Re: Problems with deprecation cycles for critical/hard to adapt dependencies

+1 for time-based deprecation cycle of O(months) On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Zameer Manji wrote: > Niklas, > > Thanks for starting this thread. I think Mesos can best move forward if it > switches from release based deprecation cycle to a time based deprecation > cycle.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.22.2 (rc1)

Only one binding vote on this release so far. Could I get another couple votes, please? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM, haosdent wrote: > Oh, got it. CentOS 6.6 don't have automake 1.4, so have to build it for > source code. I fetch it from >

Problems with deprecation cycles for critical/hard to adapt dependencies

Hi everyone, With a (targeted) release cadence of *one month*, we should revisit our deprecation cycles of 3 releases (e.g. in version N, we warn. In version N+1, support both old and new API. In Version N+2, we break compatibility). Sometimes we cannot do the first step, and we deprecate in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.22.2 (rc1)

+1 (binding), tested on internal CI On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 8:58 AM, haosdent wrote: > Oh, got it. CentOS 6.6 don't have automake 1.4, so have to build it for > source code. I fetch it from > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/mesos.git before. > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015

Re: Patch for the website's Rakefile

+ Dev On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Dave Lester wrote: > Can this be discussed on the mailing list? Thanks > > > On Monday, September 28, 2015, Joseph Wu wrote: > >> + Niq, Joris, MPark (so that this doesn't get neglected when the website >> is

Request : Add to contributor list

Thanks in advance ! Best,Mandeep