have released (or snapshots)
dependencies available.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
2009/12/29 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
On 29/12/2009, at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
maybe I should have mentioned: the jgit-simple was written by me. But I only
combined
On 29/12/2009, at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
maybe I should have mentioned: the jgit-simple was written by me. But I only
combined fragments of existing code I found in jgit-core (plus Jason and
Shawn Pearce helped me), so this has also BSD license. Since we host this on
sonatype, we
at 3:29 PM, ol...@apache.org wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Nov 30 23:29:16 2009
New Revision: 885618
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=885618view=rev
Log:
revert SCM-487
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-svn/maven-scm-provider-svnexe/src/main
: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=885618view=rev
Log:
revert SCM-487
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-svn/maven-scm-provider-svnexe/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/scm/provider/svn/svnexe/command/tag/SvnTagCommand.java
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers
...@apache.org wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Nov 30 23:29:16 2009
New Revision: 885618
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=885618view=rev
Log:
revert SCM-487
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-svn/maven-scm-provider-svnexe/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/scm
element that has start- and endtags
with an empty test.accurev.password / with only a single closed tag. Empty
elements of the previous kind are rewritten by the Release Plugin to the
latter kind.
o Use the latest version of the license header.
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers
The license header was lost in
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-accurev/pom.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:20:31 2008
New Revision: 684902
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=684902view=rev
Log:
[maven-release-plugin] prepare release
:-)
Thanks Dennis.
--
Olivier
2008/8/11 Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The license header was lost in
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-accurev/pom.xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: olamy
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:20:31 2008
New Revision: 684902
URL: http
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have some tests. Sorry for noise but I can't test release:prepare
-DdryRun=true.
And license header is always lost.
Someone can help to put magics characters which we solve this.
See if this helps:
Thanks but looks not :-(
2008/8/12 Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Olivier Lamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have some tests. Sorry for noise but I can't test release:prepare
-DdryRun=true.
And license header is always lost.
Someone can help to put magics
just want to share the outcome of my research:
I took the head revisions of all important modules and the release process
works well then, also
for branches. Matthew is still looking what has been different in his setup.
What caused some problems on my company notebook where I use maven 2.0.4 is
struberg wrote:
For the really 'edgy' guys out there: I've fixed the
maven-scm-provider-git to also work with
git-1.5.4.
$ git-clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git
as usual...
Please provide feedback, so we can move this to codehaus if it's mature
enough
.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git
as usual...
Please provide feedback, so we can move this to codehaus if it's
mature
enough.
Great stuff. I've played with some functionality and it worked with
cygwin
git after I fixed some minor things on Windows. Left comment on
SCM-182
For the really 'edgy' guys out there: I've fixed the maven-scm-provider-git to
also work with
git-1.5.4.
$ git-clone http://ns1.backwork.net/git/maven-scm-providers-git.git
as usual...
Please provide feedback, so we can move this to codehaus if it's mature enough.
LieGrü,
strub
--- Mark
--- Mark Struberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi!
I used a few days in bed to write a scm provider for git.
I basically looked at a few of the standard maven scm-providers (cvs, svn,
vss) and decided to
take the maven-scm-providers-svn to act as the basis of the git
implementation.
So
Hi!
I used a few days in bed to write a scm provider for git.
I basically looked at a few of the standard maven scm-providers (cvs, svn, vss)
and decided to
take the maven-scm-providers-svn to act as the basis of the git implementation.
So there are most probably still a few svn-ish commands
in
a profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM
providers, we'll need some decent profile activators which
installations. Why do you put them in
a profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM
providers, we'll need some decent
without SCM installations. Why do you put them in a profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers,
we'll
=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers, we'll need
some decent profile activators which tell us if the provider is support on the
system.
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml
Modified: maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml
URL
them in a profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers,
we'll need some decent profile activators which
the weirder SCM providers,
we'll need some decent profile activators which tell us if the
provider is support on the system.
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml
Modified: maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm
. Why do you put them in a profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM providers,
we'll need some decent profile
in a
profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM
providers, we'll need some decent profile activators which tell
you put them in a
profile?
Emmanuel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Author: jvanzyl
Date: Mon Jan 15 06:58:34 2007
New Revision: 496356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=496356
Log:
o create a profile which contains all the weirder SCM
providers, we'll need some decent profile
/maven-scm-plugin/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-clearcase/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-local/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/maven-scm-manager-plexus/
pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-plugin/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/
pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider
/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/
pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-
clearcase/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-local/
pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-
perforce/pom.xml
maven
-manager-plexus/
pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-managers/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-plugin/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-bazaar/
pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-provider-
clearcase/pom.xml
maven/scm/trunk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: evenisse
Date: Mon May 15 08:36:52 2006
New Revision: 406655
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=406655view=rev
Log:
Use a port different than default 2401 port
Modified:
maven/scm/trunk/maven-scm-providers/maven-scm-providers-cvs/maven-scm-provider-cvs
Wim,
it doesn't compile :
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
D:\apache\maven\trunks\scm\maven-scm-providers\maven-scm-provider-clearcase\src\main\java\org\apache\maven\scm\provider\
clearcase\ClearCaseScmProvider.java
] [INFO] Compilation failureD:\apache\maven\trunks\scm\maven-scm-providers\maven-scm-provider-clearcase\src\main\java\org\apache\maven\scm\provider\
clearcase\ClearCaseScmProvider.java:[37,62] packageorg.apache.maven.scm.provider.clearcase.command.update does not existD:\apache\maven\trunks\scm
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone using Maven is also using ClearCase, Perform
or StarTeam in their environment on a regular basis, and would be
interested in helping to test out releases of the SCM plugin and
Changlog plugin. I would like to revisit this in about 2 weeks.
Please don't CC both lists
43 matches
Mail list logo
