We may not know the original authentication account for all usecases.
Especially in cloud deployments where authentication events can be
federated in various ways.
Yes, cross project work in the security space can bring some interesting
synergies.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 3:39 PM Simon Elliston
Glad to see this work being done!
Please feel free to reach out to Knox dev@ list for any assistance and
potentially review.
Only sort of related, I have been thinking about another integration
between Knox and Metron wherein possible threat details can be communicated
to Knox to take action on
I added the feature branch: feature/METRON-1663-knoxsso
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=metron.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/feature/METRON-1663-knoxsso
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 11:13 AM Otto Fowler
wrote:
> I think I understand what you are saying very very very well Simon. I am
> not
I think I understand what you are saying very very very well Simon. I am
not sure what would be different about your submittal from other submittals
where that argument failed.
On July 12, 2018 at 11:07:02, Simon Elliston Ball (
si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote:
Agreed Otto, the challenge is
Agreed Otto, the challenge is that essentially each change cuts across
dependencies in every component. I could break it down into the changes for
making SSO work, and the changes for making it install, and the changes for
making full-dev work, but that would mean violating our policy that testing
A discussion thread on what you have come up with, the choices you made
would be warranted as well.
On July 12, 2018 at 11:00:47, Otto Fowler (ottobackwa...@gmail.com) wrote:
Our policy in the past on such things is to require that they are broken
into small reviewable chunks on a feature
Our policy in the past on such things is to require that they are broken
into small reviewable chunks on a feature branch, even if the end to end
working version was more ‘usable’.
On July 12, 2018 at 10:51:30, Simon Elliston Ball (
si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote:
I've been doing some work
+1 to feature branch. I agree it's probably a fairly hefty contribution
that would benefit from being in a feature branch.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:56 AM Casey Stella wrote:
> I would support this being a feature branch. It sounds like a valuable but
> large contribution.
>
> On Thu, Jul 12,
I would support this being a feature branch. It sounds like a valuable but
large contribution.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:51 AM Simon Elliston Ball <
si...@simonellistonball.com> wrote:
> I've been doing some work on getting the Metron UIs and REST layers to work
> with Apache KnoxSSO, and LDAP
