[GitHub] mesos issue #165: mesoscon eu - hackatron exercise - CI using travis

Github user haosdent commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/165 yah, actually apache jenkins have integrated with github. Could provide build status via this badge icons. Build status: 

[GitHub] mesos pull request #205: Clarify existence of FrameworkID in SUBSCRIBE calls...

GitHub user aaronjwood opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/205 Clarify existence of FrameworkID in SUBSCRIBE calls. Wanted to clarify how `FrameworkID` should or shouldn't be set in `SUBSCRIBE` calls. Spoke with Anand about this earlier today when I was

[GitHub] mesos issue #165: mesoscon eu - hackatron exercise - CI using travis

Github user dcaba commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/165 Great. Thanks for the update; this parallel CI job in travis (this PR was bringing) was not adding too much benefits (just the nice github <-> travis integration, that can show green ticks or red

[GitHub] mesos pull request #165: mesoscon eu - hackatron exercise - CI using travis

Github user dcaba closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/mesos/pull/165 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 1.1.1 (rc2)

+1 (binding) Since the perf issue I reported earlier doesn't seem to be a blocker. On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:14 AM, Alex Rukletsov wrote: > Was this perf issue introduced by one of the fixes included in 1.1.1-rc2? > If not, I would suggest we vote for 1.1.1-rc2 and back

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 1.2.0 (rc2)

+1 (binding) Since the perf and flaky test that I reported earlier doesn't seem to be blockers. On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Adam Bordelon wrote: > I haven't heard any -1's so I'm going to go ahead and vote myself, from a > DC/OS perspective: > > +1 (binding) > > I ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 1.2.0 (rc2)

I haven't heard any -1's so I'm going to go ahead and vote myself, from a DC/OS perspective: +1 (binding) I ran 1.2.0-rc2 through the DC/OS integration tests on top of the 1.9.0-rc1, which covers many Mesos features and tests multiple frameworks. See CI results of