Re: Community Sync Interval
Alex - everyone is welcome to join, we usually send an email to this mailing list a day or two prior to the event with the agenda and a link to the livestream and the hangout. I don't think there is "a form" as such (or, if there is one, I don't know where it is :) ). -- *Marco Massenzio* Distributed Systems Engineer http://codetrips.com On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Clemmerwrote: > (Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the > community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes, > but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed > yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?) > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano > wrote: > > +1 weekly > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" > wrote: > > Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for > > bi-weekly. > > Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive > thing > > about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who > > "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!) > > Thanks! > > -- > > *Marco Massenzio* > > Distributed Systems Engineer > > http://codetrips.com > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo wrote: > > > +1 for weekly. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Diana Arroyo > > > darr...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 > > > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > > > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > From: tommy xiao > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM > > > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > > > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the > first > > > > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > > > > > > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am > and > > > 5pm > > > > or something like that.) > > > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and > 9pm(Pacific) > > > OK > > > > > for UTC+8. > > > > > > > > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host > places? > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the > times > > > to > > > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could > mean > > > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of > these a > > > > week, > > > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west > > > coast > > > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can > still > > > > include > > > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to > attend at > > > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer > present. > > > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave > weekly > > > > >> meetings have a chance. > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get > it on > > > > the > > > > >> calendar! > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 for weekly > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress > step by > > > > >> step > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > > > > > Regards! > > > > > > > > Yong Qiao Wang(王勇桥) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Jojy Varghese > > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > > Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > > > > Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 bi-weekly > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov < > > > a...@mesosphere.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 Weekly > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -Elizabeth > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann > > > > wrote: > > > > >>>
Re: Community Sync Interval
We previously proposed creating a google calender that we can share on the dev list for people to use, but need to decide on the frequency/schedule before we can set that up. In the meantime, watch this list for the announcement of the weekly or bi-weekly meeting, usually happening on Thursdays. And yes, anybody can attend, but keep in mind that this meeting focuses on Mesos developer issues rather than user issues. Alex, you are of course quite welcome to attend. We cannot fit everybody in a hangout, so we have recently switched to using "hangouts on air". That way, most attendees can watch the video and ask brief questions on IRC, while those with agenda items (or lengthier questions/comments) can join the actual hangout to have their voices heard. On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Marco Massenziowrote: > Alex - everyone is welcome to join, we usually send an email to this > mailing list a day or two prior to the event with the agenda and a link to > the livestream and the hangout. > > I don't think there is "a form" as such (or, if there is one, I don't know > where it is :) ). > > -- > *Marco Massenzio* > Distributed Systems Engineer > http://codetrips.com > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Clemmer > > wrote: > > > (Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the > > community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes, > > but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed > > yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?) > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano > > wrote: > > > +1 weekly > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" > > wrote: > > > Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 > for > > > bi-weekly. > > > Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive > > thing > > > about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those > who > > > "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!) > > > Thanks! > > > -- > > > *Marco Massenzio* > > > Distributed Systems Engineer > > > http://codetrips.com > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo wrote: > > > > +1 for weekly. > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Diana Arroyo > > > > darr...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 > > > > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > > > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > > > > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > > > From: tommy xiao > > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM > > > > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > > > > > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the > > first > > > > > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > > > > > > > > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am > > and > > > > 5pm > > > > > or something like that.) > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and > > 9pm(Pacific) > > > > OK > > > > > > for UTC+8. > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host > > places? > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the > > times > > > > to > > > > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could > > mean > > > > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of > > these a > > > > > week, > > > > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the > west > > > > coast > > > > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can > > still > > > > > include > > > > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to > > attend at > > > > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer > > present. > > > > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave > > weekly > > > > > >> meetings have a chance. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can > get > > it on > > > > > the > > > > > >> calendar! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> +1 for weekly > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress > > step by > > > > > >> step > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > +1 for
Re: Community Sync Interval
+1 biweekly On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Alex Clemmerwrote: > (Sorry, just out of ignorance: is anyone allowed to come to the > community sync? I googled around and it looks like the answer is yes, > but I don't see a living schedule anywhere... If the answer is indeed > yes, is there a form where I can sign up for the calendar invite?) > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher M Luciano > wrote: > > +1 weekly > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, 12:38:31 PM, "Marco Massenzio" > wrote: > > Just to clarify, I'd been assuming rotating times when I gave my +1 for > > bi-weekly. > > Having said that, I don't feel too strongly about it - the positive > thing > > about weekly meetings is that we can skip one every other for those who > > "like it bi-weekly" :) (the other way, instead, not being possible!) > > Thanks! > > -- > > *Marco Massenzio* > > Distributed Systems Engineer > > http://codetrips.com > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Diana J Arroyo wrote: > > > +1 for weekly. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Diana Arroyo > > > darr...@us.ibm.com > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for tommy xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 > > > AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske > > xiao ---10/16/2015 07:20:13 AM---+1 for bi-weekly. 2015-10-16 17:36 > > > GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > From: tommy xiao > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > Date: 10/16/2015 07:20 AM > > > Subject: Re: Community Sync Interval > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > > > 2015-10-16 17:36 GMT+08:00 Bernd Mathiske : > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly and I have been assuming rotating times in the > first > > > > place, as I suspect many others as well. > > > > > > > > (9am and 3pm are not very far apart. Probably better to go for 8am > and > > > 5pm > > > > or something like that.) > > > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2015, at 11:08 AM, haosdent wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If we rotating times, weekly reasonable. I think 9am and > 9pm(Pacific) > > > OK > > > > > for UTC+8. > > > > > > > > > > +1 weekly, with rotating times. And do we need confirm host > places? > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Adam Bordelon > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Wow, split crowd. Keep in mind that we also want to adjust the > times > > > to > > > > >> better accommodate people in different time zones. This could > mean > > > > >> something like 9am, 3pm, 9pm, 3pm (Pacific). If we do one of > these a > > > > week, > > > > >> then we end up with bi-weekly 3pm meetings, for those on the west > > > coast > > > > >> that don't want to wake up early or stay up late. And we can > still > > > > include > > > > >> Europe and Asia with the early/late meetings, so they get to > attend at > > > > >> least one a month, hopefully with at least a one committer > present. > > > > >> Nobody's expected to attend every meeting, but those who crave > weekly > > > > >> meetings have a chance. > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 weekly, with rotating times. Let's decide soon, so we can get > it on > > > > the > > > > >> calendar! > > > > >> > > > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Klaus Ma wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1 for weekly > > > > >>> > > > > >>> Agree with a shorter weekly meeting to sync up, make progress > step by > > > > >> step > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On 2015年10月16日 10:49, Yong Qiao Wang wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > > > > > Regards! > > > > > > > > Yong Qiao Wang(王勇桥) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Jojy Varghese > > > > To: dev@mesos.apache.org > > > > Date: 16/10/2015 09:01 > > > > Subject:Re: Community Sync Interval > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 bi-weekly > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Isabel Jimenez > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Alex Rukletsov < > > > a...@mesosphere.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 for bi-weekly. > > > > >> > > > > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Elizabeth Lingg > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 Weekly > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -Elizabeth > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Thursday, October 15, 2015, Greg Mann > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> I agree with Daniel, +1 for weekly and we can re-evaluate > in a > > > bit > > > > to > > > > > > > > >>> see > > > > >> > > > > >>> how people are liking it. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Guangya Liu < > > > gyliu...@gmail.com > > > >