rmation. It would be good to introduce generic topology structure
> so
> > > that generic interconnects and associated resource topology can be
> > > expressed.
> > >
> > > Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7080
> > >
> > &
--
> > Vikram
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Dmitry Zhuk [mailto:dz...@twopensource.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 6:49 AM
> > To: dev@mesos.apache.org
> > Subject: CPU affinity
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > Is anyone working
sociated resource topology can be
> expressed.
>
> Please have a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-7080
>
> --
> Vikram
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dmitry Zhuk [mailto:dz...@twopensource.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 6:49 AM
> To: de
Subject: CPU affinity
Hi
Is anyone working on MESOS-314
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-314> “Support the cgroups
'cpusets' subsystem” or related functionality? I found other related
tickets in JIRA, but there seems to be no recent progress on them:
MESOS-5342
Hello Mesos Developer community!
I didn't want to hijack the other CPU Affinity thread, so here's a
different question:
Has anyone on this list tested the major cloud providers (including AWS,
GCP, Azure) to see if CPU affinity actually *WORKS* on those virtualization
schemes?
Since the NUMA
wse/MESOS-5342>, MESOS-5358
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-5358>. There’s also a mention
of idea of exposing cpusets similar to network ports.
I’d like propose an alternative approach for adding CPU affinity support
and would be interested in any feedback on it. If the commu
