Re: Reminder: MesosCon North America CFP closes Wednesday, March 9th

Quick update: I'm pleased to share that the number of proposals submitted to MesosCon has more than doubled since last year! As a result, it's taking additional time to set up the community review forms. Hang tight, and we'll announce details on the mailing lists in the next day or two as well as

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

@ Niklas/Jie, just sent the invitation to you :) Da (Klaus), Ma (马达) | PMP® | Advisory Software Engineer Platform OpenSource Technology, STG, IBM GCG +86-10-8245 4084 | klaus1982...@gmail.com | http://k82.me On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Guangya Liu wrote: > This

Shepherd for MESOS-1757 Speed up the tests

Hi, after @JianQiu and @Shuai Lin great jobs, most tickets in the MESOS-1757 Speed up the tests have already reviewable. Because of @ben busy with other issues recently, I sent this email to seek reviews and helps about the patches in this

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

This is the google doc that we used to trace all discussion topics: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1B_v52zCOFcwCpqCPhgYi9h630a0NE-QM9Br0nCOZUR4/edit?usp=sharing This is the link for google hang out video call Join video call

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

Sounds good, the next one is tomorrow March 15th at 5pm PST (they are at 5pm PST to accommodate China time zone). Will that work? On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Niklas Nielsen wrote: > Ben, when do you have your next mesos allocator sync? We don't have our > next performance

Re: shepherd for MESOS-4735, and proposal

+1 for the new `filename` field for the URI. It would also be useful for implementing base64:// or data:// scheme uri fetcher, so that the scheduler can pass arbitary file blobs to the task directly without resorting to a custom executor. (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4524) On Tue,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.28.0 (rc2)

Maybe fill a ticket in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS would be more convenience for further discussion. By the way, could "OsTest.User" pass in your machine? It also call "os::getgid" during test. On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Zhitao Li wrote: > When

shepherd for MESOS-4735, and proposal

Hi all, Looking for a shepherd for this task: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4735 As Zhitao mentioned in the ticket, the frequently-encountered inability to extract archives from webhdfs-fetched files due to the inclusion of things like query params in the resulting filename is

Re: Shepherd for MESOS-4744

I can help review this one. Jian, feel free to add me as reviewer when you post your patch, my reviewboard username is 'greggomann'. Cheers, Greg On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Michael Park wrote: > I suspect this will be a simple change. > I'm willing to shepherd this if

Re: Shepherd for MESOS-4744

I suspect this will be a simple change. I'm willing to shepherd this if someone else can give it a thorough review. Thanks, MPark On 14 March 2016 at 01:17, Jian Qiu wrote: > Hi, > > Could anyone help shepherding the ticket of MESOS-4744 ( >

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.28.0 (rc2)

+1 (non-binding) Ran `sudo make check` on Centos 7. All tests passed. Also ran some runtime tests with unified containerizer launching docker images and regular mesos tasks, as well as some tasks using the docker containerizer. All working as expected Cheers, -Dan -Original Message-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.28.0 (rc2)

+1 (non-binding) Ran `sudo make check` on CentOS 7 and Ubuntu 14.04, using gcc with libevent and SSL enabled. On CentOS 7, all tests passed. On Ubuntu 14.04, one test failed: MemoryPressureMesosTest.CGROUPS_ROOT_Statistics. This is a flaky test; it passes most of the time. While there have been

Looking for shepherd of MESOS-4807

Hi All,Can anyone shepherd MESOS-4807?https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4807This is a minor issue though the fix of this issue will allow mesos tests to be executed in parallel in the future.Thanks a lot for the help!Yong

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

Ben, when do you have your next mesos allocator sync? We don't have our next performance isolation sync lined up yet, so we could piggy back on yours if you have it scheduled already. Niklas On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jie Yu wrote: > > > > Just a quick note: Ian D.

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

> > Just a quick note: Ian D. and the performance isolation working group are > discussing similar annotations and we should meet and talk about the > options. +1 Would love to understand the relationship between this and the task/executor level annotations. - Jie On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:29

Re: RFC: RevocableInfo Changes

Hi Ben, Just a quick note: Ian D. and the performance isolation working group are discussing similar annotations and we should meet and talk about the options. Niklas On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Klaus Ma wrote: > Yes, I think that's true for now; so we define

Re: [3/3] mesos git commit: New python lib with only the executor driver.

FWIW I bet it would be helpful to have a general-purpose minimal executor library. > On Mar 11, 2016, at 6:55 PM, Benjamin Mahler wrote: > > +vinod > > This breaks the build for me on OS X, it appears this line is the culprit: > > EXTRA_LINK_ARGS = ['-Wl,--as-needed']