On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> > Ran on ASF CI.
> >
> > Found following issues.
> >
> > Failed test: CommandExecutorCheckTest.CommandCheckDeliveredAndReconciled
> >
Your request for analysis of Mesos has been completed successfully.
The results are available at
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Vinod Kone wrote:
> Ran on ASF CI.
>
> Found following issues.
>
> Failed test: CommandExecutorCheckTest.CommandCheckDeliveredAndReconciled
>
Hi Benjamin,
Thanks for the response. I agree that we should get all the 4 options start
as early as we can.
The reason I'm pushing for the 5) option is that we probably won't get
everything fixed within 1-2 minor release cycles, and I need a way to get
around the problem badly. Also, with a
Ran on ASF CI.
Found following issues.
Failed test: CommandExecutorCheckTest.CommandCheckDeliveredAndReconciled
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Michael Park wrote:
> I'm all for moving to GCC 4.9+.
>
> I'd love to get C++14 and bump to GCC 5, but I think we should do an
> investigation for "reasonable availability" before we do that.
I agree, although I'd think a similar investigation
C++14 would be nice, btw in addition to the list above - Ubuntu 16.04 has
gcc 5.4.0
I'm all for moving to GCC 4.9+.
I'd love to get C++14 and bump to GCC 5, but I think we should do an
investigation
for "reasonable availability" before we do that.
Also, clang has supported C++14 / since 3.5, which is our current
requirement.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Benjamin Mahler
There's a spreadsheet linked in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2604 that captures which OSes
we can support based on compiler version:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ji8p3p_1JqUsMxE31mJqqztHf7LDx7mGMXh253azWpU/edit#gid=0
Also, do we have already have a minimum clang version
It seems that if we moved to GCC 5, we'd also be able to move to C++14
(https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx14).
CentOS 6 users will need to install devtoolset anyway (which makes it
easy to get GCC 5 or 6), so I wonder if skipping directly to requiring
GCC 5 would be feasible?
Neil
Along with various additions and optimizations, support for would be
nice to have. Thoughts on this?
With the joint effort from Mesosphere and Microsoft, the windows build
performance *should* be about equal with Posix/Linux now, ~76% tests are
enabled on the ported windows components, and Mesos container/docker container
tasks are launched successfully e2e.
We will start helping Mesos windows
12 matches
Mail list logo