---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 3:26 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
On Jan. 23, 2015, 4:16 p.m., Adam B wrote:
Changing protobufs is tricky when considering backwards-compatibility.
Looks like include/mesos/fetcher/fetcher.proto is part of the public API,
it's only used by containerizers, but not just the mesos/docker
containerizers, but also any
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 3:27 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
On Jan. 7, 2015, 2:50 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
src/master/flags.hpp, lines 361-373
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29507/diff/1/?file=804645#file804645line361
Do you mind changing the names now that they're merely defaults?
s/SLAVE_PING_TIMEOUT/DEFAULT_SLAVE_PING_TIMEOUT/
Thanks for sharing! Does this project by any chance utilise the new (not sure
if merged or released) service discovery protobufs in Mesos?
--
Tom Arnfeld
Developer // DueDil
(+44) 7525940046
25 Christopher Street, London, EC2A 2BS
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Christos Kozyrakis
On Jan. 23, 2015, 3:31 p.m., Adam B wrote:
src/tests/fetcher_tests.cpp, line 269
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30034/diff/2/?file=826090#file826090line269
How do we get verbose fetcher output now? If it's a libprocess actor,
can we just set the GTEST_v environment variable? Where
On Jan. 22, 2015, 11:19 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
src/tests/mesos.cpp, line 614
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30173/diff/1/?file=829921#file829921line614
If you call pop with an empty task status queue, you actually remove
the temporaroy holder in your constructor.
On Jan. 23, 2015, 4:16 p.m., Adam B wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 253
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30036/diff/3/?file=827799#file827799line253
Do we also need to check for empty-string user here, or valid path
name, or valid user? Or is that validation
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30039/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 9:21 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30173/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 8:49 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
Hi Tom,
the protobuf changes for service discovery will hopefully make it to the
0.22 release and we will update the A and SRV record generator to take
advantage of them.
We still have to decide what naming schemes to support based on this
information. I suspect that we will have to support a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30173/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 9:47 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30037/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 9:44 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30263/
---
Review request for mesos and Cody Maloney.
Bugs: MESOS-2165
Hi All
I'd like to extend and add new feature into Mesos to support GPU
resource allocation, so we can put OpenCL application/framework on top
of Mesos and make it write once run across cluster.
Why choose OpenCL, due to it was widely supported by Intel , Nvidia,
AMD, Qualcomm GPGPU, so we may
On Jan. 21, 2015, 11:45 a.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 222
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30006/diff/2/?file=828185#file828185line222
Can't you directly bind(collect, pendingDownloads)?
Bernd Mathiske wrote:
Don't know how to bind to a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30006/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 4:16 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
On Jan. 23, 2015, 5:28 p.m., Timothy Chen wrote:
src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp, line 443
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30037/diff/6/?file=829687#file829687line443
Why only return a extension when you have a basename?
There is an explanation a few lines further down now:
//
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30037/#review69566
---
src/slave/containerizer/fetcher.cpp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30037/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 3:57 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30006/
---
(Updated Jan. 25, 2015, 5:36 a.m.)
Review request for mesos, Adam B, Benjamin
On Jan. 23, 2015, 5:01 p.m., Adam B wrote:
include/mesos/fetcher/fetcher.proto, lines 37-38
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30037/diff/6/?file=829684#file829684line37
Maybe it would be better to call this BYPASS_CACHE, and then the other
two could be combined into USE_CACHE. At that
Hi All,
The #MesosCon[1] program committee is actively seeking nominations for
keynote speakers. This year's #MesosCon will take place in Seattle,
August 20-21, 2015.
If you have any recommendations, please share them by filling out the
following form:
23 matches
Mail list logo
