Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9255 to make this
consistent.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Benjamin Mahler wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin Bannier <
> benjamin.bann...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> and thank you for answering.
>>
>> > >
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Benjamin Bannier <
benjamin.bann...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> and thank you for answering.
>
> > > For frameworks in the same role on the other hand we choose to
> normalize
> > > with the allocated resources
> >
> > Within a role, the framework's share
Hi Ben,
and thank you for answering.
> > For frameworks in the same role on the other hand we choose to normalize
> > with the allocated resources
>
> Within a role, the framework's share is evaluated using the *role*'s total
> allocation as a denominator. Were you referring to the role's total
> For frameworks in the same role on the other hand we choose to normalize
with the allocated resources
Within a role, the framework's share is evaluated using the *role*'s total
allocation as a denominator. Were you referring to the role's total
allocation when you said "allocated resources"?
I
Hi,
the DRF flavors we use in our hierarchical allocator slightly differ between
how we identify the role and the framework most under fair share.
In DRF each actual usage is normalized to some “total”. For roles we use the
total resources in the cluster (or for quota the total non-revocable
