Re: Reverting `UPDATE_QUOTA_WITH_ROLE`

Actually a bit confusing when see `temporary-no-answer`. On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 6:43 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > Firstly, I'm going to take this discussion to dev@, since I think it would > be valuable information for the community and it doesn't contain any > private

Re: Reverting `UPDATE_QUOTA_WITH_ROLE`

Firstly, I'm going to take this discussion to dev@, since I think it would be valuable information for the community and it doesn't contain any private information. Secondly, we currently have a simple rule that should be sufficient for 1.0. If an authorization::Action ends in "_WITH_FOO", then