I'm happy with that :)
James
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 22:15 +0200, Jason van Zyl wrote:
If we are just tossing in brand new technology into 2.1 I think we
should just put Mercury into 2.1. It has a _lot_ of tests and is
actively being worked on by 5 people in the community. It also covers
If we are just tossing in brand new technology into 2.1 I think we
should just put Mercury into 2.1. It has a _lot_ of tests and is
actively being worked on by 5 people in the community. It also covers
all the PGP concerns people have and the WebDAV client is also built
in. I'll bring this
Hi there,
Thought I'd best highlight a regression I've found with 2.1.0-M1 after
all the hard work John put in to mitigate them:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MDEPLOY-85
Cheers,
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Ugh. I guess we knew this was a risk when we decided to go with wagon
beta-4...it's a good thing this was just a milestone release, eh? :-)
I posted a comment, but it's probably more procedural than anything,
since many of the same people are involved between the wagon project and
the
Sorry, that bug is my fault. Ill try to get this fixed for milestone 2.
James
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 12:54 -0400, John Casey wrote:
Ugh. I guess we knew this was a risk when we decided to go with wagon
beta-4...it's a good thing this was just a milestone release, eh? :-)
I posted a comment,
