Re: Introducing a CMake-based build system for Mesos

For the time being we're planning on adding a new test container that will just use CMake and will run make check. Later, when we get to a point where all the tests are being picked up by CMake, we will follow your advice to make sure that CMake and autotools do not diverge. Cheers, Artem. On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.25.0 (rc2)

I have the exact same result as Greg. > On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:14 AM, Greg Mann wrote: > > Successfully built `sudo make distcheck` on CentOS 7.1 and Ubuntu 14.04 > with only expected test failures. On our Fedora 22 CI build, however, while > the tests are building the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.25.0 (rc2)

I suppose this makes my vote +1 binding, assuming the cherry-picking happens. > On Oct 8, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Bernd Mathiske wrote: > > I have the exact same result as Greg. > >> On Oct 8, 2015, at 12:14 AM, Greg Mann wrote: >> >> Successfully built

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

Alex, Implementing your own containerizer totally makes sense. The containerizer interface can be modulized and your own containerizer can be implemented as a module. Please take a look at the module documentation . From what I can

Re: shepherd for MESOS-3600

> On Oct 7, 2015, at 10:35 AM, James Peach wrote: > > Hi all, > > Can I get a shepherd for MESOS-3600? and also https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3608 :)

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

Actually we have been thinking to implement our own containerizer, and the option to use ECP seemed attractive. Can you, please, elaborate on the implications of having our own containerizer without ECP? I assume we would have to implement it in cpp, it might require recompiling (parts of)

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Jie Yu wrote: > Alex, > > Implementing your own containerizer totally makes sense. The containerizer > interface can be modulized and your own containerizer can be implemented as > a module. Please take a look at the module documentation >

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

Kapil Arya wrote on 08/10/2015 09:21:14 PM: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jie Yu wrote: > > > but I don't see 'containerizer' as one of the supported module types listed > > > in the documentation.. Can you, please, clarify? > > > > > > Not right

Re: apply-reviews.py

Hi Artem, thanks for your work on improving the commit process. I have used the '-g' feature for github PRs in the past, and we should continue to support that model, so that new Mesos contributors don't have to create new RB accounts and learn a new process just for quick documentation changes,

Re: apply-reviews.py

Thanks, Adam! Just created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-3625. Cheers, Artem. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > Hi Artem, thanks for your work on improving the commit process. > > I have used the '-g' feature for github PRs in the past, and

Fwd: Still Failing: apache/mesos#1269 (master - b74ed17)

I just received this and it looks like it's failing because it's missing a Rakefile. Someone recently set this up? Tim -- Forwarded message -- From: Travis CI Date: Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 4:15 PM Subject: Still Failing: apache/mesos#1269 (master - b74ed17)

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

Thanks Jie, this sounds promising, but I don't see 'containerizer' as one of the supported module types listed in the documentation.. Can you, please, clarify? Thanks, Alex From: Jie Yu To: u...@mesos.apache.org Cc: dev Date:

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

Alex, but I don't see 'containerizer' as one of the supported module types listed > in the documentation.. Can you, please, clarify? Not right now, but should be very trivial to do. Kapil or I can definitely help with this. - Jie On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Alex Glikson

Re: Removing external containerizer from code base

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jie Yu wrote: > Alex, > > but I don't see 'containerizer' as one of the supported module types listed > > in the documentation.. Can you, please, clarify? > > > Not right now, but should be very trivial to do. Kapil or I can definitely > help

apply-reviews.py

Folks, The current implementation of apply-review.sh does not allow applying a chain of reviews. It has been a major inconvenience for a lot of us, so I have put together a python script that makes it possible to apply a chain of reviews (the corresponding JIRA is at [0]). The version of the